I'm about to listen to your chat on my walk, Miri, but just to say on the subject of calling oneself a conspiracy theorist:
1. It's their term and it's used to gaslight
2. Sure conspiracies occur and you've got to be stupid not to think they do but the majority of the calling out of "controversial" conspiracies is for the particular type, psychological operations or psyops so why not use the more appropriate term? The thing is it's not that normies don't accept conspiracies at all, they'll accept conspiracies of graft and corruption laid bare in the media, they simply cannot accept fabricated news such as terror events pushed out as real and similar. As soon as blood and bandages are involved their brains turn to mush - in fact, even for some of those who are more awake blood and bandages have a mushing effect.
3. We don't call "conspiracy", we say "There's something wrong with the story." It's the anti-conspiracists who distort our criticism into "conspiracy theory".
4. "Theory" suggests an explanation based on thin grounds, however, as psyops always employ their Revelation of the Method technique where's the theory? If you know how to decode their RoM (or even if you just make 2 + 2 = 4 and don't accept 5) there's no theory, it's all laid bare before you.
I simply do not think of myself as a conspiracy theorist, I think of myself as a psyop analyst.
However, I see it differently... the term "conspiracy theorist" only has power as a pejorative if we continue to accept it as one. So, I reject the idea it is an insulting term and instead embrace it. I feel we should "reclaim" it, just as some black people have reclaimed the N-word, thereby stripping it of its negative power.
I feel the same about the term "anti-vaxxer". So many on our side tie themselves in knots denying they are "snti-vaccine" ("I just want safe vaccines", etc) when they should embrace it - yes, they are anti-vaccine, because vaccines are poison. To be anti them is not an insult, and nor is to be called a conspiracy theorist, for the reasons Dave Collum says.
As they say, "what you resist, persists" - so instead of resisting these terms (which confirms them as powerful pejoratives that the mainstream can use against us), I embrace them, and say, "yes, I am these things, and very proud of it, too!"
Really enjoyed your chat with Dom and Chris. Interesting about the Chinese 4-2-1 problem and the plan for the jab to age people and kill them off at a younger age rather than simply kill them quickly (although obviously that’s happening to some).
I read but don’t know how true it is that a great deal of the health budget goes on the first six months and the last six months of life so I wonder if rather that this hideous “eugenistic” control BS why not put less money into the first and last six months? Why not be slightly more ruthless about letting extremely expensive infant and late-stage lives go which is what happened before our very sophisticated medical system in preference to killing people how they’re doing it now.
Re CT term: I see your point, but my objection isn’t mainly that it’s pejorative but more that it often ill-describes the person / process of objecting to mainstream narratives, for example, to call a scientist who points out flaws in scientific papers related to virology a “conspiracy theorist” is just silly. They’re not saying anything about a conspiracy, they’re just saying the scientific method wasn’t followed. I think the term suggests that there aren’t people who criticise the narrative as credentialed as the apologists for the mainstream narrative, that it’s just “ordinary” people - not, of course, that I don’t think that a lot of “ordinary” people have got it right where supposed experts haven’t.
Of course, what I call myself - psyop analyst - isn’t appropriate for the critical scientist either.
I guess if you can get people to call you what you think are that’s the ideal. As I say I just don’t think of myself as a conspiracy theorist but rather a psyop analyst.
Great chat with the sheep farm guys. Thank you! It's all becoming somewhat overwhelming. No matter how much I learn (and I think I'm quite well down the 'hole') the enormity & scale - both in time & space - of what is being inflicted (and has been planned for so long) on humanity is almost superhuman, supernatural or quite outside our existing levels of perception. Keep going Miri. We must keep trying ...
Thank you, Steve. And you are quite right. There is a force at work behind all this that is not human and as many have said, ultimately, this is a spiritual battle.
I'm about to listen to your chat on my walk, Miri, but just to say on the subject of calling oneself a conspiracy theorist:
1. It's their term and it's used to gaslight
2. Sure conspiracies occur and you've got to be stupid not to think they do but the majority of the calling out of "controversial" conspiracies is for the particular type, psychological operations or psyops so why not use the more appropriate term? The thing is it's not that normies don't accept conspiracies at all, they'll accept conspiracies of graft and corruption laid bare in the media, they simply cannot accept fabricated news such as terror events pushed out as real and similar. As soon as blood and bandages are involved their brains turn to mush - in fact, even for some of those who are more awake blood and bandages have a mushing effect.
3. We don't call "conspiracy", we say "There's something wrong with the story." It's the anti-conspiracists who distort our criticism into "conspiracy theory".
4. "Theory" suggests an explanation based on thin grounds, however, as psyops always employ their Revelation of the Method technique where's the theory? If you know how to decode their RoM (or even if you just make 2 + 2 = 4 and don't accept 5) there's no theory, it's all laid bare before you.
I simply do not think of myself as a conspiracy theorist, I think of myself as a psyop analyst.
My magnum opus - 12 logical fallacies unmasked in the use of the terms "conspiracy theory" and "conspiracy theorist", https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/11-logical-fallacies-unmasked-in
Thanks Petra, all very valid points.
However, I see it differently... the term "conspiracy theorist" only has power as a pejorative if we continue to accept it as one. So, I reject the idea it is an insulting term and instead embrace it. I feel we should "reclaim" it, just as some black people have reclaimed the N-word, thereby stripping it of its negative power.
I feel the same about the term "anti-vaxxer". So many on our side tie themselves in knots denying they are "snti-vaccine" ("I just want safe vaccines", etc) when they should embrace it - yes, they are anti-vaccine, because vaccines are poison. To be anti them is not an insult, and nor is to be called a conspiracy theorist, for the reasons Dave Collum says.
As they say, "what you resist, persists" - so instead of resisting these terms (which confirms them as powerful pejoratives that the mainstream can use against us), I embrace them, and say, "yes, I am these things, and very proud of it, too!"
Really enjoyed your chat with Dom and Chris. Interesting about the Chinese 4-2-1 problem and the plan for the jab to age people and kill them off at a younger age rather than simply kill them quickly (although obviously that’s happening to some).
I read but don’t know how true it is that a great deal of the health budget goes on the first six months and the last six months of life so I wonder if rather that this hideous “eugenistic” control BS why not put less money into the first and last six months? Why not be slightly more ruthless about letting extremely expensive infant and late-stage lives go which is what happened before our very sophisticated medical system in preference to killing people how they’re doing it now.
Re CT term: I see your point, but my objection isn’t mainly that it’s pejorative but more that it often ill-describes the person / process of objecting to mainstream narratives, for example, to call a scientist who points out flaws in scientific papers related to virology a “conspiracy theorist” is just silly. They’re not saying anything about a conspiracy, they’re just saying the scientific method wasn’t followed. I think the term suggests that there aren’t people who criticise the narrative as credentialed as the apologists for the mainstream narrative, that it’s just “ordinary” people - not, of course, that I don’t think that a lot of “ordinary” people have got it right where supposed experts haven’t.
Of course, what I call myself - psyop analyst - isn’t appropriate for the critical scientist either.
I guess if you can get people to call you what you think are that’s the ideal. As I say I just don’t think of myself as a conspiracy theorist but rather a psyop analyst.
Great chat with the sheep farm guys. Thank you! It's all becoming somewhat overwhelming. No matter how much I learn (and I think I'm quite well down the 'hole') the enormity & scale - both in time & space - of what is being inflicted (and has been planned for so long) on humanity is almost superhuman, supernatural or quite outside our existing levels of perception. Keep going Miri. We must keep trying ...
Thank you, Steve. And you are quite right. There is a force at work behind all this that is not human and as many have said, ultimately, this is a spiritual battle.
Was great to listen to you 3 wonderful people Miri! What a treat! Thankyou 🫡
Thank you JD!
Really enjoyed that thank you. And hallelujah about the visible aging of people, I thought only I had noticed!
Thanks Heartland!
Great, thanks for that.