Brilliant piece once again Miri and not just because of the big name (I too often look at the Amish and ponder "What's not to like?"). Unpopular opinion but knife crime in the UK falls into the same category. Overwhelmingly most people stabbed to death are done so by a close friend, spouse or criminal partner. Even then it's still only around 200-250 fatalities a year. Once you strip it out to people being killed by someone they don't know you start approaching 30-50 deaths a year, which is on a par with fork lift accidents or carbon monoxide poisoning. Whilst that's nearly 10x the number of people being killed by cows or 2-3x those by dogs approx 0.005% of total UK mortality from strangers stabbing you is hardly as terrifying as it sounds. I've recently seen a cow trending on Twitter though, so that does gives me the heebie-jeebies. Best we never mention iatrogenic causes of death I guess, since the media has seen fit not to.
The Iatrogenic stat. The elephant in the room. About 1000000000x any one of these amplified 'dangers' we are encouraged to fear. You have to hand it to them.... they're not bad at what they do.
You don't have to be famous to get attention and preferential treatment from the government, police and press. You just have to belong to the right association the Jewish club.
You then realise which group controls the media and the government.
In the year ending December 2025, police recorded 49,151 stabbings.
Why is it headline news when two Jews are attacked? Keir Starmer gives an additional £25 million in funding for Jewish communities security plus free ambulances. The media also failed to mention a third person who was stabbed was a Muslim.
yes, what has been quite shocking for me is since October 7th how many commentators for whom support of Israel is their number 1 priority. And that would have remained under the surface but for this event. people like Dan Hodges Jullia HB, Laura Dodsworth Suzanne Moore, Julie Burchill and of course Allison Pearson. And most of the columnists for the times. It's their alpha and omega. In fact this support for Israel is as good a test as any for sorting out the genuine from the dodgy. I wonder what Lucy C makes of the Gaza situation, I think I can guess.
Absolutely. And the Zionist axis you mention is deeply inveigled in the Lucy Connolly operation. I understand that Allison Pearson is even ghostwriting her book!
I've just been watching our cat walking down the back alley. He's cool, and clearly relaxed - but he's also extremely aware - his eyes and ears on the constant alert for danger.
Does that latter point make him crazy? Paranoid even?
Of course it doesn't. He's perfectly centred and balanced. He instinctively knows that danger lurks everywhere, and is simply paying attention.
But hey, according to some, if us humans dare to develop a high sense of awareness - have an appropriate and well developed notion of the “hidden evils", we can't possibly remain balanced and centred, and are labelled "crazy", "paranoid" (and that's on a good day).
But, as Miri rightly points out, the "hidden evils" are very much real, as is their need to dominate and control others via any means whatsoever.
Some are hidden, some more tangible, and some right in your face (as explained in Miri's article)…
“Penetration into dark recesses: a great effort of will finds favour. At times, one has to deal with hidden evils: intangible influences that slink in dark corners and affect people by suggestion. One must trace these back to the most secret recesses in order to deal with them. The effort required is enormous, but worthwhile, for, only when such elusive influences are brought into the light of day and branded do they lose power over people.” I Ching, Wilhelm translation
Excellent article Miri and the photo of a lizard was a nice touch 👍🏻.
It was a great tactic by our overlords to install numerous 'thought leaders' on social media to manage the newly awake. As you say they were saying all the things many of us wanted to hear in order to gain trust for when it was needed to steer people towards or away from certain topics.
I remember last year when yourself, Francis & Leo were savaged by the freedom fighter attack dogs for having the temerity to question the Lucy Connolly 'story'. Those people fully outed themselves as state approved opposition accounts because not only were they backing the official LC narrative they were saying 'it's not that important anyway as things like digital ID are what we should all be focussing on'. So the government & media are fabricating a story about a mother spending 10 months in prison for a post on X in order to get the public to self-censor on social media and it isn't important? It definitely is.
Any social media account that says something can't be questioned or is off limits is a wrong 'un, as are any accounts that have over 30k 'followers' from posting photos of their garden.
However, if they regularly post photos of their legs we know they can be trusted 😀.
"It would, quite frankly, be a completely crazy conspiracy theory to believe the establishment wouldn’t infiltrate and dominate social media in this way."
The tactic of providing (creating, promoting) what are to come across as opposing factions is clever and a basic theme of this essay. Both faction attending to the same agenda.
This tactic has long been employed in the medical and hellth industrial complex. There are the critics who disparage and warn against pHARMaceutical drugs for being dangerous and harmful, so, instead push illness sufferers to "understand" that they are deficient in this or that named vitamin or mineral, which can be found in supplements or "enrichments" in their processed food-like products. Both factions' protocols seek to suppress and disrupt the body's natural means to heal and maintain balanced functioning.
THEY don't care which side you pick. They just keep people fearful and riled up.
Thanks Ron, and this is a very good point. I've just started to look into the supplements scam courtesy of the great work of Jamie Andrews. https://controlstudies.substack.com
Being in the thick of that 'movement' during these years, I would say there are 2 distinct categories. Those who are doing the controlling, and those who are pitifully easy to control (who have no idea that this is the case). Everyone freely donated their thoughts, reactions, feelings for a period of decades, via social media. Everyone is now completely and utterly predictable and profiled. If you were the one who held this data, it would be a piece of cake to corral the 'dissidents' any which way you wanted. The desire to belong to the 'in' group is not less for dissidents. I think it's more pronounced, given many in this cohort had lost the safety of their existing group and were flailing around trying to find a new tribe.
Thanks Anna, you're absolutely right and that's a key observation. The dissident class are often more isolated and lonely than the average person, thus making them more vulnerable to "in-group" control.
I most definitely had not noticed that re the outgroup being more prone to wanting to be in an ingroup, but it does make sense.
I read a book called "Connected" (which I have linked to below). It explains how we connect and mentioned that people have different social tastes which they illustrate with 3D models. Some people want to be in a group - some don't. I am DEFINITELY a don't.
My daughter is always telling me that there are lovely aspects of being in a friendship group (which I can believe) but, for me at least, I find there's too often too much dysfunctional behaviour for it to be worth it. Sure, it's fun to go to a party for an evening, but to hang out with the same insular group again and again drives me insane.
If you liked hanging out in a group (and I can imagine being a emotionally, socially functional person who would like this) I can see how group ejection would be awful.
For me, whether someone is awake or not is *way* less important than whether they are respectful. During 2020/2021, some people did things that, while I can appreciate were the product of their programming, were also extremely disrespectful to me. I have no idea if they realise that or not, but I do know I cannot be bothered with that sort of behaviour.
I certainly disagree with a lot of my friends about how the world works, the nature of reality, why people do what they do, what's really going on, etc., but I am not looking for friendships where people agree with me about everything. I am not sure that helps my thinking nor theirs. What I'd rather is people who treat me with respect and, if they perceive I am failing to do that to them, communicate the changes they need respectfully to me. This, however, I think might make me slightly eccentric.
I was reflecting on this to a friend years ago and said to him that a lot of people don't want to communicate and connect, they want to be validated and exchange statements the other person agrees with. In those instances, being with people who agree with you is essential. What concerns me, though, is I frequently don't even agree with myself about things I thought a few weeks ago, so how on earth can this be done unless you are denying parts of yourself and just repeating your version of "right think" to each other?
Finally, I wanted to say how, recently, I've noticed that, recently, in my father's side of the family, there is a change happening. I am not sure exactly why, but it seems that this "exchange of right think" isn't working for them anymore (and they were once INTO it). I am not sure if it's a change on earth, the fact one of them is dying (slowly and prematurely), a change in me creating a change in my experiences of them or a combination of all/some of those and some other things. What I strongly suspect, however, is that, just as the new societies that will form will be more humane, the same will apply to all relationships and this "you are in the group or you are out of the group" based on, from what I could tell, politics and abuse of power, has had its day.
Well, that was a good plan by the directors. A plan that seems only now is being pointed out. It makes sense, a sneaky plan like that. It has caused a bit of confusion to us consumers of alternative media (me anyway). The controllers never stop controlling. I loved your Amish piece and have received my book "The Amish" - yet to read. You reference the new on the scene, those helping us newly awakened in 2020, as infiltrators. What is it about David Icke? I don't think I'd heard of him prior to 2020 but hasn't he been around telling any who would listen, about the "agenda" etc, for 30 plus years? He lost me with lizard people and outer space stuff and I quickly moved on to other interesting truth-tellers. Most of his stuff is behind a paywall so I'm not motivated to pay to listen about his version of aliens. I dont know now though, what to think about shape shifters, for those who believe in hybrid people (Bible, angels mating with humans), maybe...? Is he an infiltrator? What about his sons? Too many questions. But I loved your explanation Miri and need to read it again as a quick reading with morning coffee before I head to work is giving it less attention than I need to consider it all.
Thank you, Scamitis, and I hope you enjoy your book!
David Icke in my opinion is far too famous to be anything other than compromised: the MSM simply do not bestow the level of attention they have on someone, regardless of whether it's negative (no such thing as bad publicity), that they have on him, unless they want people to know about that person. David has done some really good work (of course he has, nobody would listen to him if he hadn't), but is generally seen to muddy the waters with talk of lizard people that therefore "makes conspiracists look crazy". He doesn't agree that's what he's done, and says, "well, that's the truth, whether it makes me look crazy or not", but regardless, that is the effect, so if you say to a normie, "you know, I don't think vaccines are completely safe for everyone", they respond with something like, "oh, been reading David Icke again, have you? I suppose you think the Queen's a lizard too". Icke makes the whole "conspiracy" position dismissible, whether that is his intention or not.
As for his sons, I've had some minimal contact with them on social media and they seem ok - professional and polite, absolutely nothing like the "dog pack" as described in my article - but ultimately seem to be limited hangout gatekeepers, who don't investigate the authenticity of media ops before reporting them as real, and just rehash the "approved alternative narrative" (i.e., Charlie Kirk was really assassinated, but it was Israel wot dunnit, etc).
Thanks for that explanation. It is true - in my estimation. Haha, all the scamdenic believers have the same answers to to dissenters - "oh, you get your news from the internet do you (Icke or other "cookers" or tinfoil hats etc). Dismissed immediately. Not sure where the pejorative "cookers" comes from. Is it only in Oz"? The instant dismissal is universal it seems. I didn't realise Icke's sons believe CK was really assassinated. Can't believe the world is actually so weird, it really is a stage, everything is "theatre". I met a new friend in 2020 both of us fully Trump lovers, anti-vax and non-believers in the convid. As soon as Trump said warpspeed, scales fell from my eyes and changed everything. She somehow, has forgiven him, and he's the saviour again in her eyes. The suddenness that my eyes opened with that word now makes me wonder if it isn't a mind control thing. Could warpspeed be a trigger word? Your post has made me wonder about the depth of control going on and to what end.
I have had quite a few "supernatural" (for want of a better word) experiences and I definitely think that there's something supernatural about the cabal's coordination.
I suspect David Icke is sincere in what he says and, IMO, it's *way* easier for controllers to promote and deride than it is to create and control. Whether, however, there's some problematic nature to his inspiration/way of operating, I don't know, however, whenever I've heard him speak, he strikes me as stuck and angry and sad rather than anything else. I know he says he was spoken to by disembodied voices and told that people will be talking about his experience for years to come. There's nothing to say those were entirely benevolent beings and, IMO, even though he woke a lot of people up, many of those people went back "to sleep" and I wonder if that was because there was an issue with what he was doing. I am not sure.
At the start of the whole 2020 thing, a cousin's husband said to me on Facebook (after I had commented on something making jokes about Icke fans' views of Bill Gates), "So, who do you believe, Bill Gates or David Icke?" and I was like "WHAT? Those are the only two options that I am allowed to have? No other reality exists? I can't come to my own conclusions?" He was one of those people who had a circle around his Facebook profile picture saying something like "I am questioning of authority and I am vaccinated". I mean, what a numpty (and what a well-shaped trap to capture him using his vanity).
I think Icke has been used as a way to dismiss any dissent for a long time, however, I don't think it's working any more. I think my cousin's husband just looked like an ignorant, overbearing arsehole when he asked me who I believed (not to mention quite an old-school, sexist patriarch - something he'd HATE to be accused of). So much of the valid stuff Icke says is now basically mainstream. The issues with the financial system, medical system, war, global politics, etc. I would even say most "normies" would agree with a lot of this.
Anyway, to answer your question re "cookers", I have never heard anyone use that here (UK) nor in NZ (where we were for a while). We are, however, looking to relocate to Australia in a year or so, so it's great to know this vocabulary!
Cheers Rosie. Yes, do keep an eye out for "cookers". I don't know why or how that term came to be in use, but by the context it is definitely an attempt to insult. Do you know where in Australia you will relocate to?
All your articles are excellent Miri, this one is absolutely amazing. Along with James Delingpole, Bob Moran, Peter Duke..,, you open our minds and you do it so well.
The only article I didn't respond to was the one about Israel as the origin of the evil that is engulfing us in nonsense and senseless wars further and faster... This evil is much older than the Jews, even if the horrors we are witnessing point at them in so many ways.
I am a Catholic, but I now have serious doubts about the Vatican's activities too.
Thank you, Thalie. I agree there is a malevolent force that predates the Jews, but there is nevertheless a disproportionate Jewish aspect to "the conspiracy". I am also Catholic by birth and unfortunately I think the Catholic Church is completely infiltrated and corrupted and that that has been the case since at least Vatican II.
The down side about putting in a title to catch readers but not following up on it is that you may disappoint. Where's Icke? But then again Mr Delingpole covered that one.
That's the thing with "click-bait" - it definitely works! This article has already had the same number of views in a day that my Amish one had in a week... But one must use it discerningly and sparingly, since as you say, otherwise you risk annoying readers. I actually went to the James Delingpole v David Icke talk live, I thought it was good, and gave a lot of insight into the respective characters.
Sometimes I am stunned by how robust your character is. I couldn't even watch it on video - I found the whole thing way too painful - a slow car crash of a social breakdown. I admire you!
Yes but whilst I understand some of these false flag attacks are fake I remember a tv crew going to Southport for anniversary of the 3 little girls killed. Teachers spoke on it so surely they wouldn’t lie about something so terrible to people
Were they actors teachers or were they real teachers? The right answer on this question would know only a handful people. But millions believed the story was real, another millions believed it was fake. To make people to do harm to other people just out of believe is the real purpose for such events to be promoted to the masses - either fake or edited. For to promote an illusion is cheep but to gain the real result that the promoters wished for is very profitable business. And they will not stop until they get all reality in their hands - All of it.
Brilliant piece once again Miri and not just because of the big name (I too often look at the Amish and ponder "What's not to like?"). Unpopular opinion but knife crime in the UK falls into the same category. Overwhelmingly most people stabbed to death are done so by a close friend, spouse or criminal partner. Even then it's still only around 200-250 fatalities a year. Once you strip it out to people being killed by someone they don't know you start approaching 30-50 deaths a year, which is on a par with fork lift accidents or carbon monoxide poisoning. Whilst that's nearly 10x the number of people being killed by cows or 2-3x those by dogs approx 0.005% of total UK mortality from strangers stabbing you is hardly as terrifying as it sounds. I've recently seen a cow trending on Twitter though, so that does gives me the heebie-jeebies. Best we never mention iatrogenic causes of death I guess, since the media has seen fit not to.
Thank you, Leo, great points.
The Iatrogenic stat. The elephant in the room. About 1000000000x any one of these amplified 'dangers' we are encouraged to fear. You have to hand it to them.... they're not bad at what they do.
You don't have to be famous to get attention and preferential treatment from the government, police and press. You just have to belong to the right association the Jewish club.
You then realise which group controls the media and the government.
In the year ending December 2025, police recorded 49,151 stabbings.
Why is it headline news when two Jews are attacked? Keir Starmer gives an additional £25 million in funding for Jewish communities security plus free ambulances. The media also failed to mention a third person who was stabbed was a Muslim.
Quite so. I've written about this extensively:
https://miri.substack.com/p/prepare-for-antisemitic-psyop-season
https://miri.substack.com/p/purple-reign
https://miri.substack.com/p/jew-diligence
not just here, Australia ran with that as its lead story for 24 hours.
yes, what has been quite shocking for me is since October 7th how many commentators for whom support of Israel is their number 1 priority. And that would have remained under the surface but for this event. people like Dan Hodges Jullia HB, Laura Dodsworth Suzanne Moore, Julie Burchill and of course Allison Pearson. And most of the columnists for the times. It's their alpha and omega. In fact this support for Israel is as good a test as any for sorting out the genuine from the dodgy. I wonder what Lucy C makes of the Gaza situation, I think I can guess.
Absolutely. And the Zionist axis you mention is deeply inveigled in the Lucy Connolly operation. I understand that Allison Pearson is even ghostwriting her book!
The Telegraph
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/telegraph-and-politico-owner-says-journalists-must-support-israel-or-resign
I've just been watching our cat walking down the back alley. He's cool, and clearly relaxed - but he's also extremely aware - his eyes and ears on the constant alert for danger.
Does that latter point make him crazy? Paranoid even?
Of course it doesn't. He's perfectly centred and balanced. He instinctively knows that danger lurks everywhere, and is simply paying attention.
But hey, according to some, if us humans dare to develop a high sense of awareness - have an appropriate and well developed notion of the “hidden evils", we can't possibly remain balanced and centred, and are labelled "crazy", "paranoid" (and that's on a good day).
But, as Miri rightly points out, the "hidden evils" are very much real, as is their need to dominate and control others via any means whatsoever.
Some are hidden, some more tangible, and some right in your face (as explained in Miri's article)…
“Penetration into dark recesses: a great effort of will finds favour. At times, one has to deal with hidden evils: intangible influences that slink in dark corners and affect people by suggestion. One must trace these back to the most secret recesses in order to deal with them. The effort required is enormous, but worthwhile, for, only when such elusive influences are brought into the light of day and branded do they lose power over people.” I Ching, Wilhelm translation
More here: https://markfinch223151.substack.com/p/agenda-gatekeepers?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=qmo35
David Icke is a clown. He exposes himself as a clown no circus would hire. I liked your Amish article. Keep up the good work.
Excellent article Miri and the photo of a lizard was a nice touch 👍🏻.
It was a great tactic by our overlords to install numerous 'thought leaders' on social media to manage the newly awake. As you say they were saying all the things many of us wanted to hear in order to gain trust for when it was needed to steer people towards or away from certain topics.
I remember last year when yourself, Francis & Leo were savaged by the freedom fighter attack dogs for having the temerity to question the Lucy Connolly 'story'. Those people fully outed themselves as state approved opposition accounts because not only were they backing the official LC narrative they were saying 'it's not that important anyway as things like digital ID are what we should all be focussing on'. So the government & media are fabricating a story about a mother spending 10 months in prison for a post on X in order to get the public to self-censor on social media and it isn't important? It definitely is.
Any social media account that says something can't be questioned or is off limits is a wrong 'un, as are any accounts that have over 30k 'followers' from posting photos of their garden.
However, if they regularly post photos of their legs we know they can be trusted 😀.
Ha, quite so! Thanks Mick, excellent observations as ever.
"It would, quite frankly, be a completely crazy conspiracy theory to believe the establishment wouldn’t infiltrate and dominate social media in this way."
Great line. And great post. Thanks!
Thanks Dawn!
The tactic of providing (creating, promoting) what are to come across as opposing factions is clever and a basic theme of this essay. Both faction attending to the same agenda.
This tactic has long been employed in the medical and hellth industrial complex. There are the critics who disparage and warn against pHARMaceutical drugs for being dangerous and harmful, so, instead push illness sufferers to "understand" that they are deficient in this or that named vitamin or mineral, which can be found in supplements or "enrichments" in their processed food-like products. Both factions' protocols seek to suppress and disrupt the body's natural means to heal and maintain balanced functioning.
THEY don't care which side you pick. They just keep people fearful and riled up.
Thanks Ron, and this is a very good point. I've just started to look into the supplements scam courtesy of the great work of Jamie Andrews. https://controlstudies.substack.com
Yes. Don’t take that pill, take this pill. It’s bollox
A most welcome post on the daily drivel the media subjected us to.
Although, every time I see a photo of Tony Blair, I do wonder if that Icke chap might be onto something with his Lizard People.
I had lunch at a really expensive hotel and there lying on a rock in the sun was Hilary Clinton
I wonder what they would have said if you'd asked for your money back due to the toxic company?
Being in the thick of that 'movement' during these years, I would say there are 2 distinct categories. Those who are doing the controlling, and those who are pitifully easy to control (who have no idea that this is the case). Everyone freely donated their thoughts, reactions, feelings for a period of decades, via social media. Everyone is now completely and utterly predictable and profiled. If you were the one who held this data, it would be a piece of cake to corral the 'dissidents' any which way you wanted. The desire to belong to the 'in' group is not less for dissidents. I think it's more pronounced, given many in this cohort had lost the safety of their existing group and were flailing around trying to find a new tribe.
Thanks Anna, you're absolutely right and that's a key observation. The dissident class are often more isolated and lonely than the average person, thus making them more vulnerable to "in-group" control.
I most definitely had not noticed that re the outgroup being more prone to wanting to be in an ingroup, but it does make sense.
I read a book called "Connected" (which I have linked to below). It explains how we connect and mentioned that people have different social tastes which they illustrate with 3D models. Some people want to be in a group - some don't. I am DEFINITELY a don't.
My daughter is always telling me that there are lovely aspects of being in a friendship group (which I can believe) but, for me at least, I find there's too often too much dysfunctional behaviour for it to be worth it. Sure, it's fun to go to a party for an evening, but to hang out with the same insular group again and again drives me insane.
If you liked hanging out in a group (and I can imagine being a emotionally, socially functional person who would like this) I can see how group ejection would be awful.
For me, whether someone is awake or not is *way* less important than whether they are respectful. During 2020/2021, some people did things that, while I can appreciate were the product of their programming, were also extremely disrespectful to me. I have no idea if they realise that or not, but I do know I cannot be bothered with that sort of behaviour.
I certainly disagree with a lot of my friends about how the world works, the nature of reality, why people do what they do, what's really going on, etc., but I am not looking for friendships where people agree with me about everything. I am not sure that helps my thinking nor theirs. What I'd rather is people who treat me with respect and, if they perceive I am failing to do that to them, communicate the changes they need respectfully to me. This, however, I think might make me slightly eccentric.
I was reflecting on this to a friend years ago and said to him that a lot of people don't want to communicate and connect, they want to be validated and exchange statements the other person agrees with. In those instances, being with people who agree with you is essential. What concerns me, though, is I frequently don't even agree with myself about things I thought a few weeks ago, so how on earth can this be done unless you are denying parts of yourself and just repeating your version of "right think" to each other?
Finally, I wanted to say how, recently, I've noticed that, recently, in my father's side of the family, there is a change happening. I am not sure exactly why, but it seems that this "exchange of right think" isn't working for them anymore (and they were once INTO it). I am not sure if it's a change on earth, the fact one of them is dying (slowly and prematurely), a change in me creating a change in my experiences of them or a combination of all/some of those and some other things. What I strongly suspect, however, is that, just as the new societies that will form will be more humane, the same will apply to all relationships and this "you are in the group or you are out of the group" based on, from what I could tell, politics and abuse of power, has had its day.
(https://www.worldofbooks.com/en-gb/products/connected-book-nicholas-a-christakis-9780316036146?sku=GOR005284453&msclkid=c430b2420721166b7bb4dbb9124b4763&utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=World+of+Books+-+GBR+-+Bing+-+pMax+-+GOR+-+EN+-+XX+-+Used+Books+-+SalesRank%3A+Undefined&utm_term=2323680387227672&utm_content=Undefined)
Well, that was a good plan by the directors. A plan that seems only now is being pointed out. It makes sense, a sneaky plan like that. It has caused a bit of confusion to us consumers of alternative media (me anyway). The controllers never stop controlling. I loved your Amish piece and have received my book "The Amish" - yet to read. You reference the new on the scene, those helping us newly awakened in 2020, as infiltrators. What is it about David Icke? I don't think I'd heard of him prior to 2020 but hasn't he been around telling any who would listen, about the "agenda" etc, for 30 plus years? He lost me with lizard people and outer space stuff and I quickly moved on to other interesting truth-tellers. Most of his stuff is behind a paywall so I'm not motivated to pay to listen about his version of aliens. I dont know now though, what to think about shape shifters, for those who believe in hybrid people (Bible, angels mating with humans), maybe...? Is he an infiltrator? What about his sons? Too many questions. But I loved your explanation Miri and need to read it again as a quick reading with morning coffee before I head to work is giving it less attention than I need to consider it all.
Thank you, Scamitis, and I hope you enjoy your book!
David Icke in my opinion is far too famous to be anything other than compromised: the MSM simply do not bestow the level of attention they have on someone, regardless of whether it's negative (no such thing as bad publicity), that they have on him, unless they want people to know about that person. David has done some really good work (of course he has, nobody would listen to him if he hadn't), but is generally seen to muddy the waters with talk of lizard people that therefore "makes conspiracists look crazy". He doesn't agree that's what he's done, and says, "well, that's the truth, whether it makes me look crazy or not", but regardless, that is the effect, so if you say to a normie, "you know, I don't think vaccines are completely safe for everyone", they respond with something like, "oh, been reading David Icke again, have you? I suppose you think the Queen's a lizard too". Icke makes the whole "conspiracy" position dismissible, whether that is his intention or not.
As for his sons, I've had some minimal contact with them on social media and they seem ok - professional and polite, absolutely nothing like the "dog pack" as described in my article - but ultimately seem to be limited hangout gatekeepers, who don't investigate the authenticity of media ops before reporting them as real, and just rehash the "approved alternative narrative" (i.e., Charlie Kirk was really assassinated, but it was Israel wot dunnit, etc).
Thanks for that explanation. It is true - in my estimation. Haha, all the scamdenic believers have the same answers to to dissenters - "oh, you get your news from the internet do you (Icke or other "cookers" or tinfoil hats etc). Dismissed immediately. Not sure where the pejorative "cookers" comes from. Is it only in Oz"? The instant dismissal is universal it seems. I didn't realise Icke's sons believe CK was really assassinated. Can't believe the world is actually so weird, it really is a stage, everything is "theatre". I met a new friend in 2020 both of us fully Trump lovers, anti-vax and non-believers in the convid. As soon as Trump said warpspeed, scales fell from my eyes and changed everything. She somehow, has forgiven him, and he's the saviour again in her eyes. The suddenness that my eyes opened with that word now makes me wonder if it isn't a mind control thing. Could warpspeed be a trigger word? Your post has made me wonder about the depth of control going on and to what end.
I have had quite a few "supernatural" (for want of a better word) experiences and I definitely think that there's something supernatural about the cabal's coordination.
I suspect David Icke is sincere in what he says and, IMO, it's *way* easier for controllers to promote and deride than it is to create and control. Whether, however, there's some problematic nature to his inspiration/way of operating, I don't know, however, whenever I've heard him speak, he strikes me as stuck and angry and sad rather than anything else. I know he says he was spoken to by disembodied voices and told that people will be talking about his experience for years to come. There's nothing to say those were entirely benevolent beings and, IMO, even though he woke a lot of people up, many of those people went back "to sleep" and I wonder if that was because there was an issue with what he was doing. I am not sure.
At the start of the whole 2020 thing, a cousin's husband said to me on Facebook (after I had commented on something making jokes about Icke fans' views of Bill Gates), "So, who do you believe, Bill Gates or David Icke?" and I was like "WHAT? Those are the only two options that I am allowed to have? No other reality exists? I can't come to my own conclusions?" He was one of those people who had a circle around his Facebook profile picture saying something like "I am questioning of authority and I am vaccinated". I mean, what a numpty (and what a well-shaped trap to capture him using his vanity).
I think Icke has been used as a way to dismiss any dissent for a long time, however, I don't think it's working any more. I think my cousin's husband just looked like an ignorant, overbearing arsehole when he asked me who I believed (not to mention quite an old-school, sexist patriarch - something he'd HATE to be accused of). So much of the valid stuff Icke says is now basically mainstream. The issues with the financial system, medical system, war, global politics, etc. I would even say most "normies" would agree with a lot of this.
Anyway, to answer your question re "cookers", I have never heard anyone use that here (UK) nor in NZ (where we were for a while). We are, however, looking to relocate to Australia in a year or so, so it's great to know this vocabulary!
Cheers Rosie. Yes, do keep an eye out for "cookers". I don't know why or how that term came to be in use, but by the context it is definitely an attempt to insult. Do you know where in Australia you will relocate to?
All your articles are excellent Miri, this one is absolutely amazing. Along with James Delingpole, Bob Moran, Peter Duke..,, you open our minds and you do it so well.
The only article I didn't respond to was the one about Israel as the origin of the evil that is engulfing us in nonsense and senseless wars further and faster... This evil is much older than the Jews, even if the horrors we are witnessing point at them in so many ways.
I am a Catholic, but I now have serious doubts about the Vatican's activities too.
Thank you, Thalie. I agree there is a malevolent force that predates the Jews, but there is nevertheless a disproportionate Jewish aspect to "the conspiracy". I am also Catholic by birth and unfortunately I think the Catholic Church is completely infiltrated and corrupted and that that has been the case since at least Vatican II.
I totally agree with you.
I now refer to Them as gangsters masquerading as Jews and not all of Them are Jews. Blair being a prime example.
The down side about putting in a title to catch readers but not following up on it is that you may disappoint. Where's Icke? But then again Mr Delingpole covered that one.
Which kinda reminds me of a cheeky poster on a college wall which said:
"Will SEX cause blindness?"
And underneath it in small print:
"Of course not. But it gives us the chance to say SEX again!"
That's the thing with "click-bait" - it definitely works! This article has already had the same number of views in a day that my Amish one had in a week... But one must use it discerningly and sparingly, since as you say, otherwise you risk annoying readers. I actually went to the James Delingpole v David Icke talk live, I thought it was good, and gave a lot of insight into the respective characters.
Sometimes I am stunned by how robust your character is. I couldn't even watch it on video - I found the whole thing way too painful - a slow car crash of a social breakdown. I admire you!
Yes but whilst I understand some of these false flag attacks are fake I remember a tv crew going to Southport for anniversary of the 3 little girls killed. Teachers spoke on it so surely they wouldn’t lie about something so terrible to people
Were they actors teachers or were they real teachers? The right answer on this question would know only a handful people. But millions believed the story was real, another millions believed it was fake. To make people to do harm to other people just out of believe is the real purpose for such events to be promoted to the masses - either fake or edited. For to promote an illusion is cheep but to gain the real result that the promoters wished for is very profitable business. And they will not stop until they get all reality in their hands - All of it.
Maybe this is it?
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/are-farmers-actually-finding-boxes-of-ticks-in-the-midwest-the-viral-social-media-claim-explained/3929662/