Yes, I saw that! I would say "unbelievable", but sadly it is all too predictable... and a Happy New Year to you, too (which is really in April, of course ;).
Some social media commenters wondered why the permanent, rising steel road barrier at the entrance to Bourbon Street was not operational and replaced with free-standing, orange marker drums. (The US equivalent of our traffic cones).
Others had noticed that many venues across Europe were cancelled because of bad weather, which didn't seem too bad, while those in London remarked upon the huge numbers of armed police attending.
Was the word given to authorities that a terrorist attack was most likely, making the outcome, if staged, plausible?
Excellent, Miri, I completely agree (and didn't accept the stories in the first place). And I, too, will never be voting for Farage or Reform (and of course not for Labour or the Tories). What a crazy world.
It is convenient that all the perpetrators of these acts are nearly always "lone wolves" and are usually killed at the scene of the crime thereby obviating the need for any sort of enquiry as to the how and why of their actions. Are they using the same playbook?
Are you going to be reintroducing the recorded missives soon? I know that I am not the only one who has requested this, but I also know that there were some technical difficulties your end. Are these resolved? Can we look forward to hearing your dulcet tones sooner rather than later? I do hope so.
Hi Doris, yes, this operation is underway! I've tried to record directly to Substack., but there is a glitch that keeps speeding my voice up to double speed and as yet I've been unable to resolve it. In the meantime, Substack has installed an AI autoreader (a play arrow at the top right of articles), which isn't ideal, but I have at least managed to change the voice from an American male to British female....
Great news, although I must say the sound of your voice at double speed is probably highly amusing! I will look forward to hearing your voice in due course but will try the AI voice in the meantime, despite my resistance to most things AI, being old school. By the way, did you get my message regarding Torben's subscription? Please respond to my email address, which you should have, if you haven't received it. Ta duck, as they say in N-u-L!
Yes, if all else fails I will put up the double-speed version for entertainment purposes! I haven't received such a message from you, but I do indeed have your email so will message you there.
MSM made multiple claims about both attacks - the individuals acted alone, they were part of a team, they were poor, they were rich, they were all-American, one went to Egypt 'for 10 days'.
The whole thing smacks of crude manipulation, and designed to keep the real reasons - what ever they may be - as far away as possible from the public.
One nasty aspect - using heavier than usual electric vehicles either to cause a batt fire (Las Vegas - failed) or take advantage of a large frunk (New Orleans) suggests some real info was exposed, probably by accident. The manipulators are getting lazy.
My default with these types of 'events' is to point my finger at the masters of perception management in western intelligence agencies (actually Russia has the same dynamic, immigrant flooding coupled with false flags ). I supposed there may be some copy cat killers here or there but they are much more rare the full fledge intelligence psyops, when it comes to high media impct events
Obviously, the same forces that flooded western nations with immigrants conduct these 'terror' events for a variety of reasons and through a variety of means. I suspect the false flag factory will be kicking out Muslims more frequently for the forseeable future as Israel moves on to the next phase of the greater Israel project. I think you will find empathy or concern for Palestinians preciptiously drops around these events. Right before 9/11 there was growing irritation with Israel. The public consciouness molding attack snuffed that right out. Trump has even campaigned on erradicating anti semitism. I am looking forward to see how he puts that into action
With that said, the people concerned with the massive demographic shifts that occured over the past two decades have valid concerns outside of these events. Unfortunately many of them jump on these events a little too gleefully to prove their points. And I am old enough to remember these same people were encouraging the destruction of the middle east (Which directly caused millions fleeing to other parts of the world) to 'fight them over there'
I don't use the term "false flag" anymore as I've never seen an event where what happens is that A accuses B of crime C involving injury and death that A is really responsible for. The reality is that in crime C the death and injury are always staged including for 9/11 which was fundamentally the greatest demolition job of all time where full evacuations were conducted prior as per standard protocols. "False flag" is simply the narrative for the disbelievers. "Psyop" is a catch-all that better describes ALL their mind control events of whatever nature. Two fundamental rules of psyops:
--- They do want they want for real and fake the rest ... it's all about mind control not doing things for real unless they're wanted for real.
--- They always tell us the truth underneath the propaganda according to their Revelation of the Method rule aka Hidden in Plain Sight aka the Emperor's New Clothes.
I think the actual truth matters greatly as is how we are all mind-controlled - believers and disbelievers alike - to not have the actual truth. A half-truth is the same as a lie so if 90% believe that it was terrorists armed with boxcutters and 9% believe it was the US government who was responsible for killing all those poor people in the buildings then only 1% or less really understand the fundamental nature of 9/11: demolition job in the guise of a massive anti-terror exercise in the further guise of a real terror event.
We KNOW the actual truth is very important because of the massive propaganda campaign targeted to the anticipated disbelievers of the 9/11 story to make them believe - like the believers - that people really died. If the truth of staged death and injury weren't so important there wouldn't be such a huuuuugggge propaganda campaign to target the disbelievers to not recognise it .... although as always they have employed their Revelation of the Method technique to tell us clearly that death and injury were staged, eg, the clear signs that the images of the injured show "drill" injured people, the reporter outside the hospital and trauma centre reporting no injured being admitted and empty ambulances rolling past, obviously fake dead people, etc.
The alleged victim family members are simply examples of actors commonly hired for these events just like the Manchester bombing, Sandy Hook, etc.
Truthers mock the notion that on the only day in history three high rise steel frame buildings came down by fire but what about the notion that on the only day in history, demolition professionals left people in buildings for a terror story. Sure, there are thousands and thousands of health professionals delivering toxic jabs to people that in a significant number of cases will injure, maim or kill them but that is possible on the back of over 200 years of fraudulent medical science. There's no way to persuade or coerce demolition professionals to leave people behind for a terror story and they didn't want to kill people then whereas they clearly want to kill people with the covid psyop. Moreover, hundreds of people needed to be involved in 9/11 and killing people for real simply would have been impracticable to the point of impossible.
If you have any evidence that anyone died please let me know.
I would disagree with eveything you say. I suspect you became interested in the topic after 2010-12. Typically people's views on it distort the further from reality the further away from the event that they started researching it. After 2007-8 it became very hard to research as the internet was just flooded with garbage. The 'nobody died' crowd showed up way late in the discussion
The vast majority of 'truthers' are clueless . And that is just proof that counter intelligence is effective. I swore of discussing it around 2009, most of the OGas got old, irritated with it and moved on
I was closely involved since 2004. Though knew they wanted it on the day of.
My friends made the documentary 'Press for Truth' which was the story of the 9/11 widows beig stonewalled by the Bush administration. I went to DC several times between 2005-2007 to meet up with others involved, including recently decesed political assassition researcher John Judge, who lived in DC , at the time.
I watched notorious left wingers like Noam Chomsky and Amy Goodman spit venom all over the notion. Because Bush was on the right, skepiticism came from the left. The establishment left perpetually shit on anybody who had the temerity to question the official story. Sadly, If anything had a shot to stop the war, 9/11 truth was it. But Alex Jones came in and it became deemed a 'right wing' conspiracy lol
It was around 2006 when the movement really got fractured, and as time went on and more and more silly theories came out it fractured the movement further. I'd say around 2010 it was completely dead
Yes people died in the towers and planes. Though the area of the pentagon that got hit was underconstructuion., And some people who worked in the towers were alerted and did not go to work that day
9/11 victims compensation fund payed out billions of dollars to families. WIth that they had to sign an NDA
Not everybody signed
I've chosen to go to court rather than accept a payoff from the 9/11 victims compensation fund. Instead, I want to know what went so wrong with our intelligence and security systems that a band of religious fanatics was able to turn four U.S passenger jets into an enemy force, attack our cities and kill 3,000 civilians with terrifying ease. I want to know why two 110-story skyscrapers collapsed in less than two hours and why escape and rescue options were so limited. . . . The victims fund was not created in a spirit of compassion. Rather, it was a tacit acknowledgement by Congress that it tampered with our civil justice system in an unprecedented way. . . . So I say to Congress, big business and everyone who conspired to divert attention from government and private-sector failures: My husband's life was priceless, and I will not let his death be meaningless. My silence cannot be bought.[13]
You're right that I did come to 9/11 truth late - 2014 - but I'd say that was very much an advantage because by that time I think there was far greater awareness of the phenomenon of controlled opposition and how massively it was controlling the truth narrative and - of course - by that time there was the awareness of death and injury being faked although I only learnt of the research on the fakery of the memorial photos in 2016 (https://fakeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/9-11-9-the-Vicsim-Report.pdf). However, even with the recognition that some victims were clearly faked and the knowledge that the passenger airliner deaths were obviously faked as the crashes were faked I was still in thrall to some of the propaganda - the outraged Bob McIlvaine, Jersey Widows, April Gallop - and the alleged targeting of particular people in the buildings. It wasn't until 2018 that I finally "got it" in an epiphany.
As I say, if you have any clear evidence of the deaths of any of the 3,000 alleged dead or any clear evidence of injury occurring on 9/11 to any of the alleged 6,000 injured I'd be most interested. If you don't have any then I rest my case.
I can't believe somebody spent so much time on that 80 page report basically saying nobody died of course it doesn't really prove anything. Proving negatives is impossible. But it really doesn't attempt to debunk anything either. It debunks it's own strawmen
I said in my last comment, you can actually do a little work to verify within a relative amount of certainity yourself. I mean people can get to the point where they will just say everything is faked and its useless
That report basically politicallty paralyzes people. It doesn't really deal with anything
My friends interviewed 2 of the widows in 2005. That report calls them cosplayers. lol
I never thought to grill my friend on their veracity. Because it would have seemed completely ridiculous
These are port authority workers who (alledgely) died on that day. You can find their obituaries if you dig a little. I am sure with a little more digging you could find more information on these people's lives, families ,. etc... Also that their familes recieved money from the 9/11 victims compansation fund, which is also publiuc record If you care about truth you'd have a hard time explaing such a complex scheme to invent victims and their families and a huge amount of details along with that.
Planes flew into towers, towers collpsed. How the buildings fell is a side discussion.
People died in the planes, buildings and on the ground
It does not take much effort to come up with a lot of evidence that people died. But you have to make the effort
What you're presenting is purported evidence of the type I'm aware of. What I'm asking for is CLEAR evidence. We expect people's names with photos to be presented as evidence for the dead people but how is that clear evidence?
I'm aware of the obituaries - and? This kind of evidence is presented for other events where the disbelievers recognise the death and injury as staged such as, of course, the on-people's-lips-at-the-moment Manchester Bombing.
Where is the evidence that favours real over fake?
I recommend reading the vicsim report and also just having a quick peruse of my articles, eg, Nonsensicalities in the firefighter "oral" histories exposes the firefighter testimonies as fabricated and the very interesting fact that in precisely ZERO of any of the 118 testimonies is there any reference to any of the alleged deaths of 343 of the firefighters' colleagues.
Brilliant. I was thinking earlier today, generally, about reserving any "judgment" on New Year's Eve in New Orleans. Then on January 1, the "cyber truck" explodes at the hotel in Las Vegas. Full spectrum skepticism now rules, I realize largely for the reasons you just clearly laid out.
BTW, Miri, the link through to Mr Sudden Jabber doing 'the predictable hand sign' took me to a page that apparently didn't exist - that was quick work on 'their' part!
I went there and it exists for me in Australia although rather hilariously there's a graphic warning message so you have to click Show to see it. God knows what the graphic warning is for.
Oh yes, that worked, thank you, Miri. That sign is a total give-away. (But, BTW, I can usually see other things sent me by friends which are X/Twitter...)
Thanks for your analysis and always interesting joining of dots, Miri. I have to say I think the election of Reform seems pretty radical but you have your finger far better on the pulse than I do. So curious to see if your prediction comes true.
I always enjoy your articles Miri and I hope you don’t mind if I go slightly off topic – though this also relates to the general fear drumming that is now an everyday part of the news.
I just caught this wave of oozing paranoia off the BBC about skyrocketing flu cases and felt that none of this constant viral hysteria prodding would have had a hope of working without the massive epic horror franchise of covid that started in 2020. Basically, the world’s population has been “softened up” to provide fertile ground for this spook fest over what may well be nothing out of the ordinary i.e. that the normal processes of life have been made to look like the stuff of Hollywood post-apocalyptic zombie movies.
If there is anything notably different in rate and number of illnesses then I reckon it’s in the nature of self-fulfilling prophecy where the heightened state of fear causes physical deterioration. Also, the fact that services had been stripped back (e.g. people less able to access direct advice from doctors and wards minimised etc.) has a detrimental effect too. And then there is the questionable effect of these “vaccines”.
And it struck me that there has been no difference in the news coverage since 2020 – save that the word “covid” doesn’t appear so much. But the word “pressure” appears six times. And this bit rang a bell:
“The head of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine told the BBC that pressure on hospitals is "unacceptably awful" and flu is pushing them to breaking point.”
As the covid hysteria was gathering momentum in late 2020, I heard a newsreader say, “Pressure on the NHS is off the scale” and couldn’t believe she’d said that. It was pure Hollywood hokum. I expected her to follow up with, “Oh my God, it’s not human!” and “It’s a slim chance but it might just work!”
Elon Musk has apparently been demanding the release of Tommy Robinson on X too. Which is just a coincidence I am sure.
Divide and conquer. Setting us against each other instead of against them. Happy new year lol
Yes, I saw that! I would say "unbelievable", but sadly it is all too predictable... and a Happy New Year to you, too (which is really in April, of course ;).
Some social media commenters wondered why the permanent, rising steel road barrier at the entrance to Bourbon Street was not operational and replaced with free-standing, orange marker drums. (The US equivalent of our traffic cones).
Others had noticed that many venues across Europe were cancelled because of bad weather, which didn't seem too bad, while those in London remarked upon the huge numbers of armed police attending.
Was the word given to authorities that a terrorist attack was most likely, making the outcome, if staged, plausible?
A thought-provoking piece as usual Miri.
Thank you.
Thanks Kevin, and very interesting further detail.
Excellent, Miri, I completely agree (and didn't accept the stories in the first place). And I, too, will never be voting for Farage or Reform (and of course not for Labour or the Tories). What a crazy world.
In the U.S., it's like being smeared as a "libtard" by "Trumptards" for not voting for the new messiah.
It is convenient that all the perpetrators of these acts are nearly always "lone wolves" and are usually killed at the scene of the crime thereby obviating the need for any sort of enquiry as to the how and why of their actions. Are they using the same playbook?
Are you going to be reintroducing the recorded missives soon? I know that I am not the only one who has requested this, but I also know that there were some technical difficulties your end. Are these resolved? Can we look forward to hearing your dulcet tones sooner rather than later? I do hope so.
Hi Doris, yes, this operation is underway! I've tried to record directly to Substack., but there is a glitch that keeps speeding my voice up to double speed and as yet I've been unable to resolve it. In the meantime, Substack has installed an AI autoreader (a play arrow at the top right of articles), which isn't ideal, but I have at least managed to change the voice from an American male to British female....
Great news, although I must say the sound of your voice at double speed is probably highly amusing! I will look forward to hearing your voice in due course but will try the AI voice in the meantime, despite my resistance to most things AI, being old school. By the way, did you get my message regarding Torben's subscription? Please respond to my email address, which you should have, if you haven't received it. Ta duck, as they say in N-u-L!
Yes, if all else fails I will put up the double-speed version for entertainment purposes! I haven't received such a message from you, but I do indeed have your email so will message you there.
Bravo, excellent.
Thank you!
Well, that was good to digest.
MSM made multiple claims about both attacks - the individuals acted alone, they were part of a team, they were poor, they were rich, they were all-American, one went to Egypt 'for 10 days'.
The whole thing smacks of crude manipulation, and designed to keep the real reasons - what ever they may be - as far away as possible from the public.
One nasty aspect - using heavier than usual electric vehicles either to cause a batt fire (Las Vegas - failed) or take advantage of a large frunk (New Orleans) suggests some real info was exposed, probably by accident. The manipulators are getting lazy.
Yes, we deserve better quality psy-ops.
The fact we can sense what is going on suggests those who think they are better are not....
That's one reason for the engineered Western political swing to the right."
Trump is literally a replay of Reagan
Instead of DEI and trans, the 70s had affirmative action and the insideous child liberation movement
Reagan literally ran on 'Make America Great Again' and rode the anti woke wave into the white house with the 'moral majority' as his base
This is literally a cheap replay
Trump has absolutely no social conservatism in his campaignn as opposed to Reagan. The RNC convention talked about how much Trump loves the gays lol
My default with these types of 'events' is to point my finger at the masters of perception management in western intelligence agencies (actually Russia has the same dynamic, immigrant flooding coupled with false flags ). I supposed there may be some copy cat killers here or there but they are much more rare the full fledge intelligence psyops, when it comes to high media impct events
Obviously, the same forces that flooded western nations with immigrants conduct these 'terror' events for a variety of reasons and through a variety of means. I suspect the false flag factory will be kicking out Muslims more frequently for the forseeable future as Israel moves on to the next phase of the greater Israel project. I think you will find empathy or concern for Palestinians preciptiously drops around these events. Right before 9/11 there was growing irritation with Israel. The public consciouness molding attack snuffed that right out. Trump has even campaigned on erradicating anti semitism. I am looking forward to see how he puts that into action
With that said, the people concerned with the massive demographic shifts that occured over the past two decades have valid concerns outside of these events. Unfortunately many of them jump on these events a little too gleefully to prove their points. And I am old enough to remember these same people were encouraging the destruction of the middle east (Which directly caused millions fleeing to other parts of the world) to 'fight them over there'
I don't use the term "false flag" anymore as I've never seen an event where what happens is that A accuses B of crime C involving injury and death that A is really responsible for. The reality is that in crime C the death and injury are always staged including for 9/11 which was fundamentally the greatest demolition job of all time where full evacuations were conducted prior as per standard protocols. "False flag" is simply the narrative for the disbelievers. "Psyop" is a catch-all that better describes ALL their mind control events of whatever nature. Two fundamental rules of psyops:
--- They do want they want for real and fake the rest ... it's all about mind control not doing things for real unless they're wanted for real.
--- They always tell us the truth underneath the propaganda according to their Revelation of the Method rule aka Hidden in Plain Sight aka the Emperor's New Clothes.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/are-false-flags-a-thing
It doesn't really matter if the causalities are real or not. That the blame is directed at some enemy is all that matters.
If you are saying nobody died in 9/11, well, the victim family members were like the original 9/11 truth movement.
By 2006 they kind of got turned off once the no planes crowd took over.
I think the actual truth matters greatly as is how we are all mind-controlled - believers and disbelievers alike - to not have the actual truth. A half-truth is the same as a lie so if 90% believe that it was terrorists armed with boxcutters and 9% believe it was the US government who was responsible for killing all those poor people in the buildings then only 1% or less really understand the fundamental nature of 9/11: demolition job in the guise of a massive anti-terror exercise in the further guise of a real terror event.
We KNOW the actual truth is very important because of the massive propaganda campaign targeted to the anticipated disbelievers of the 9/11 story to make them believe - like the believers - that people really died. If the truth of staged death and injury weren't so important there wouldn't be such a huuuuugggge propaganda campaign to target the disbelievers to not recognise it .... although as always they have employed their Revelation of the Method technique to tell us clearly that death and injury were staged, eg, the clear signs that the images of the injured show "drill" injured people, the reporter outside the hospital and trauma centre reporting no injured being admitted and empty ambulances rolling past, obviously fake dead people, etc.
The alleged victim family members are simply examples of actors commonly hired for these events just like the Manchester bombing, Sandy Hook, etc.
Truthers mock the notion that on the only day in history three high rise steel frame buildings came down by fire but what about the notion that on the only day in history, demolition professionals left people in buildings for a terror story. Sure, there are thousands and thousands of health professionals delivering toxic jabs to people that in a significant number of cases will injure, maim or kill them but that is possible on the back of over 200 years of fraudulent medical science. There's no way to persuade or coerce demolition professionals to leave people behind for a terror story and they didn't want to kill people then whereas they clearly want to kill people with the covid psyop. Moreover, hundreds of people needed to be involved in 9/11 and killing people for real simply would have been impracticable to the point of impossible.
If you have any evidence that anyone died please let me know.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911
I would disagree with eveything you say. I suspect you became interested in the topic after 2010-12. Typically people's views on it distort the further from reality the further away from the event that they started researching it. After 2007-8 it became very hard to research as the internet was just flooded with garbage. The 'nobody died' crowd showed up way late in the discussion
The vast majority of 'truthers' are clueless . And that is just proof that counter intelligence is effective. I swore of discussing it around 2009, most of the OGas got old, irritated with it and moved on
I was closely involved since 2004. Though knew they wanted it on the day of.
My friends made the documentary 'Press for Truth' which was the story of the 9/11 widows beig stonewalled by the Bush administration. I went to DC several times between 2005-2007 to meet up with others involved, including recently decesed political assassition researcher John Judge, who lived in DC , at the time.
I watched notorious left wingers like Noam Chomsky and Amy Goodman spit venom all over the notion. Because Bush was on the right, skepiticism came from the left. The establishment left perpetually shit on anybody who had the temerity to question the official story. Sadly, If anything had a shot to stop the war, 9/11 truth was it. But Alex Jones came in and it became deemed a 'right wing' conspiracy lol
It was around 2006 when the movement really got fractured, and as time went on and more and more silly theories came out it fractured the movement further. I'd say around 2010 it was completely dead
Yes people died in the towers and planes. Though the area of the pentagon that got hit was underconstructuion., And some people who worked in the towers were alerted and did not go to work that day
9/11 victims compensation fund payed out billions of dollars to families. WIth that they had to sign an NDA
Not everybody signed
I've chosen to go to court rather than accept a payoff from the 9/11 victims compensation fund. Instead, I want to know what went so wrong with our intelligence and security systems that a band of religious fanatics was able to turn four U.S passenger jets into an enemy force, attack our cities and kill 3,000 civilians with terrifying ease. I want to know why two 110-story skyscrapers collapsed in less than two hours and why escape and rescue options were so limited. . . . The victims fund was not created in a spirit of compassion. Rather, it was a tacit acknowledgement by Congress that it tampered with our civil justice system in an unprecedented way. . . . So I say to Congress, big business and everyone who conspired to divert attention from government and private-sector failures: My husband's life was priceless, and I will not let his death be meaningless. My silence cannot be bought.[13]
You're right that I did come to 9/11 truth late - 2014 - but I'd say that was very much an advantage because by that time I think there was far greater awareness of the phenomenon of controlled opposition and how massively it was controlling the truth narrative and - of course - by that time there was the awareness of death and injury being faked although I only learnt of the research on the fakery of the memorial photos in 2016 (https://fakeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/9-11-9-the-Vicsim-Report.pdf). However, even with the recognition that some victims were clearly faked and the knowledge that the passenger airliner deaths were obviously faked as the crashes were faked I was still in thrall to some of the propaganda - the outraged Bob McIlvaine, Jersey Widows, April Gallop - and the alleged targeting of particular people in the buildings. It wasn't until 2018 that I finally "got it" in an epiphany.
As I say, if you have any clear evidence of the deaths of any of the 3,000 alleged dead or any clear evidence of injury occurring on 9/11 to any of the alleged 6,000 injured I'd be most interested. If you don't have any then I rest my case.
I can't believe somebody spent so much time on that 80 page report basically saying nobody died of course it doesn't really prove anything. Proving negatives is impossible. But it really doesn't attempt to debunk anything either. It debunks it's own strawmen
I said in my last comment, you can actually do a little work to verify within a relative amount of certainity yourself. I mean people can get to the point where they will just say everything is faked and its useless
That report basically politicallty paralyzes people. It doesn't really deal with anything
My friends interviewed 2 of the widows in 2005. That report calls them cosplayers. lol
I never thought to grill my friend on their veracity. Because it would have seemed completely ridiculous
You are way to disconnected
Here ya go.
These are port authority workers who (alledgely) died on that day. You can find their obituaries if you dig a little. I am sure with a little more digging you could find more information on these people's lives, families ,. etc... Also that their familes recieved money from the 9/11 victims compansation fund, which is also publiuc record If you care about truth you'd have a hard time explaing such a complex scheme to invent victims and their families and a huge amount of details along with that.
Planes flew into towers, towers collpsed. How the buildings fell is a side discussion.
People died in the planes, buildings and on the ground
It does not take much effort to come up with a lot of evidence that people died. But you have to make the effort
https://www.panynj.gov/port-authority/en/about/remembrance/their-names-and-faces-will-never-be-forgotten.html#911wtcbombing
What you're presenting is purported evidence of the type I'm aware of. What I'm asking for is CLEAR evidence. We expect people's names with photos to be presented as evidence for the dead people but how is that clear evidence?
I'm aware of the obituaries - and? This kind of evidence is presented for other events where the disbelievers recognise the death and injury as staged such as, of course, the on-people's-lips-at-the-moment Manchester Bombing.
Where is the evidence that favours real over fake?
I recommend reading the vicsim report and also just having a quick peruse of my articles, eg, Nonsensicalities in the firefighter "oral" histories exposes the firefighter testimonies as fabricated and the very interesting fact that in precisely ZERO of any of the 118 testimonies is there any reference to any of the alleged deaths of 343 of the firefighters' colleagues.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911
Brilliant. I was thinking earlier today, generally, about reserving any "judgment" on New Year's Eve in New Orleans. Then on January 1, the "cyber truck" explodes at the hotel in Las Vegas. Full spectrum skepticism now rules, I realize largely for the reasons you just clearly laid out.
BTW, Miri, the link through to Mr Sudden Jabber doing 'the predictable hand sign' took me to a page that apparently didn't exist - that was quick work on 'their' part!
I went there and it exists for me in Australia although rather hilariously there's a graphic warning message so you have to click Show to see it. God knows what the graphic warning is for.
How weird! Does that mean that ‘our lot’ here in the UK are tightening the screws on us more than in Australia?
Hi Priscilla, it could be that you can't view it because you're not on Twitter/X, which is where I linked to. Try this link instead... https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GgPB0y9bUAIjzNT?format=jpg&name=900x900
Oh yes, that worked, thank you, Miri. That sign is a total give-away. (But, BTW, I can usually see other things sent me by friends which are X/Twitter...)
Thanks for your analysis and always interesting joining of dots, Miri. I have to say I think the election of Reform seems pretty radical but you have your finger far better on the pulse than I do. So curious to see if your prediction comes true.
Thank you Petra, and I think Monday (petition debate day) should prove very interesting!
For doubters of staged events: have a look at the video: The Boston Unbombing
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZaphLU01lf3Q
Unfortunately for the fake event organisers, a member of the public took over 150 photos and saved them on Flickr 🤣
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hahatango/albums/72157633252445135/
I always enjoy your articles Miri and I hope you don’t mind if I go slightly off topic – though this also relates to the general fear drumming that is now an everyday part of the news.
I just caught this wave of oozing paranoia off the BBC about skyrocketing flu cases and felt that none of this constant viral hysteria prodding would have had a hope of working without the massive epic horror franchise of covid that started in 2020. Basically, the world’s population has been “softened up” to provide fertile ground for this spook fest over what may well be nothing out of the ordinary i.e. that the normal processes of life have been made to look like the stuff of Hollywood post-apocalyptic zombie movies.
If there is anything notably different in rate and number of illnesses then I reckon it’s in the nature of self-fulfilling prophecy where the heightened state of fear causes physical deterioration. Also, the fact that services had been stripped back (e.g. people less able to access direct advice from doctors and wards minimised etc.) has a detrimental effect too. And then there is the questionable effect of these “vaccines”.
In any case, here is a taste of the show:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c047ky5qv4ro
And it struck me that there has been no difference in the news coverage since 2020 – save that the word “covid” doesn’t appear so much. But the word “pressure” appears six times. And this bit rang a bell:
“The head of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine told the BBC that pressure on hospitals is "unacceptably awful" and flu is pushing them to breaking point.”
As the covid hysteria was gathering momentum in late 2020, I heard a newsreader say, “Pressure on the NHS is off the scale” and couldn’t believe she’d said that. It was pure Hollywood hokum. I expected her to follow up with, “Oh my God, it’s not human!” and “It’s a slim chance but it might just work!”
test
Many thanks for your work and insights Miri...please keep going.
Warm regards