We know it's the case that "if you know their name, they're in the game", meaning that if the establishment media machine gives a great deal of coverage to an individual, whether positive or negative, it's because that individual is somehow involved in pushing the establishment agenda, and therefore the establishment wants you to know about them (hence the phrase, "there's no such thing as bad publicity".
There’s another issue at play here that is not getting enough attention. Population decline. The female fertility rate across the entire industrialized world is well below the replacement rate of about 2.11. We’re not making enough babies to survive as a species.
It’s more than about sex. It’s about how do we promote stable relationships capable producing and properly raising enough babies.
This is a sad sad story. Quite honestly, a world in which there is such abuse, such dysfunctionality, is a world in which people have departed from God and his ways. I am afraid we are reaping the reward for leaving God out of the equation, out of our lives, and thinking that we can manage just fine without him. Well, we can’t and that’s that!
I believe we can trace this back to the aftermath of WW2 when women weren't just going to revert to being homemakers but wanted freedom to pursue careers.This progressed through the sixties and the planned demoralisation of society with the contraceptive pill and the sexual revolution spoken of by Dr John Coleman. By God's grace we survived two world wars as a nation but as we turn our backs on Him now, we see the folly of this in the judgements manifested, particularly the breakdown of the family unit which is the foundation of all nations.
Thanks Alan. You might enjoy this article I wrote on the roots of the sexual revolution (and how the original women's movement was hijacked by social engineers - the original women's rights activists were against hormonal contraception and abortion) https://miriaf.co.uk/did-the-sexual-revolution-happen-by-accident/
Yes, thank you for this with the usual suspects of course. Later in the sixties there was also the 1967 Abortion Act to add into the mix and currently it seems only a matter of time before euthanasia is 'legalised' to bring us full circle, so to speak, from cradle to grave.
You can off yourself where I live. Call in the MAID to clean up the mess. Thousands of people so far and I sure don't believe the numbers they're publishing. Most likely many more.
Miri, You are ahead of the game as usual. I wonder how long before the crackdown. G H Pember who wrote Earth's Earliest Ages about a century ago predicted the demise of men in society. I hope your eyesight does not become a serious problem and that you have prepared for the worst. I think few will realise what is in prospect in answer to your question, as you imply.
Thank you, John, and I will check out G H Pember. My eyesight should be okay, thanks - it's an inherited problem that did blind my grandfather and great-grandmother, but the main danger period is childhood whilst one is still growing. I did nearly lose my sight aged 9 via detached retinas, but fortunately, fast acting surgeons were able to save it and so while I'll always have rather subpar eyesight, I'm unlikely to lose it altogether. My mother, who is 22 years older than me with the same condition, has not, so, as always, I live in hope!
My mother had macular degeneration and became registered blind but did retain some (difficult to know how much) peripheral vision. Glad you are on top of things. I am unaffected . Pember became a Christian at university studying classics. The book started as an investigation into spiritism but became much broader. He was way before his time and regrettably is not mainstream, despite belonging to the Brethren, open rather than exclusive I believe. I have to catch up on your previous posts as I am a recent subscriber. One post invariably leads to one or more others.
Hi again Miri, I have searched my copy of EEA but cannot find the passages that I am sure are there. It's a big read so please don't waste your valuable time on it. It was many years ago that I first read it and I regard it as foundational to end time prophecy. Others don't share that view!
Netflix series or a film is no doubts on the way. The amount of tools to manipulate peoples mind and level of efficiency of them is staggering now. The changes that took decades in making 50-70 years ago, now would take a few years.
Just one quote from the New York Post: oh, only ten men, that’s a drop in the bucket nowadays”.
It’s fun trawling through the comments, in: Daily Mail, reviews on Amazon, Waterstones, The Times, etc. .. such a dizzy array of erraticism and unpredictability: hell is other people, I guess. And very much like one of the links you supplied: the case against, ‘Louise Perry’ (fabulous, btw) a definite case of controlled Opp/intel asset ( and I remember ploughing through three Germaine Greer books before thinking: hang on a minute, mate, your having a laugh?) so, very much in agreement with the general sentiment.
And to be honest, it wouldn’t really matter who wrote ‘Ruskins’ book/novel/diary of a modern day feminist, or whatever. Because it’s the lies and deceit of the powers that shouldn’t be, which must prevail: there was a point where I even considered that the ‘Confessions of Kitty’ may even have been knocked up by ChatGPT.?
You really have to wonder what her next ‘project’ might be. .. I’m sure the production team are eagerly pulling ideas together round the drawing board, as we ponder our next expensive trip to the supermarket. Hopefully negotiating it successfully - without being drugged and thrown in the back of a taxi. As you can guess I haven’t actually read the book, and have no intention of doing so. I’ll wait for the Netflix offering. Or ‘kitty’s next construct’ …
As discussed in earlier pieces; the whole point is to design and fabricate narratives, with the intention to wind up as many citizens as possible. Keep it divisive: men against women; woke / anti woke, right against left.etc, etc. But there really is something so exquisitely poetic (in a very dark sense, obviously) about the sexism angle, that really resonates with lots of punters. And therefore must constantly be exploited by our overlords. Too good to waste this one. Still huge mileage to be had out of it… Now then, where was I … oh yes.. the dating app. Gotta make up for lost time.. hmm !!?
Thanks Dean, and yes, I did consider whether the book was fabricated / fictional (as many "memoirs" are, mentioning no names, "Dr. Oxford"...), but having read it, I am sure that it is not. It has the unmistakeable ring of human-written authenticity (I strongly suspect much of it was lifted from a diary, and/or confessional letters to friends).
I think Louise Perry and Kitty Ruskin are both being used to fulfil an agenda, but I think the difference is, Louise Perry is fully aware of this and complicit (she is after all a foundational member of ARC), whereas Ruskin is simply a "useful idiot", who has written a genuine account of her life which the overlords have realised they can use and weaponise.
It will be very interesting and revealing to see if Louise Perry comments on Ruskin's book.
I reckon the supreme example of pseudo-intellectual sexual numbness indoctrination is Seinfeld where, under a posturing air of Beckettian existential angst or whatever, we get four mercilessly shallow, callous and utterly selfish individuals grinding through an interminable series of meaningless sexual encounters that never seem to teach them anything whatsoever. This is another example of how a stultifying personal crippling can be induced through an appeal to the viewer's vanity by presenting a “cerebral” front.
There’s another issue at play here that is not getting enough attention. Population decline. The female fertility rate across the entire industrialized world is well below the replacement rate of about 2.11. We’re not making enough babies to survive as a species.
It’s more than about sex. It’s about how do we promote stable relationships capable producing and properly raising enough babies.
The sexual revolution was always meant to entirely detach sex from procreation, which it has very successfully done. I wrote more about that here: https://miriaf.co.uk/did-the-sexual-revolution-happen-by-accident/
Thank you, Miri. An excellent read.
This is a sad sad story. Quite honestly, a world in which there is such abuse, such dysfunctionality, is a world in which people have departed from God and his ways. I am afraid we are reaping the reward for leaving God out of the equation, out of our lives, and thinking that we can manage just fine without him. Well, we can’t and that’s that!
I believe we can trace this back to the aftermath of WW2 when women weren't just going to revert to being homemakers but wanted freedom to pursue careers.This progressed through the sixties and the planned demoralisation of society with the contraceptive pill and the sexual revolution spoken of by Dr John Coleman. By God's grace we survived two world wars as a nation but as we turn our backs on Him now, we see the folly of this in the judgements manifested, particularly the breakdown of the family unit which is the foundation of all nations.
Thanks Alan. You might enjoy this article I wrote on the roots of the sexual revolution (and how the original women's movement was hijacked by social engineers - the original women's rights activists were against hormonal contraception and abortion) https://miriaf.co.uk/did-the-sexual-revolution-happen-by-accident/
Yes, thank you for this with the usual suspects of course. Later in the sixties there was also the 1967 Abortion Act to add into the mix and currently it seems only a matter of time before euthanasia is 'legalised' to bring us full circle, so to speak, from cradle to grave.
You can off yourself where I live. Call in the MAID to clean up the mess. Thousands of people so far and I sure don't believe the numbers they're publishing. Most likely many more.
I think you are absolutely right.
Miri, You are ahead of the game as usual. I wonder how long before the crackdown. G H Pember who wrote Earth's Earliest Ages about a century ago predicted the demise of men in society. I hope your eyesight does not become a serious problem and that you have prepared for the worst. I think few will realise what is in prospect in answer to your question, as you imply.
Thank you, John, and I will check out G H Pember. My eyesight should be okay, thanks - it's an inherited problem that did blind my grandfather and great-grandmother, but the main danger period is childhood whilst one is still growing. I did nearly lose my sight aged 9 via detached retinas, but fortunately, fast acting surgeons were able to save it and so while I'll always have rather subpar eyesight, I'm unlikely to lose it altogether. My mother, who is 22 years older than me with the same condition, has not, so, as always, I live in hope!
My mother had macular degeneration and became registered blind but did retain some (difficult to know how much) peripheral vision. Glad you are on top of things. I am unaffected . Pember became a Christian at university studying classics. The book started as an investigation into spiritism but became much broader. He was way before his time and regrettably is not mainstream, despite belonging to the Brethren, open rather than exclusive I believe. I have to catch up on your previous posts as I am a recent subscriber. One post invariably leads to one or more others.
Hi again Miri, I have searched my copy of EEA but cannot find the passages that I am sure are there. It's a big read so please don't waste your valuable time on it. It was many years ago that I first read it and I regard it as foundational to end time prophecy. Others don't share that view!
Netflix series or a film is no doubts on the way. The amount of tools to manipulate peoples mind and level of efficiency of them is staggering now. The changes that took decades in making 50-70 years ago, now would take a few years.
Thank you Miri for your valuable work.
Thank you, Dmitri, and I agree entirely - the acceleration of social change made possible by immersive technology is astounding, and chilling.
Just one quote from the New York Post: oh, only ten men, that’s a drop in the bucket nowadays”.
It’s fun trawling through the comments, in: Daily Mail, reviews on Amazon, Waterstones, The Times, etc. .. such a dizzy array of erraticism and unpredictability: hell is other people, I guess. And very much like one of the links you supplied: the case against, ‘Louise Perry’ (fabulous, btw) a definite case of controlled Opp/intel asset ( and I remember ploughing through three Germaine Greer books before thinking: hang on a minute, mate, your having a laugh?) so, very much in agreement with the general sentiment.
And to be honest, it wouldn’t really matter who wrote ‘Ruskins’ book/novel/diary of a modern day feminist, or whatever. Because it’s the lies and deceit of the powers that shouldn’t be, which must prevail: there was a point where I even considered that the ‘Confessions of Kitty’ may even have been knocked up by ChatGPT.?
You really have to wonder what her next ‘project’ might be. .. I’m sure the production team are eagerly pulling ideas together round the drawing board, as we ponder our next expensive trip to the supermarket. Hopefully negotiating it successfully - without being drugged and thrown in the back of a taxi. As you can guess I haven’t actually read the book, and have no intention of doing so. I’ll wait for the Netflix offering. Or ‘kitty’s next construct’ …
As discussed in earlier pieces; the whole point is to design and fabricate narratives, with the intention to wind up as many citizens as possible. Keep it divisive: men against women; woke / anti woke, right against left.etc, etc. But there really is something so exquisitely poetic (in a very dark sense, obviously) about the sexism angle, that really resonates with lots of punters. And therefore must constantly be exploited by our overlords. Too good to waste this one. Still huge mileage to be had out of it… Now then, where was I … oh yes.. the dating app. Gotta make up for lost time.. hmm !!?
Thanks Dean, and yes, I did consider whether the book was fabricated / fictional (as many "memoirs" are, mentioning no names, "Dr. Oxford"...), but having read it, I am sure that it is not. It has the unmistakeable ring of human-written authenticity (I strongly suspect much of it was lifted from a diary, and/or confessional letters to friends).
I think Louise Perry and Kitty Ruskin are both being used to fulfil an agenda, but I think the difference is, Louise Perry is fully aware of this and complicit (she is after all a foundational member of ARC), whereas Ruskin is simply a "useful idiot", who has written a genuine account of her life which the overlords have realised they can use and weaponise.
It will be very interesting and revealing to see if Louise Perry comments on Ruskin's book.
Another Miri remarkable. Thanks
Thank you, Hugh!
I reckon the supreme example of pseudo-intellectual sexual numbness indoctrination is Seinfeld where, under a posturing air of Beckettian existential angst or whatever, we get four mercilessly shallow, callous and utterly selfish individuals grinding through an interminable series of meaningless sexual encounters that never seem to teach them anything whatsoever. This is another example of how a stultifying personal crippling can be induced through an appeal to the viewer's vanity by presenting a “cerebral” front.