Cancer charities have been shaking their collecting tins for as long as I can remember and have gathered millions upon millions in donations. Imperial Cancer Research was founded in 1902 and over 120 years later have still not got any nearer to a real cure.
Radical Remission by Kelly Turner and Curing the Incurable by Dr Jerry Thompson are brilliant books on this topic. I'd also like to say that Cancer Research UK need to be reported to the ASA for saying in their advertising, "Together we're beating cancer". And while I'm on that topic, the BBC needs to be reported for advertising their TV licence with the strapline, "Nothing brings people together like TV."
My late father was an industrial chemist, and my mother was a pharmacist.
Both took chemistry rather seriously - it didn't rub off on me or my brother.
Dad had a life-long science based fascination with processed dilution steps. A mere mention of this around conventional biologists was enough to induce denunciation and a bit of carpet chewing.
Still, dad carried on for most of his adult life, reading, experimenting and so on.
The idea was not to prove the biological effects, but to examine the process of dilution.
Cancer and other treatments rely on 'bucket' chemistry.
Push loads of material in, hope the patient survives, repeat.
mRNA promises a more refined approach, but this is also in effect 'bucket chemistry' since the smart targeting just carries on without moderation - chaos ensues.
Why did dad do this? His day job was creating cylinders for printing, where the depth of material removed from the surface enabled print ink transfer to paper or film.
Literally, less is more.
It's high time Pharma moved away from bucket chemistry.
MMS folks. I'll say no more as I've just read the Cancer Act and if I said MMS (chlorine dioxide) cures cancer I'd be breaking the law so I'm obviously not going to say that MMS cures cancer.
Another way the TPTB drive cancer in us is the booze industry. I think prohibition was a psyop (like most of the history we are fed) to make us think we struck a blow for freedom by securing our right to drink posion. Oh how they must laugh we pay for our own demise.
I’m glad you have written about this Miri. There has been a lot of discussion about it this week in James D’s Telegram group where myself & others were wondering if this op is even more complex than you’ve just laid out? Everything about Kate & her sons smells off. The father is totally absent from
The internet and Paloma’s tragic character sounds like something from a Hollyweird script, a Roedean Scholar, Cambridge Graduate multi lingual, beauty queen killed by mad conspiracy loon mother. This 30 second video of Paloma and the youtube channel it is hosted on is odd too https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_rOl1m8m30
I agree there are more layers to this. Kate shemirani is highly suspicious to me. The whole story stinks to me Kate has an air of Sonia Poulton about her - paid government agent.
I worked in a hospice for a couple of years albeit 25 years ago. The patients who refused conventional treatment lasted years longer than those that had chemo and many patients wished they had never had chemo because it ruined their last months. You are right Miri that the majority of doctors would not have chemo themselves and nor do most take up the flu vaccine but the system forces them to push it all on their patients. There are some great natural products that help in many ways ie DMSO, Chlorine Dioxide solution, Methylene Blue, and cannabis for pain relief
Just been through the vile article published by Al-BBC, scribbled by Marianna Spring.
In the midst of a grieving family there's Sprong 'getting the info'.
The overall thrust is vicious, and retribution for daring to suggest the stuff Sping peddled was in any way inaccurate (that's the leap from cancer to Covid-19).
However.
Marianne Spoing has been caught out quite a lot. A nasty, nasty, chancer.
Right on the money as always Miri! It was in one of your articles that I first learnt about the Cancer Act and as I share with others, they are always shocked….Keep up the excellent work Miri! We love it! 😊
Oh Miri, your heart is aching. And you're writing straight out of your thoughts and probably with minimal editing, it's almost a carbon copy of those from the strong antivax mum's I know who've spent decades struggling to keep the flame burning. It's quite eerie - we see it plainly, it's not complex to describe, yet it's a mirage to most.
Re the 97% failure of chemo - that's the correct figure determined a couple of decades ago, I heard it as 3% effective and that this includes the 40% effectiveness of chemo on non-differentiated blood born cancers, so the working figure is that it's overall benefit is terribly negative.
So many people, women especially, still going for screenings year after year, for this and that. Of course, they almost always find something. I fired my doctor years ago after I realized that she only looked at her computer and every single thing I mentioned, she set me up with some specialist. I never went to one she suggested.
This man has interesting stories to tell about cancer after working for big pharma for many years. I am wondering if he is still alive after spilling these beans:
Thanks Miri for breaking this all down. It’s a topic well worth everyone getting to grips with.
On a practical note I have recently got a copy of “Cancer Care (2nd edition): The Role of Repurposed Drugs and Metabolic Interventions in Treating Cancer” by Paul E. Marik; the most published Critical Care Specialist in the USA.
I have been taken on quite a journey reading this book which has over 1300 references.
The book investigates the origins of cancer and looks at cancer prevention, metabolic and lifestyle interventions for cancer treatment and has a very detailed summary and evaluation of repurposed drugs to control cancer/reduce metastases, and a basic primer on chemotherapy and associated hazards and treatments to lower chemo toxicity when this course is followed….
In breast cancer treatment we give chemo to 3% of the patients, but the haematological cancer is treated by chemo primarily (and successfully) and recently by much more advanced bone marrow transplant.
Cancer charities have been shaking their collecting tins for as long as I can remember and have gathered millions upon millions in donations. Imperial Cancer Research was founded in 1902 and over 120 years later have still not got any nearer to a real cure.
Keeps a lot of people employed I suppose.
Radical Remission by Kelly Turner and Curing the Incurable by Dr Jerry Thompson are brilliant books on this topic. I'd also like to say that Cancer Research UK need to be reported to the ASA for saying in their advertising, "Together we're beating cancer". And while I'm on that topic, the BBC needs to be reported for advertising their TV licence with the strapline, "Nothing brings people together like TV."
Nothing that Cancer Research CEO Michelle Mitchell on £276000 per year can't fix. Hold on. PR! Where's the PR?
An excellent piece Miri!
My late father was an industrial chemist, and my mother was a pharmacist.
Both took chemistry rather seriously - it didn't rub off on me or my brother.
Dad had a life-long science based fascination with processed dilution steps. A mere mention of this around conventional biologists was enough to induce denunciation and a bit of carpet chewing.
Still, dad carried on for most of his adult life, reading, experimenting and so on.
The idea was not to prove the biological effects, but to examine the process of dilution.
Cancer and other treatments rely on 'bucket' chemistry.
Push loads of material in, hope the patient survives, repeat.
mRNA promises a more refined approach, but this is also in effect 'bucket chemistry' since the smart targeting just carries on without moderation - chaos ensues.
Why did dad do this? His day job was creating cylinders for printing, where the depth of material removed from the surface enabled print ink transfer to paper or film.
Literally, less is more.
It's high time Pharma moved away from bucket chemistry.
MMS folks. I'll say no more as I've just read the Cancer Act and if I said MMS (chlorine dioxide) cures cancer I'd be breaking the law so I'm obviously not going to say that MMS cures cancer.
Another way the TPTB drive cancer in us is the booze industry. I think prohibition was a psyop (like most of the history we are fed) to make us think we struck a blow for freedom by securing our right to drink posion. Oh how they must laugh we pay for our own demise.
I’m glad you have written about this Miri. There has been a lot of discussion about it this week in James D’s Telegram group where myself & others were wondering if this op is even more complex than you’ve just laid out? Everything about Kate & her sons smells off. The father is totally absent from
The internet and Paloma’s tragic character sounds like something from a Hollyweird script, a Roedean Scholar, Cambridge Graduate multi lingual, beauty queen killed by mad conspiracy loon mother. This 30 second video of Paloma and the youtube channel it is hosted on is odd too https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_rOl1m8m30
I agree there are more layers to this. Kate shemirani is highly suspicious to me. The whole story stinks to me Kate has an air of Sonia Poulton about her - paid government agent.
I worked in a hospice for a couple of years albeit 25 years ago. The patients who refused conventional treatment lasted years longer than those that had chemo and many patients wished they had never had chemo because it ruined their last months. You are right Miri that the majority of doctors would not have chemo themselves and nor do most take up the flu vaccine but the system forces them to push it all on their patients. There are some great natural products that help in many ways ie DMSO, Chlorine Dioxide solution, Methylene Blue, and cannabis for pain relief
Just been through the vile article published by Al-BBC, scribbled by Marianna Spring.
In the midst of a grieving family there's Sprong 'getting the info'.
The overall thrust is vicious, and retribution for daring to suggest the stuff Sping peddled was in any way inaccurate (that's the leap from cancer to Covid-19).
However.
Marianne Spoing has been caught out quite a lot. A nasty, nasty, chancer.
I hear 'Hope Not Hate' are hiring......
Right on the money as always Miri! It was in one of your articles that I first learnt about the Cancer Act and as I share with others, they are always shocked….Keep up the excellent work Miri! We love it! 😊
Oh Miri, your heart is aching. And you're writing straight out of your thoughts and probably with minimal editing, it's almost a carbon copy of those from the strong antivax mum's I know who've spent decades struggling to keep the flame burning. It's quite eerie - we see it plainly, it's not complex to describe, yet it's a mirage to most.
Re the 97% failure of chemo - that's the correct figure determined a couple of decades ago, I heard it as 3% effective and that this includes the 40% effectiveness of chemo on non-differentiated blood born cancers, so the working figure is that it's overall benefit is terribly negative.
Great article Miri.
So many people, women especially, still going for screenings year after year, for this and that. Of course, they almost always find something. I fired my doctor years ago after I realized that she only looked at her computer and every single thing I mentioned, she set me up with some specialist. I never went to one she suggested.
This man has interesting stories to tell about cancer after working for big pharma for many years. I am wondering if he is still alive after spilling these beans:
Ron Piana
Greed and the Pharmaceutical Industry 44 min.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foj4sfQP3ek
Ron Piana
Curing Cancer (affordably) 27 min.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikSlMlMFS7M
Thanks Miri for breaking this all down. It’s a topic well worth everyone getting to grips with.
On a practical note I have recently got a copy of “Cancer Care (2nd edition): The Role of Repurposed Drugs and Metabolic Interventions in Treating Cancer” by Paul E. Marik; the most published Critical Care Specialist in the USA.
I have been taken on quite a journey reading this book which has over 1300 references.
The book investigates the origins of cancer and looks at cancer prevention, metabolic and lifestyle interventions for cancer treatment and has a very detailed summary and evaluation of repurposed drugs to control cancer/reduce metastases, and a basic primer on chemotherapy and associated hazards and treatments to lower chemo toxicity when this course is followed….
The word "cancer" is too broad.
In breast cancer treatment we give chemo to 3% of the patients, but the haematological cancer is treated by chemo primarily (and successfully) and recently by much more advanced bone marrow transplant.
So "cancer" is not a uniform disease.