I wouldn't exactly say I have a surplus of skills in life, and indeed, lack many of the most basic aptitudes common to people just a couple of generations ago (such as being able to make clothes, grow food, and immediately discern the gender of young people on television).
The first red-flag around this event for me was the following day, when the 'families' issued statements on Tuesday the 30th of July. One of the statements said:
"Keep smiling and dancing like you love to do our Princess, like we said before to you, you're always our princess and no one would change that. Love from Your Hero Daddy and Mummy." - Parents of Alice.
This seems like a peculiar statement within less than 24 hours after the event. Are these the words of people whose child has just been butchered? They appear a little relaxed. I would expect such words to be expressed maybe 2-3 weeks after the emotions around the murder have died down, but not within 24 hours. Also note the use of the word 'Hero' which the regime loves to use.
This little statement made me think twice. But what would I know?
Interesting. See my comment to Andrew Marsh's reply above. There have been several 'events' over the past two-three weeks (just after Labour enter office) - the attack on the solider in London, Leeds, Manchester Airport and this week Southport.
All seem very well timed to nudge the public into accepting the components of a new 'national capability'. It also all fits in very well with Agenda 2030 (restrictions on movement and more digital/tech surveillance).
Just like the scamdemic, it looks like the public are being played again.
Southport is showing signs of being a staged event IMHO. The main eyewitness, who apparently ‘looked the killer in the eye’, is giving a full account to Sky news the day after the ‘attack’, smiling all the way through, saying ‘I felt disgusted to be a part of this’ (hmmm … guilt at being a crisis actor?). Wouldn’t police prevent him talking in public until after investigation / trial ? And he gives an account of him working with Police and Paramedics, fetching IV fluids from the ambulance (he’s a window cleaner apparently). Bullshit.
Thanks to reading your articles and those of Ole Dammegard I am initially suspicious of any ‘event’ in the mainstream media.
It’s been surprising and disappointing how many seemingly critical thinkers have blindly believed the media on this, as you say a lot of it doesn’t add up so it’s wise to reserve judgement.
Such a great story about your ‘stolen’ car. Please pass on my commiserations to Mark at what must be a very difficult time 😄
Thank you, Mick, and I know your words will provide much needed strength and support ti Mark at this difficult time (to be fair, I suppose I could have added the detail that when one has never even driven, much less owned, a car, it is a bit easier to remain calm about the prospect of it being 'stolen'!).
I'm no longer plugged into the mainstream media for mind programming & indoctrination. All thanks to planes flying into towers flown by devout drunk Muslims with indestructible passports.
One of the many benefits of no longer consuming MSM output, being surveilled on CIA, NSA and military intelligence platforms like Lifelog, Goolag or Twitt, and avoiding NPCs and their bread and circuses distractions, is the ease with which one can live relatively happily, healthily, care free and with carefully calibrated default heuristics, several of which are covered in this brilliant article:
1. When it comes to anything appearing on any screen, don’t believe anything we hear and only half of what we see.
2. That which is promoted is obscuring somewhere while also causing damage elsewhere through omission and distraction.
3. False flags are real and for a long time have been a standard operating procedure.
4. Governments are captured terror cells within vast, ancient global psychopathic power structures that have long gamed this epoch to unleash totalitarian, genocidal, eugenicist plans.
5. We’re citizen infantry in an undeclared World War Three against a Fourth Reich deploying Fifth Generation Warfare. Act accordingly.
Dear Miri, excellent context, and as usual, thought provoking.
Part of the frustration is the stage management, with Police briefing journalists already about 'controlled release' of information. It would have been more honest to state the facts - skipping where the attacker was born - and left it at that. Almost nothing more than has already been officially released but on the day. Nothing to hide..
By letting media know there maybe more, it fuels the stories. It feeds distrust. It is chaotic.
Andrew, what did you think about that Manchester airport video released last week (where the armed officer gave the pakistani muslim 'gentleman' a good kicking in the head?)
I assume that we both may agree that the British regime and the media actually work hand in glove to build narratives and 'nudge' the public? So, what was interesting for me, was the main stream media releasing that 'clipped' footage knowing that it would create outrage, and then on many social media sites you could see people defending 'our' British police and their actions in this (staged?) scenario. I was a bit concerned that people were being nudged into accepting more brutality from the British police (for our safety and protection, of course).
If public opinion is nudged further into this position, such sanctioned brutality will only be used more so against the native population (we all should remember how the police behaved around the world in 2020/21/22). The police work for the state. They are not on our side. They are not our 'friends'.
Those pakistani's were either actors, or just useful idiots. Anyhow, the regime gets these fools to act out and commit such attacks, the public then defend the police behaviour and demand more police powers in order to 'protect' us. In my opinion, the Manchester Airport scenario last week was classic Problem > Reaction > Solution.
Any thoughts? Am I over-reaching here? In both of these scenarios (Manchester Airport, Southport), should we be asking again 'who benefits'?
Very interesting points. I did not see the full video from Manchester airport, but it seemed the police on site were rattled and not in full command. The alleged act was so shocking it's difficult to take a view - certainly it was evident the whole thing was so stark as to be some sort of set-up / hype.
Southport is becoming a PR mess, on top of tragedy.
The Police are sitting on evidence, so tensions rise.
In both cases I think the 'winner' is the state, letting the 'little people' run around doing this or that - the worse the 'better' - to show such people are stupid. It is gas lighting.
In both cases I think we are all correct to see what develops, to qualify our thoughts before any action - and share those thoughts carefully.
I don't think you're over-reaching at all. That was my opinion the moment I first saw the Manchester airport footage and expecting more race/civil tension incidents to follow.
Hard to be sure with info only derived from the lying-ass media, but more than enough reason to be skeptical imho.
Leo, I always cast my mind back to the story of how state agents (undercover police) went so far that in order to spy on a group of 'eco-activists' they even had children with several of the women. That's how far these people within these agencies will go.
It's as if as soon as someone puts on a uniform provided by the state, they see their own people as enemies - and will go to any lengths by any means necessary. It's a strange psychology - and we should always be resisting giving such people more power.
I remember it well and knew some of the people involved/affected as well as experiencing similar throughout my 'eco-activism'.
It's been helpful working in developing countries, where police & governments much more openly behave as a criminal class demanding bribes or jailing/executing people. Yet are simultaneously The Law that people will still obey. To understand the identical societal control mechanisms of the West, which are a bit softer but still Huxwellian.
Yes, I think that was the intention by the mainstream media to incite trouble by releasing that clipped Manchester airport video. But we should all be cynical enough by now to know that they would've got blessing from the (deep) state to go ahead with the plan.
However, it looks like both the Manchester airport scenario and the Sonya Massey scenario has not worked.
It also looks like the Illinois State Police also 'timed' the release of the Massey video in an expedient manner to maybe impact upon election sentiment in the USA.
Here's an interesting article from those 'white nationalists' at Counter Currents on this scenario. The article along with the comments are both very balanced and interesting.
The tell-sign after the Manchester airport scenario were all the comments online baying that the police officer had been justified, that it's OK for them to behave in such a manner and that they need more protection powers to 'protect us'. I know the police take an oath (to the King) to swear to serve the public (LOL!), but the public need to ensure that police powers are not used against ordinary people going about their lawful business across this land. It's a fine line and there are 'bad cops'. Some of the comments in the Counter Currents article above talk about how slovenly (tattoos, scruffy uniforms, hipster beards) the police have been encouraged to become over the past twenty years - especially in the UK - and how it appears to attract people who do not have the public's interest at heart, but are more interested in the power (plus the bringing-in of foreigners to police over us - which in my opinion should be ceased).
The UK security industry is the same too. I went into a Co-Op recently. It's a tiny store. There were THREE asian security guards in there dressed up like paramilitaries. One had his face covered - all to protect the bananas and the toilet rolls I presume? This is deliberate, it is menacing and it has to STOP. After a few years, some of those imported security guards can apply for a position in the police 'service' and will be policing us. God help us.
Despite my being incredulous about the staging of DJT's (now improbable) assassination attempt as demonstrated by Ole Dammagard on the Delingpod, I am being more cautious here! Certainly the media coverage is designed for the intended draconian agendas to be brought in. What a twisted world we are in.
I don't agree with everything Nigel Watson states in his recent video on Southport. However, he is correct how suddenly everyone gets sucked back into the whirlwind created by the mainstream media, knowing full well how much they lied to the public in 2020/21/22. Why are people still allowing the MSM to jerk them around emotionally on a leash?
Southport & Southend - What's Going On? The Stakes Couldn't Be Any Higher!
“I don’t condone Kristallnacht, but we have to pay attention to the concerns of White Working Class Germans about globalisation and immigration””
And if that isn’t hint enough, try this:
"I feel the far right overplayed its hand this week. Boosted by GB News and Musk's toxic X, they kidded themselves that Britain has some sympathy with their racist smears. But hijacking the murder of children and attacking a grieving community - we won't put up with that.”
And who is Jukes? Nothing less than a co-founder of Byline Times, one of the initial sellers and most aggressive proponents of the new “Leftist” orientation of the post covid propagandist formation. In short, Jukes is a founder of the new Groovy Left, pitting itself against the “rising Nazism” which is the demonisation of the real opposition.
Expect a vast surge of contrived fascist sentiments which will be relentlessly associated with those refusing to go along with the covid/ climate/ trans guff and making ANY criticism at all about immigration.
Isn’t it remarkable how well this Southport matter played out for the construction of a “Far Right" riot narrative?
First, the perpetrator is under 18 which provides an excuse for the withholding of his name. This is accompanied by the customary reverse psychology meme: "This is not being treated as a terrorist attack".
Thus we have a perfect breeding ground for speculation from a “paranoid Rightist” angle.
Then the ever present reserve army of violent rioters turn up with accompanying racist chants designed to inflame “The Left”.
And note finally how this neatly fits in with the new “progressive” slant of the post covid propagandist paradigm.
Apologies for linking to a MSM video. I've just watched the interview with the 'businessman' (who saw a 'guy' coming at him with a knife and was apparently stabbed in the leg).
Is it me, or is the businessman smirking all throughout whilst giving his narrative?! There's also that regime (code?) word of 'hero' again, and he uses phrases like 'horrorSHOW' and 'it was surreal'.
'I'm not the hero': Man who confronted Southport attacker speaks of ordeal | ITV News
Indeed, further inconsistencies in this testimony:
1) the excited shouting of children after a dance class and the terrified screams of children in the midst of a knife massacre would sound entirely different, yet this man discerns them solely on the basis of the length of time the shouting went on. Odd.
2) the girl he saw “appeared to have been stabbed”. Was she stabbed? Or appeared to have been? Odd use of language.
3) if he really did go head to head, unarmed, with a knife man he would be a hero (and likely also dead). If he is a crisis actor then he’s definitely not a hero. Perhaps why he maintains he’s not a hero?
4) nice use of crutches though, and good little bit of tearing up at the end …
Yes, I noticed the placing of the crutches in the shot! I surprised that they didn't place a teddy-bear on the sofa with him too.
Well-spotted about the odd length of time the shouting went on - very odd. His language throughout is not that of someone who has been in such a terrible incident, and his constant smirking throughout (very overdone duper's delight!). He also said that he raised his arm up (as a reaction to being possibly threatened by a knife) but didn't notice that he'd been stabbed in the leg. OK.
It's all an ongoing game isn't it? And the Dr. Who element! There is some serious occult-level signalling and burlesquing go on here!
The first red-flag around this event for me was the following day, when the 'families' issued statements on Tuesday the 30th of July. One of the statements said:
"Keep smiling and dancing like you love to do our Princess, like we said before to you, you're always our princess and no one would change that. Love from Your Hero Daddy and Mummy." - Parents of Alice.
This seems like a peculiar statement within less than 24 hours after the event. Are these the words of people whose child has just been butchered? They appear a little relaxed. I would expect such words to be expressed maybe 2-3 weeks after the emotions around the murder have died down, but not within 24 hours. Also note the use of the word 'Hero' which the regime loves to use.
This little statement made me think twice. But what would I know?
Perhaps this is a clue to the whole thing?:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cydvr9d0vd3t
Half way down:
“What did Keir Starmer say? published at 16:47
We've just heard from Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who was speaking at a news conference this afternoon - if you missed it, here are the top lines:
A new "national capability" will be set up across police forces to combat violent disorder
Sharing intelligence, facial recognition technology and preventative measures to restrict people's movements will be part of the response
....
He told social media companies the law must be upheld everywhere over disorder "whipped up online"”
So to clarify:
• Police granted more powers.
• More surveillance.
• More restriction of people’s movements.
• Tightening up on social media platforms.
Interesting. See my comment to Andrew Marsh's reply above. There have been several 'events' over the past two-three weeks (just after Labour enter office) - the attack on the solider in London, Leeds, Manchester Airport and this week Southport.
All seem very well timed to nudge the public into accepting the components of a new 'national capability'. It also all fits in very well with Agenda 2030 (restrictions on movement and more digital/tech surveillance).
Just like the scamdemic, it looks like the public are being played again.
Southport is showing signs of being a staged event IMHO. The main eyewitness, who apparently ‘looked the killer in the eye’, is giving a full account to Sky news the day after the ‘attack’, smiling all the way through, saying ‘I felt disgusted to be a part of this’ (hmmm … guilt at being a crisis actor?). Wouldn’t police prevent him talking in public until after investigation / trial ? And he gives an account of him working with Police and Paramedics, fetching IV fluids from the ambulance (he’s a window cleaner apparently). Bullshit.
"looked him in the eye" yet had no idea about his race. It's because we're 'all the same' you see.
Thanks to reading your articles and those of Ole Dammegard I am initially suspicious of any ‘event’ in the mainstream media.
It’s been surprising and disappointing how many seemingly critical thinkers have blindly believed the media on this, as you say a lot of it doesn’t add up so it’s wise to reserve judgement.
Such a great story about your ‘stolen’ car. Please pass on my commiserations to Mark at what must be a very difficult time 😄
Thank you, Mick, and I know your words will provide much needed strength and support ti Mark at this difficult time (to be fair, I suppose I could have added the detail that when one has never even driven, much less owned, a car, it is a bit easier to remain calm about the prospect of it being 'stolen'!).
I'm no longer plugged into the mainstream media for mind programming & indoctrination. All thanks to planes flying into towers flown by devout drunk Muslims with indestructible passports.
So where was the plane?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBPQwrG0nCM&list=PL1Qz0ACnx6tHcjDJ2dwsAhaFclYgpeOLa&t=5702s
Interesting. Especially since Keir Stalin has moved already to implement new powers to curb “rioting and unrest” 🤔
One of the many benefits of no longer consuming MSM output, being surveilled on CIA, NSA and military intelligence platforms like Lifelog, Goolag or Twitt, and avoiding NPCs and their bread and circuses distractions, is the ease with which one can live relatively happily, healthily, care free and with carefully calibrated default heuristics, several of which are covered in this brilliant article:
1. When it comes to anything appearing on any screen, don’t believe anything we hear and only half of what we see.
2. That which is promoted is obscuring somewhere while also causing damage elsewhere through omission and distraction.
3. False flags are real and for a long time have been a standard operating procedure.
4. Governments are captured terror cells within vast, ancient global psychopathic power structures that have long gamed this epoch to unleash totalitarian, genocidal, eugenicist plans.
5. We’re citizen infantry in an undeclared World War Three against a Fourth Reich deploying Fifth Generation Warfare. Act accordingly.
Dear Miri, excellent context, and as usual, thought provoking.
Part of the frustration is the stage management, with Police briefing journalists already about 'controlled release' of information. It would have been more honest to state the facts - skipping where the attacker was born - and left it at that. Almost nothing more than has already been officially released but on the day. Nothing to hide..
By letting media know there maybe more, it fuels the stories. It feeds distrust. It is chaotic.
Andrew, what did you think about that Manchester airport video released last week (where the armed officer gave the pakistani muslim 'gentleman' a good kicking in the head?)
I assume that we both may agree that the British regime and the media actually work hand in glove to build narratives and 'nudge' the public? So, what was interesting for me, was the main stream media releasing that 'clipped' footage knowing that it would create outrage, and then on many social media sites you could see people defending 'our' British police and their actions in this (staged?) scenario. I was a bit concerned that people were being nudged into accepting more brutality from the British police (for our safety and protection, of course).
If public opinion is nudged further into this position, such sanctioned brutality will only be used more so against the native population (we all should remember how the police behaved around the world in 2020/21/22). The police work for the state. They are not on our side. They are not our 'friends'.
Those pakistani's were either actors, or just useful idiots. Anyhow, the regime gets these fools to act out and commit such attacks, the public then defend the police behaviour and demand more police powers in order to 'protect' us. In my opinion, the Manchester Airport scenario last week was classic Problem > Reaction > Solution.
Any thoughts? Am I over-reaching here? In both of these scenarios (Manchester Airport, Southport), should we be asking again 'who benefits'?
Very interesting points. I did not see the full video from Manchester airport, but it seemed the police on site were rattled and not in full command. The alleged act was so shocking it's difficult to take a view - certainly it was evident the whole thing was so stark as to be some sort of set-up / hype.
Southport is becoming a PR mess, on top of tragedy.
The Police are sitting on evidence, so tensions rise.
In both cases I think the 'winner' is the state, letting the 'little people' run around doing this or that - the worse the 'better' - to show such people are stupid. It is gas lighting.
In both cases I think we are all correct to see what develops, to qualify our thoughts before any action - and share those thoughts carefully.
I don't think you're over-reaching at all. That was my opinion the moment I first saw the Manchester airport footage and expecting more race/civil tension incidents to follow.
Hard to be sure with info only derived from the lying-ass media, but more than enough reason to be skeptical imho.
Leo, I always cast my mind back to the story of how state agents (undercover police) went so far that in order to spy on a group of 'eco-activists' they even had children with several of the women. That's how far these people within these agencies will go.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/jan/20/undercover-police-children-activists
It's as if as soon as someone puts on a uniform provided by the state, they see their own people as enemies - and will go to any lengths by any means necessary. It's a strange psychology - and we should always be resisting giving such people more power.
I remember it well and knew some of the people involved/affected as well as experiencing similar throughout my 'eco-activism'.
It's been helpful working in developing countries, where police & governments much more openly behave as a criminal class demanding bribes or jailing/executing people. Yet are simultaneously The Law that people will still obey. To understand the identical societal control mechanisms of the West, which are a bit softer but still Huxwellian.
The kicking in the head episode is another George Floyd moment. Same thing....caught on camera, brutal, cops involved, and people taking sides.
Or the disaster with Sonya Massey...except the cop involved will be jailed for life.
Yes, I think that was the intention by the mainstream media to incite trouble by releasing that clipped Manchester airport video. But we should all be cynical enough by now to know that they would've got blessing from the (deep) state to go ahead with the plan.
However, it looks like both the Manchester airport scenario and the Sonya Massey scenario has not worked.
It also looks like the Illinois State Police also 'timed' the release of the Massey video in an expedient manner to maybe impact upon election sentiment in the USA.
Here's an interesting article from those 'white nationalists' at Counter Currents on this scenario. The article along with the comments are both very balanced and interesting.
https://counter-currents.com/2024/07/sonya-massey-is-this-election-cycles-george-floyd/
The tell-sign after the Manchester airport scenario were all the comments online baying that the police officer had been justified, that it's OK for them to behave in such a manner and that they need more protection powers to 'protect us'. I know the police take an oath (to the King) to swear to serve the public (LOL!), but the public need to ensure that police powers are not used against ordinary people going about their lawful business across this land. It's a fine line and there are 'bad cops'. Some of the comments in the Counter Currents article above talk about how slovenly (tattoos, scruffy uniforms, hipster beards) the police have been encouraged to become over the past twenty years - especially in the UK - and how it appears to attract people who do not have the public's interest at heart, but are more interested in the power (plus the bringing-in of foreigners to police over us - which in my opinion should be ceased).
The UK security industry is the same too. I went into a Co-Op recently. It's a tiny store. There were THREE asian security guards in there dressed up like paramilitaries. One had his face covered - all to protect the bananas and the toilet rolls I presume? This is deliberate, it is menacing and it has to STOP. After a few years, some of those imported security guards can apply for a position in the police 'service' and will be policing us. God help us.
Despite my being incredulous about the staging of DJT's (now improbable) assassination attempt as demonstrated by Ole Dammagard on the Delingpod, I am being more cautious here! Certainly the media coverage is designed for the intended draconian agendas to be brought in. What a twisted world we are in.
I don't agree with everything Nigel Watson states in his recent video on Southport. However, he is correct how suddenly everyone gets sucked back into the whirlwind created by the mainstream media, knowing full well how much they lied to the public in 2020/21/22. Why are people still allowing the MSM to jerk them around emotionally on a leash?
Southport & Southend - What's Going On? The Stakes Couldn't Be Any Higher!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uI6mId61G4k
Bravo Miri! Look up as well as side to side. You have ice flowing through your veins and are a true Top Gun of the freedom fraternity
Just found this tweet from one Peter Jukes:
“1930s version of GBNews/Goodwin etc..
“I don’t condone Kristallnacht, but we have to pay attention to the concerns of White Working Class Germans about globalisation and immigration””
And if that isn’t hint enough, try this:
"I feel the far right overplayed its hand this week. Boosted by GB News and Musk's toxic X, they kidded themselves that Britain has some sympathy with their racist smears. But hijacking the murder of children and attacking a grieving community - we won't put up with that.”
And who is Jukes? Nothing less than a co-founder of Byline Times, one of the initial sellers and most aggressive proponents of the new “Leftist” orientation of the post covid propagandist formation. In short, Jukes is a founder of the new Groovy Left, pitting itself against the “rising Nazism” which is the demonisation of the real opposition.
Expect a vast surge of contrived fascist sentiments which will be relentlessly associated with those refusing to go along with the covid/ climate/ trans guff and making ANY criticism at all about immigration.
Isn’t it remarkable how well this Southport matter played out for the construction of a “Far Right" riot narrative?
First, the perpetrator is under 18 which provides an excuse for the withholding of his name. This is accompanied by the customary reverse psychology meme: "This is not being treated as a terrorist attack".
Thus we have a perfect breeding ground for speculation from a “paranoid Rightist” angle.
Then the ever present reserve army of violent rioters turn up with accompanying racist chants designed to inflame “The Left”.
And note finally how this neatly fits in with the new “progressive” slant of the post covid propagandist paradigm.
What’s your take on the Dunblane affair from several decades back?
I went there after lockdowns and interviewed the village, police and hospital in Sterling.
I left pretty convinced the whole thing was a lie.
Interesting.. I'd be interested in some deep dive on the matter.
https://mileswmathis.com/dunblane.pdf covers some of the obvious questions about it and this 3 min video of a victim (who has definitely not just been shot through the head) is what got me started looking into it is a good place to start https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcC89typpao
Also there is a very long royal report that makes no sense.
Thank you.
Apologies for linking to a MSM video. I've just watched the interview with the 'businessman' (who saw a 'guy' coming at him with a knife and was apparently stabbed in the leg).
Is it me, or is the businessman smirking all throughout whilst giving his narrative?! There's also that regime (code?) word of 'hero' again, and he uses phrases like 'horrorSHOW' and 'it was surreal'.
'I'm not the hero': Man who confronted Southport attacker speaks of ordeal | ITV News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VMD4ypAN3c
Turns out the bulb-headed rwandan was also a BBC actor too, once appearing in a Dr. Who skit for the BBC. Yet again, another actor in the mix.
It will be interesting too see if this 'businessman' also has any previous in the acting profession?
Indeed, further inconsistencies in this testimony:
1) the excited shouting of children after a dance class and the terrified screams of children in the midst of a knife massacre would sound entirely different, yet this man discerns them solely on the basis of the length of time the shouting went on. Odd.
2) the girl he saw “appeared to have been stabbed”. Was she stabbed? Or appeared to have been? Odd use of language.
3) if he really did go head to head, unarmed, with a knife man he would be a hero (and likely also dead). If he is a crisis actor then he’s definitely not a hero. Perhaps why he maintains he’s not a hero?
4) nice use of crutches though, and good little bit of tearing up at the end …
Yes, I noticed the placing of the crutches in the shot! I surprised that they didn't place a teddy-bear on the sofa with him too.
Well-spotted about the odd length of time the shouting went on - very odd. His language throughout is not that of someone who has been in such a terrible incident, and his constant smirking throughout (very overdone duper's delight!). He also said that he raised his arm up (as a reaction to being possibly threatened by a knife) but didn't notice that he'd been stabbed in the leg. OK.
It's all an ongoing game isn't it? And the Dr. Who element! There is some serious occult-level signalling and burlesquing go on here!