Apologies for the rather maudlin introduction, but this is an ineffably true statement of fact: nobody does, including and especially when it is their own cat. Therefore, in successfully marketing the government's new push for the mandatory microchipping
This makes a lot of sense when seen in the context of all the other piecemeal, tip toe changes towards a more technocratic, trans-human existence but it is just so chilling and unpalatable when you contemplate the depth, scale and psychopathy of their planning.
I won’t be getting any cats microchipped as I don’t “own” a cat - there just happens to be a cat that spends a lot of time in my house of it’s own free will.
We'll get a day's notice that your theory is true when, the day before she's "found" alive and well, all reference to this article is scrubbed from the internet.
I only got round to watching the Richard D Hall video of Peter Hyatt’s statement analysis last year.
The ‘evidence’ presented in that film makes it seem cut and dried that the McCann’s killed her (or so I thought at the time).
It was only after watching that film and subsequently mentioning it to a few people that I realised they were already convinced the parents had killed her, even though they hadn’t seen that film.
As you say, it appears to be a very commonly held view, even with ‘normies’, so they must have been steered in that direction by the media.
Exactly Mick, excellent point. If the establishment really wanted to demonise “conspiracy theories”, as we know they do, then they have to prove that a very major one that a lot of people to subscribe to, isn’t true. Well, what is bigger than the McCann case? It’s the perfect weapon to discredit “conspiracy theories” and those who share them.
Very very plausible indeed. Time will tell and if you are right I guess it will be soon...Elon Musk just announced the first chip from Neuralink has gone into a human ... very close now!
Just read an article by Battersea rescue centre saying that they were only able to reunite 2% of their missing cats with their owners, though elsewhere in the article they state that “only 3 in 5” (60%) of these cats have microchips - so where’s the actual evidence that this measure has any significant impact on reuniting cats with owners?
This makes a lot of sense when seen in the context of all the other piecemeal, tip toe changes towards a more technocratic, trans-human existence but it is just so chilling and unpalatable when you contemplate the depth, scale and psychopathy of their planning.
I won’t be getting any cats microchipped as I don’t “own” a cat - there just happens to be a cat that spends a lot of time in my house of it’s own free will.
We'll get a day's notice that your theory is true when, the day before she's "found" alive and well, all reference to this article is scrubbed from the internet.
I only got round to watching the Richard D Hall video of Peter Hyatt’s statement analysis last year.
The ‘evidence’ presented in that film makes it seem cut and dried that the McCann’s killed her (or so I thought at the time).
It was only after watching that film and subsequently mentioning it to a few people that I realised they were already convinced the parents had killed her, even though they hadn’t seen that film.
As you say, it appears to be a very commonly held view, even with ‘normies’, so they must have been steered in that direction by the media.
Exactly Mick, excellent point. If the establishment really wanted to demonise “conspiracy theories”, as we know they do, then they have to prove that a very major one that a lot of people to subscribe to, isn’t true. Well, what is bigger than the McCann case? It’s the perfect weapon to discredit “conspiracy theories” and those who share them.
Very very plausible indeed. Time will tell and if you are right I guess it will be soon...Elon Musk just announced the first chip from Neuralink has gone into a human ... very close now!
Very interesting. You make some extremely pertinent points. We are being played.
Just read an article by Battersea rescue centre saying that they were only able to reunite 2% of their missing cats with their owners, though elsewhere in the article they state that “only 3 in 5” (60%) of these cats have microchips - so where’s the actual evidence that this measure has any significant impact on reuniting cats with owners?