It’s all so tiresome, not that I follow any of the clown circus anymore, I didn’t even know who the Means siblings were until I read your article & that’s the way I like it! I find it quite depressing how so many people who saw through convid & the lethal injections still think they can vote their way out of tyranny and believe in big name saviours like Trump. It’s beyond obvious now that everything projected onto the screen is scripted theatre but so few of us can see it, I doubt we make up 1%?
Yes, it is frustrating, and the problem I think lies with the fact that, neurologically, we can't distinguish between actors on screens and people in front of us. Our brains respond the same way, which is why we develop attachments to soap stars, even when we objectively know they're fictional and that we'll never even meet the actor playing them, never mind the character we are fond of. So it takes quite a concerted effort to override our instinctive wiring to treat familiar faces on screens as friends, and use our reason and logic instead. But it's a process, and as you say, even seeing through a handful of actors and liars doesn't reliably engender people to see through ALL of them, because they'll say, "oh right, so literally every person in the public eye is a liar and a deceiver and we literally can't trust any of them?" - and they do not want to hear that the answer is yes! (Which, as I've pointed out many times, is very different and distinct to saying you can't trust "anyone" - just not anyone with a significant public/media profile. If you know their name, they're in the game...)
The semi awake are missing out because once you can see that it’s ALL scripted it is akin to a comedy show or more accurately of late like watching Idiocracy!
Me & my only properly awake friend Kate get so many laughs out of dispassionately observing the latest (now daily) nonsense. I really feel that laughing at it is so powerful because it’s the very last emotion they want from us
Yep Miri, my (four years ago!) ex-missus has said to me over the last five years, with a cynical grimace: "don't you like anyone?", when I berated the usual world-stage-actor suspects.
I didn't , but should have said: " No, just ALL politicians; ALL mainstream news-media (and a lot of 'alternative' media); Big Pharma advocates and pushers; most TV actors; nearly all celebs and religious leaders".
I've long since stopped trying to open the eyes of those that don't want them, or too frightened to open them.
As my old Mam used to say: "there's none so blind as those that don't want to see"
Your readers may also be interested in this interview with Debbie Lerman, a US investigative medical reporter who opines that, unexpectedly introduced in a major speech by RFK, Calley and Casey Means are here to promote the idea that COVID was a public health response, not a military one and mRNA jabs aren't a problem.
Thanks Kevin, and that fits with my predictions too. If RFK does call out vaccines at all, he'll focus on the aluminium adjuvants, and say they are causing all the problems, but we don't need them any more, because we have "safe" mRNA instead.
Your piece got me thinking about other potential intelligence assets & The Hitchens brothers came to mind. I was a huge fan of Christopher when I was a deluded atheist & a minor fan of Peter in the early days of the plandemic. Peter’s volte-face surrender as soon as the lethal injections were rolled out was so puzzling to us at the time but now it’s all so bleeding obvious! Peter was ALLOWED to be the voice of lockdown scepticism but that’s where his limited hangout ended. With regards to Christopher it was always difficult to understand his volte-face and sudden support for the Neo Cons & war in Iraq after 9-11 but that’s also so bleeding obvious now we can see the zeroes and ones, he was given a new script to read!!
The Hitchens brother’s father was a Navy officer & Christopher went to Oxford. Both brothers were initially hard leftists. I’d bet my house they were / still are assets
Thanks Deenzy, very interesting. I'm sure you're right about them. I was never really into Christopher, but when I first had my political (if not conspiratorial) awakening and realised I was not a liberal, I was quite a fan of Peter. That all obviously ended with the Covid vaccine endorsement, which was so sly and revealing. Even if he honestly felt he had to have it "to travel", there was absolutely no reason for him to share this fact with his large readership. He could have used his platform to promote medical privacy and autonomy and said his vaccine status was nobody else's business, which would be more in keeping with his brand. But to be one of the first to shout from the rooftops that he'd had it - therefore providing a massive advertisement and and endorsement for it - was an undeniable reveal of who he really is.
His name came up in the comments on my MMR article too, as he was allowed to speak out about that in the Daily Mail, which - if my predictions are correct - may have been a carefully curated op to leave anti-vaxxers with egg on their faces.
I’m all for people being motivated to improve their physical fitness but there seems to be an increasing amount of people that are happy to base their life on their ‘wearable’ health monitor, obsessed with their ‘body battery levels’ and ‘step counts’. One person told me they felt good but was worried as their monitor told them they wasn’t getting enough sleep! The reliance on these devices is very dangerous (and planned as we all know) and will no doubt increase further in the coming years.
The political theatre, in the UK and US, has become even more noticeably scripted lately with terrible actors working from predictable scripts. Knowing what he knows, the fact that RFK Jr has still not torn up the childhood vaccine schedule is the most blatant example of someone being captured/playing a role.
I didn’t know much about Casey Means. Her appointment as Surgeon General is bizarre (or maybe not these days) given her medical background.
I love your description of TV doctors that ‘generally ponce about on TV telling the rest of us what to do’. They play such an important role in pushing agendas as the public practically invite them into their living rooms as they sit on comfy sofas in the tv studio showing how much they care about us. They could have TV neurologists called Dr Dee Mentia and Dr Al Zheimer and the public would still trust their advice.
Thanks for another thought provoking and insightful article, it’s much appreciated 👍🏻
Thank you, Mick, and you raise some very interesting and accurate points. Although I do not own any biowearables, I do have a step counter on my phone (that I didn't ask for or install, it was just there, which is obviously suspicious in itself). A few years ago, I got a bit obsessed with it, and doing 12,000 steps a day. Although this isn't too excessive for someone with robust knees, alas, that is not me, and I have a history of torn ACLs in both knees, so after a few months of this "healthy" habit, my knees were starting to really hurt, and eventually, one basically stopped working altogether, at which point I was diagnosed with a torn meniscus and literally couldn't walk at all for a while... It was only at that point I began to re-evaluate whether I really "had" to walk 12,000 steps a day in order to "keep up my streak on the app"....
I can therefore see exactly how monitoring one's health via device is easily going to become addictive to a lot of people, and while such an addiction may ostensibly seem benign when compared to an addiction to drugs or gambling etc., it will turn a lot of people into neurotic messes. There's obviously an important balance to strike between caring about one's health, and becoming a hypochondriac - for instance, I have often opined that the best solution to high blood pressure is to stop measuring it.... Also, I'm sure many people would happily live healthy long lives, never knowing they "had cancer", if it wasn't for all the NHS relentless screening programmes - which of course will increase exponentially once biowearable tech becomes the norm.
You are quite right about RFK, of course. I saw a meme saying "if you're poisoning kids as part of your "5D Chess" strategy, then the game is over. You lost."
Very true about the "TV doctors" (excellent names!) and how enraptured the public are by them. It's obvious that doctors rank very highly as useful assets to "them", and perhaps more intelligence recruitment goes on at the medical schools than even Oxford PPE. Consider the immense media psyop that is Madeleine McCann. What - out of all possible professions - do her parents do? They're doctors...
I hope your knees are back to 100% now. As you say, the wearables are highly addictive but the built in recommendations for things like step counts do not take into account potential issues that could be caused to individuals with prior injuries. We are all the best judge of what is good for our own health (sometimes we have to be brutally honest with ourselves) but the trend now is to ignore our instincts and outsource all personal responsibility to apps, 'experts', influencers and most dangerous of all, doctors!
Yes they are, thank you. I can do 6000-8000 steps a day without creating problems, but I've realised that it's when I encroach into the 8,000-10,000+ category, that the injuries start to flare up. As such, I have even wondered whether the "10,000 steps a day" meme is so relentlessly pushed BECAUSE it aggravates knee injuries (which of course are very common), and therefore, it's to cause us to ultimately become less active and more reliant on medications, as we keep re-aggravating injuries. As you probably know, "10k steps a day" was not based on any solid science, and was merely a marketing gimmick to sell a pedometer. All the health benefits of walking are available at around the 6k mark.
As you correctly state, our bodies always tell us exactly what is good and bad for us - our only job is to listen!
Thank you, Tanja, and yes, laughter is extremely important, as revealed by the ostensible children's film, Monsters Inc. In that film, an evil race of beasts terrorise children in order to feed off the energy the children's fear produces But when the children stop being afraid, and laugh at them instead, their whole evil empire crumbles. This tells us a lot!
It’s all so tiresome, not that I follow any of the clown circus anymore, I didn’t even know who the Means siblings were until I read your article & that’s the way I like it! I find it quite depressing how so many people who saw through convid & the lethal injections still think they can vote their way out of tyranny and believe in big name saviours like Trump. It’s beyond obvious now that everything projected onto the screen is scripted theatre but so few of us can see it, I doubt we make up 1%?
Yes, it is frustrating, and the problem I think lies with the fact that, neurologically, we can't distinguish between actors on screens and people in front of us. Our brains respond the same way, which is why we develop attachments to soap stars, even when we objectively know they're fictional and that we'll never even meet the actor playing them, never mind the character we are fond of. So it takes quite a concerted effort to override our instinctive wiring to treat familiar faces on screens as friends, and use our reason and logic instead. But it's a process, and as you say, even seeing through a handful of actors and liars doesn't reliably engender people to see through ALL of them, because they'll say, "oh right, so literally every person in the public eye is a liar and a deceiver and we literally can't trust any of them?" - and they do not want to hear that the answer is yes! (Which, as I've pointed out many times, is very different and distinct to saying you can't trust "anyone" - just not anyone with a significant public/media profile. If you know their name, they're in the game...)
The semi awake are missing out because once you can see that it’s ALL scripted it is akin to a comedy show or more accurately of late like watching Idiocracy!
Me & my only properly awake friend Kate get so many laughs out of dispassionately observing the latest (now daily) nonsense. I really feel that laughing at it is so powerful because it’s the very last emotion they want from us
Yep Miri, my (four years ago!) ex-missus has said to me over the last five years, with a cynical grimace: "don't you like anyone?", when I berated the usual world-stage-actor suspects.
I didn't , but should have said: " No, just ALL politicians; ALL mainstream news-media (and a lot of 'alternative' media); Big Pharma advocates and pushers; most TV actors; nearly all celebs and religious leaders".
I've long since stopped trying to open the eyes of those that don't want them, or too frightened to open them.
As my old Mam used to say: "there's none so blind as those that don't want to see"
Laser focused Miri. Thanks for exposing more of their ways and Means.
Thank you, Trevor, and excellent word play!
https://conspiracysarah.substack.com/p/heres-what-this-means?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email.....
....... A bit more on the Means project. Same shit different day, I guess.
And, is everyone dying from the shots. Or is there still the odd spontaneous death, like back in the day.?
https://mickeyz.substack.com/p/some-clarification-on-died-suddenly
Maybe we're all loaded with accumulated poisonous crap from years ago....
https://mestuff.substack.com/p/stacked-damage
As for Donny Orange and the The Bobster ---
-- It's all just so tiring, trying to keep up:
Groundhog Day.
The Trump/Truman Show.
Keeping up with the Kennedy's.
America's Next Surgeon General.
Extreme Makeover.
Make America Myopic Again.....
Your readers may also be interested in this interview with Debbie Lerman, a US investigative medical reporter who opines that, unexpectedly introduced in a major speech by RFK, Calley and Casey Means are here to promote the idea that COVID was a public health response, not a military one and mRNA jabs aren't a problem.
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/debbie-lerman-calleycasey-means-are
Thanks Kevin, and that fits with my predictions too. If RFK does call out vaccines at all, he'll focus on the aluminium adjuvants, and say they are causing all the problems, but we don't need them any more, because we have "safe" mRNA instead.
Putting 'a stra ze neca' into Google Translate as Latin; the English version reads 'a road to death'!
Your piece got me thinking about other potential intelligence assets & The Hitchens brothers came to mind. I was a huge fan of Christopher when I was a deluded atheist & a minor fan of Peter in the early days of the plandemic. Peter’s volte-face surrender as soon as the lethal injections were rolled out was so puzzling to us at the time but now it’s all so bleeding obvious! Peter was ALLOWED to be the voice of lockdown scepticism but that’s where his limited hangout ended. With regards to Christopher it was always difficult to understand his volte-face and sudden support for the Neo Cons & war in Iraq after 9-11 but that’s also so bleeding obvious now we can see the zeroes and ones, he was given a new script to read!!
The Hitchens brother’s father was a Navy officer & Christopher went to Oxford. Both brothers were initially hard leftists. I’d bet my house they were / still are assets
Thanks Deenzy, very interesting. I'm sure you're right about them. I was never really into Christopher, but when I first had my political (if not conspiratorial) awakening and realised I was not a liberal, I was quite a fan of Peter. That all obviously ended with the Covid vaccine endorsement, which was so sly and revealing. Even if he honestly felt he had to have it "to travel", there was absolutely no reason for him to share this fact with his large readership. He could have used his platform to promote medical privacy and autonomy and said his vaccine status was nobody else's business, which would be more in keeping with his brand. But to be one of the first to shout from the rooftops that he'd had it - therefore providing a massive advertisement and and endorsement for it - was an undeniable reveal of who he really is.
His name came up in the comments on my MMR article too, as he was allowed to speak out about that in the Daily Mail, which - if my predictions are correct - may have been a carefully curated op to leave anti-vaxxers with egg on their faces.
https://miri.substack.com/p/what-if-the-mmr-really-doesnt-cause
I’m all for people being motivated to improve their physical fitness but there seems to be an increasing amount of people that are happy to base their life on their ‘wearable’ health monitor, obsessed with their ‘body battery levels’ and ‘step counts’. One person told me they felt good but was worried as their monitor told them they wasn’t getting enough sleep! The reliance on these devices is very dangerous (and planned as we all know) and will no doubt increase further in the coming years.
The political theatre, in the UK and US, has become even more noticeably scripted lately with terrible actors working from predictable scripts. Knowing what he knows, the fact that RFK Jr has still not torn up the childhood vaccine schedule is the most blatant example of someone being captured/playing a role.
I didn’t know much about Casey Means. Her appointment as Surgeon General is bizarre (or maybe not these days) given her medical background.
I love your description of TV doctors that ‘generally ponce about on TV telling the rest of us what to do’. They play such an important role in pushing agendas as the public practically invite them into their living rooms as they sit on comfy sofas in the tv studio showing how much they care about us. They could have TV neurologists called Dr Dee Mentia and Dr Al Zheimer and the public would still trust their advice.
Thanks for another thought provoking and insightful article, it’s much appreciated 👍🏻
Thank you, Mick, and you raise some very interesting and accurate points. Although I do not own any biowearables, I do have a step counter on my phone (that I didn't ask for or install, it was just there, which is obviously suspicious in itself). A few years ago, I got a bit obsessed with it, and doing 12,000 steps a day. Although this isn't too excessive for someone with robust knees, alas, that is not me, and I have a history of torn ACLs in both knees, so after a few months of this "healthy" habit, my knees were starting to really hurt, and eventually, one basically stopped working altogether, at which point I was diagnosed with a torn meniscus and literally couldn't walk at all for a while... It was only at that point I began to re-evaluate whether I really "had" to walk 12,000 steps a day in order to "keep up my streak on the app"....
I can therefore see exactly how monitoring one's health via device is easily going to become addictive to a lot of people, and while such an addiction may ostensibly seem benign when compared to an addiction to drugs or gambling etc., it will turn a lot of people into neurotic messes. There's obviously an important balance to strike between caring about one's health, and becoming a hypochondriac - for instance, I have often opined that the best solution to high blood pressure is to stop measuring it.... Also, I'm sure many people would happily live healthy long lives, never knowing they "had cancer", if it wasn't for all the NHS relentless screening programmes - which of course will increase exponentially once biowearable tech becomes the norm.
You are quite right about RFK, of course. I saw a meme saying "if you're poisoning kids as part of your "5D Chess" strategy, then the game is over. You lost."
Very true about the "TV doctors" (excellent names!) and how enraptured the public are by them. It's obvious that doctors rank very highly as useful assets to "them", and perhaps more intelligence recruitment goes on at the medical schools than even Oxford PPE. Consider the immense media psyop that is Madeleine McCann. What - out of all possible professions - do her parents do? They're doctors...
I hope your knees are back to 100% now. As you say, the wearables are highly addictive but the built in recommendations for things like step counts do not take into account potential issues that could be caused to individuals with prior injuries. We are all the best judge of what is good for our own health (sometimes we have to be brutally honest with ourselves) but the trend now is to ignore our instincts and outsource all personal responsibility to apps, 'experts', influencers and most dangerous of all, doctors!
Yes they are, thank you. I can do 6000-8000 steps a day without creating problems, but I've realised that it's when I encroach into the 8,000-10,000+ category, that the injuries start to flare up. As such, I have even wondered whether the "10,000 steps a day" meme is so relentlessly pushed BECAUSE it aggravates knee injuries (which of course are very common), and therefore, it's to cause us to ultimately become less active and more reliant on medications, as we keep re-aggravating injuries. As you probably know, "10k steps a day" was not based on any solid science, and was merely a marketing gimmick to sell a pedometer. All the health benefits of walking are available at around the 6k mark.
As you correctly state, our bodies always tell us exactly what is good and bad for us - our only job is to listen!
Thank you Miri for your work, the story is depressing but for me to know my enemy is empowering.
We shall prevail, as Deenzy said let’s laugh at them.
Thank you, Tanja, and yes, laughter is extremely important, as revealed by the ostensible children's film, Monsters Inc. In that film, an evil race of beasts terrorise children in order to feed off the energy the children's fear produces But when the children stop being afraid, and laugh at them instead, their whole evil empire crumbles. This tells us a lot!
Don't know if you saw this Miri.
https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/the-imaginary-casey-means?publication_id=676930&post_id=163303295&isFreemail=false&r=2ydr8g&triedRedirect=true
I didn't, but it looks good! Just reading now, thanks...