I wouldn't exactly say I have a surplus of skills in life, and indeed, lack many of the most basic aptitudes common to people just a couple of generations ago (such as being able to make clothes, grow food, and immediately discern the gender of young people on television).
Southport is showing signs of being a staged event IMHO. The main eyewitness, who apparently ‘looked the killer in the eye’, is giving a full account to Sky news the day after the ‘attack’, smiling all the way through, saying ‘I felt disgusted to be a part of this’ (hmmm … guilt at being a crisis actor?). Wouldn’t police prevent him talking in public until after investigation / trial ? And he gives an account of him working with Police and Paramedics, fetching IV fluids from the ambulance (he’s a window cleaner apparently). Bullshit.
Thanks to reading your articles and those of Ole Dammegard I am initially suspicious of any ‘event’ in the mainstream media.
It’s been surprising and disappointing how many seemingly critical thinkers have blindly believed the media on this, as you say a lot of it doesn’t add up so it’s wise to reserve judgement.
Such a great story about your ‘stolen’ car. Please pass on my commiserations to Mark at what must be a very difficult time 😄
Thank you, Mick, and I know your words will provide much needed strength and support ti Mark at this difficult time (to be fair, I suppose I could have added the detail that when one has never even driven, much less owned, a car, it is a bit easier to remain calm about the prospect of it being 'stolen'!).
I'm no longer plugged into the mainstream media for mind programming & indoctrination. All thanks to planes flying into towers flown by devout drunk Muslims with indestructible passports.
One of the many benefits of no longer consuming MSM output, being surveilled on CIA, NSA and military intelligence platforms like Lifelog, Goolag or Twitt, and avoiding NPCs and their bread and circuses distractions, is the ease with which one can live relatively happily, healthily, care free and with carefully calibrated default heuristics, several of which are covered in this brilliant article:
1. When it comes to anything appearing on any screen, don’t believe anything we hear and only half of what we see.
2. That which is promoted is obscuring somewhere while also causing damage elsewhere through omission and distraction.
3. False flags are real and for a long time have been a standard operating procedure.
4. Governments are captured terror cells within vast, ancient global psychopathic power structures that have long gamed this epoch to unleash totalitarian, genocidal, eugenicist plans.
5. We’re citizen infantry in an undeclared World War Three against a Fourth Reich deploying Fifth Generation Warfare. Act accordingly.
Dear Miri, excellent context, and as usual, thought provoking.
Part of the frustration is the stage management, with Police briefing journalists already about 'controlled release' of information. It would have been more honest to state the facts - skipping where the attacker was born - and left it at that. Almost nothing more than has already been officially released but on the day. Nothing to hide..
By letting media know there maybe more, it fuels the stories. It feeds distrust. It is chaotic.
Very interesting points. I did not see the full video from Manchester airport, but it seemed the police on site were rattled and not in full command. The alleged act was so shocking it's difficult to take a view - certainly it was evident the whole thing was so stark as to be some sort of set-up / hype.
Southport is becoming a PR mess, on top of tragedy.
The Police are sitting on evidence, so tensions rise.
In both cases I think the 'winner' is the state, letting the 'little people' run around doing this or that - the worse the 'better' - to show such people are stupid. It is gas lighting.
In both cases I think we are all correct to see what develops, to qualify our thoughts before any action - and share those thoughts carefully.
I don't think you're over-reaching at all. That was my opinion the moment I first saw the Manchester airport footage and expecting more race/civil tension incidents to follow.
Hard to be sure with info only derived from the lying-ass media, but more than enough reason to be skeptical imho.
I remember it well and knew some of the people involved/affected as well as experiencing similar throughout my 'eco-activism'.
It's been helpful working in developing countries, where police & governments much more openly behave as a criminal class demanding bribes or jailing/executing people. Yet are simultaneously The Law that people will still obey. To understand the identical societal control mechanisms of the West, which are a bit softer but still Huxwellian.
Despite my being incredulous about the staging of DJT's (now improbable) assassination attempt as demonstrated by Ole Dammagard on the Delingpod, I am being more cautious here! Certainly the media coverage is designed for the intended draconian agendas to be brought in. What a twisted world we are in.
“I don’t condone Kristallnacht, but we have to pay attention to the concerns of White Working Class Germans about globalisation and immigration””
And if that isn’t hint enough, try this:
"I feel the far right overplayed its hand this week. Boosted by GB News and Musk's toxic X, they kidded themselves that Britain has some sympathy with their racist smears. But hijacking the murder of children and attacking a grieving community - we won't put up with that.”
And who is Jukes? Nothing less than a co-founder of Byline Times, one of the initial sellers and most aggressive proponents of the new “Leftist” orientation of the post covid propagandist formation. In short, Jukes is a founder of the new Groovy Left, pitting itself against the “rising Nazism” which is the demonisation of the real opposition.
Expect a vast surge of contrived fascist sentiments which will be relentlessly associated with those refusing to go along with the covid/ climate/ trans guff and making ANY criticism at all about immigration.
Isn’t it remarkable how well this Southport matter played out for the construction of a “Far Right" riot narrative?
First, the perpetrator is under 18 which provides an excuse for the withholding of his name. This is accompanied by the customary reverse psychology meme: "This is not being treated as a terrorist attack".
Thus we have a perfect breeding ground for speculation from a “paranoid Rightist” angle.
Then the ever present reserve army of violent rioters turn up with accompanying racist chants designed to inflame “The Left”.
And note finally how this neatly fits in with the new “progressive” slant of the post covid propagandist paradigm.
Indeed, further inconsistencies in this testimony:
1) the excited shouting of children after a dance class and the terrified screams of children in the midst of a knife massacre would sound entirely different, yet this man discerns them solely on the basis of the length of time the shouting went on. Odd.
2) the girl he saw “appeared to have been stabbed”. Was she stabbed? Or appeared to have been? Odd use of language.
3) if he really did go head to head, unarmed, with a knife man he would be a hero (and likely also dead). If he is a crisis actor then he’s definitely not a hero. Perhaps why he maintains he’s not a hero?
4) nice use of crutches though, and good little bit of tearing up at the end …
Perhaps this is a clue to the whole thing?:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cydvr9d0vd3t
Half way down:
“What did Keir Starmer say? published at 16:47
We've just heard from Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who was speaking at a news conference this afternoon - if you missed it, here are the top lines:
A new "national capability" will be set up across police forces to combat violent disorder
Sharing intelligence, facial recognition technology and preventative measures to restrict people's movements will be part of the response
....
He told social media companies the law must be upheld everywhere over disorder "whipped up online"”
So to clarify:
• Police granted more powers.
• More surveillance.
• More restriction of people’s movements.
• Tightening up on social media platforms.
Southport is showing signs of being a staged event IMHO. The main eyewitness, who apparently ‘looked the killer in the eye’, is giving a full account to Sky news the day after the ‘attack’, smiling all the way through, saying ‘I felt disgusted to be a part of this’ (hmmm … guilt at being a crisis actor?). Wouldn’t police prevent him talking in public until after investigation / trial ? And he gives an account of him working with Police and Paramedics, fetching IV fluids from the ambulance (he’s a window cleaner apparently). Bullshit.
Thanks to reading your articles and those of Ole Dammegard I am initially suspicious of any ‘event’ in the mainstream media.
It’s been surprising and disappointing how many seemingly critical thinkers have blindly believed the media on this, as you say a lot of it doesn’t add up so it’s wise to reserve judgement.
Such a great story about your ‘stolen’ car. Please pass on my commiserations to Mark at what must be a very difficult time 😄
Thank you, Mick, and I know your words will provide much needed strength and support ti Mark at this difficult time (to be fair, I suppose I could have added the detail that when one has never even driven, much less owned, a car, it is a bit easier to remain calm about the prospect of it being 'stolen'!).
I'm no longer plugged into the mainstream media for mind programming & indoctrination. All thanks to planes flying into towers flown by devout drunk Muslims with indestructible passports.
Interesting. Especially since Keir Stalin has moved already to implement new powers to curb “rioting and unrest” 🤔
One of the many benefits of no longer consuming MSM output, being surveilled on CIA, NSA and military intelligence platforms like Lifelog, Goolag or Twitt, and avoiding NPCs and their bread and circuses distractions, is the ease with which one can live relatively happily, healthily, care free and with carefully calibrated default heuristics, several of which are covered in this brilliant article:
1. When it comes to anything appearing on any screen, don’t believe anything we hear and only half of what we see.
2. That which is promoted is obscuring somewhere while also causing damage elsewhere through omission and distraction.
3. False flags are real and for a long time have been a standard operating procedure.
4. Governments are captured terror cells within vast, ancient global psychopathic power structures that have long gamed this epoch to unleash totalitarian, genocidal, eugenicist plans.
5. We’re citizen infantry in an undeclared World War Three against a Fourth Reich deploying Fifth Generation Warfare. Act accordingly.
Dear Miri, excellent context, and as usual, thought provoking.
Part of the frustration is the stage management, with Police briefing journalists already about 'controlled release' of information. It would have been more honest to state the facts - skipping where the attacker was born - and left it at that. Almost nothing more than has already been officially released but on the day. Nothing to hide..
By letting media know there maybe more, it fuels the stories. It feeds distrust. It is chaotic.
Very interesting points. I did not see the full video from Manchester airport, but it seemed the police on site were rattled and not in full command. The alleged act was so shocking it's difficult to take a view - certainly it was evident the whole thing was so stark as to be some sort of set-up / hype.
Southport is becoming a PR mess, on top of tragedy.
The Police are sitting on evidence, so tensions rise.
In both cases I think the 'winner' is the state, letting the 'little people' run around doing this or that - the worse the 'better' - to show such people are stupid. It is gas lighting.
In both cases I think we are all correct to see what develops, to qualify our thoughts before any action - and share those thoughts carefully.
I don't think you're over-reaching at all. That was my opinion the moment I first saw the Manchester airport footage and expecting more race/civil tension incidents to follow.
Hard to be sure with info only derived from the lying-ass media, but more than enough reason to be skeptical imho.
I remember it well and knew some of the people involved/affected as well as experiencing similar throughout my 'eco-activism'.
It's been helpful working in developing countries, where police & governments much more openly behave as a criminal class demanding bribes or jailing/executing people. Yet are simultaneously The Law that people will still obey. To understand the identical societal control mechanisms of the West, which are a bit softer but still Huxwellian.
The kicking in the head episode is another George Floyd moment. Same thing....caught on camera, brutal, cops involved, and people taking sides.
Or the disaster with Sonya Massey...except the cop involved will be jailed for life.
Despite my being incredulous about the staging of DJT's (now improbable) assassination attempt as demonstrated by Ole Dammagard on the Delingpod, I am being more cautious here! Certainly the media coverage is designed for the intended draconian agendas to be brought in. What a twisted world we are in.
Bravo Miri! Look up as well as side to side. You have ice flowing through your veins and are a true Top Gun of the freedom fraternity
Just found this tweet from one Peter Jukes:
“1930s version of GBNews/Goodwin etc..
“I don’t condone Kristallnacht, but we have to pay attention to the concerns of White Working Class Germans about globalisation and immigration””
And if that isn’t hint enough, try this:
"I feel the far right overplayed its hand this week. Boosted by GB News and Musk's toxic X, they kidded themselves that Britain has some sympathy with their racist smears. But hijacking the murder of children and attacking a grieving community - we won't put up with that.”
And who is Jukes? Nothing less than a co-founder of Byline Times, one of the initial sellers and most aggressive proponents of the new “Leftist” orientation of the post covid propagandist formation. In short, Jukes is a founder of the new Groovy Left, pitting itself against the “rising Nazism” which is the demonisation of the real opposition.
Expect a vast surge of contrived fascist sentiments which will be relentlessly associated with those refusing to go along with the covid/ climate/ trans guff and making ANY criticism at all about immigration.
Isn’t it remarkable how well this Southport matter played out for the construction of a “Far Right" riot narrative?
First, the perpetrator is under 18 which provides an excuse for the withholding of his name. This is accompanied by the customary reverse psychology meme: "This is not being treated as a terrorist attack".
Thus we have a perfect breeding ground for speculation from a “paranoid Rightist” angle.
Then the ever present reserve army of violent rioters turn up with accompanying racist chants designed to inflame “The Left”.
And note finally how this neatly fits in with the new “progressive” slant of the post covid propagandist paradigm.
What’s your take on the Dunblane affair from several decades back?
I went there after lockdowns and interviewed the village, police and hospital in Sterling.
I left pretty convinced the whole thing was a lie.
Interesting.. I'd be interested in some deep dive on the matter.
https://mileswmathis.com/dunblane.pdf covers some of the obvious questions about it and this 3 min video of a victim (who has definitely not just been shot through the head) is what got me started looking into it is a good place to start https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcC89typpao
Also there is a very long royal report that makes no sense.
Thank you.
Indeed, further inconsistencies in this testimony:
1) the excited shouting of children after a dance class and the terrified screams of children in the midst of a knife massacre would sound entirely different, yet this man discerns them solely on the basis of the length of time the shouting went on. Odd.
2) the girl he saw “appeared to have been stabbed”. Was she stabbed? Or appeared to have been? Odd use of language.
3) if he really did go head to head, unarmed, with a knife man he would be a hero (and likely also dead). If he is a crisis actor then he’s definitely not a hero. Perhaps why he maintains he’s not a hero?
4) nice use of crutches though, and good little bit of tearing up at the end …