An excellent article, Miri, loaded with astute observations and insights.
If only more people realised that the NHS has become a fascist arm of Orwellian dystopian government. Was it planned that way from its (secret agenda) origins after world war two? To generate the facade of 'caring for your health' when really it's about its hidden inverted agenda of becoming a monster illness dependency (and eugenics) industry. "They" don't care about our health. At all. The mass deception is monstrous.
The loneliness factor is a stark and often overlooked issue. We've all been cruelly divided by Convid-1984 psyopia since 2020. The truth and freedom information war is highly divisive. Many of us are isolated and hardened, possibly bitter and entrenched - not good for our health. Staying joyfully defiant is a constant challenge.
Thank you, Nigel, and you are absolutely right about the NHS. I believe that was always the intention of the NHS, to enable the establishment to have complete control over our health by offering a "free" health service. Obviously we can't expect to have any agency or autonomy over something we're being offered for "free", we should just be jolly glad and grateful these great learned experts deign to offer us their services at all!
When people have to pay for things, they become active and demanding consumers who expect a certain standard of care and if they don't get it, vote with their wallets and opt out. But offering it for "free" (at least at the point of usage) strips people of their agency and consumer rights, they become passive recipients who just accept what they're given. It's a stroke of devious genius for depopulationists really, because we're obviously suspicious if a soldier with a gun approaches us and tries to inject us with something, but if it's a doctor with a white coat....
Yes, absolutely. Free to the point of being free from suspicion by a grateful nation after the trauma of war, only to be lulled into more long-term indoctrination.
Bizarrely, this has just reminded me of one of my favourite stories as a child, called "Flat Stanley" - who was mysteriously crushed by a billboard and woke up the next morning only 1 inch thick. About 20 years ago, I bought the 40th anniversary edition of the book and was amused when I re-read it. The book retained its unique magic - but what did the distraught family first do? They consulted the family doctor (of course) 'who was an expert on these things and who would surely know what to do!' ... (Picture of concerned 'boffin' doctor with white coat, stethoscope and studious look, hand on chin, pondering solutions). The iconic image of doctors and the indoctrination by the 'science of medicine' runs very deep!
Even William Beveridge (the alleged architect of the NHS, who had connections to eugenics and was most definitely 'in the club'), in his third and final report pretty much admitted that they'd got it horribly terribly wrong.
Of course, he knew that it was going exactly as 'they' had planned - that it was too impersonal, and had become a conveyor belt for faceless, nameless 'customers', entirely dependent on 'gifts' from the daddy state, whose entire wealth is taken from them in the first place (and obviously, the notion that the NHS is somehow 'free' and 'benevolent' is more absurd now than it's ever been).
Yes, they might be generally good at accident and emergency type stuff (cuts, breakages and burns etc. - if you can get someone to see you!), but other than that the NHS has no real understanding of (or even interest in) the true nature of disease whatsoever, as it is nothing more than a 100% lackey for the pharmaceuticals, who ruthlessly demonise and stifle anything and everything that goes against their holy allopathic dogmas (which only dangerous heretics dare question!).
Unfortunately, very few people are aware of Beveridge's final report (which I think was 1949?), but even though key 'failings' were 'admitted', by that time the monster had well and truly been unleashed, and was well on course to becoming the stifling murderous monopoly it was always intended to be (despite the ongoing 'shop front').
Sadly, there are millions who literally 'worship' their dearly beloved NHS, many of whom are in utter despair because it's 'lost its way'.
But it's done no such thing, as it (and the 'welfare state' in general) was always intended to be used to control the masses by massively narrowing their options (and knowledge, which can only come from state approved 'experts'), and making them almost entirely dependent on a system that can be dismantled at will by the 'overlords', not least to give them the 'excuse' to 'build back better'.
And of course, by the time the 'gifts' they've been conditioned to be so thoroughly grateful for have been ruthlessly taken away from them, the clueless will literally be begging their masters to enforce almost any 'solution' to this oh-so unanticipated 'problem'.
Cue full-on social credit system...🦸 (all for 'the greater good', no less...✊).
Eustace Mullins has documented the links between the earliest days of the American Medical system and drugs. This type of medicine is concerned with symptoms never prevention.
The last time I was unfortunate enough to see a "doctor" was about five years ago, and the only reason I went was to arrange an x-ray for a bad back that was being treated by a chiropractor (I can't remember exactly what happened, but I ended up paying for it myself).
Anyway, the doctor said he'd make the referral, and then wrote out a prescription...
"Here you go", he said, "these will help".
"What's that for?"
"Just some anti-depressants - they'll help you sleep better".
"But I'm not having trouble sleeping."
"But I thought you were in pain - these will help."
"I'm having a bit of pain, yes, but it's not effecting my sleep."
"But these will help you to feel better - the pain must be getting you down."
"No, not at all - I just need a little work doing on my back."
"Oh, ok." (Holds out the prescription.) "Take these anyway, they'll definitely help."
"I don't want your pills, and I'm shocked that you're pushing them on me in this way."
"Oh, ok. Is there anything else I can help you with?"
I think you get the picture. And honestly, it was like talking to a robot - no personality - dead behind the eyes - just a shell of a human being, churning out shit for his masters, whilst being extremely well rewarded financially and socially (the way people put these clowns on pedestals is truly sickening).
What kickbacks was he getting from this?
What incentives for being nothing more than a glorified drug pusher?
I knew somebody once who was a secretary at a hospital. She told me how "glamorous" female representatives of pharmaceutical companies would turn up in high-heels and short-skirts, and would literally wine and dine the doctors, who would then go on to prescribe their drugs at an alarming rate.
And that's how it works - as most doctors are just clueless, mindless, careerists, who almost certainly went to medical school for no other reason than to get a well-paid, well-respected, job - one that also grants them high-status in a society dumbed down enough to see the gatekeeper professions (teacher, police officer, soldier, teacher, doctor etc.) as "respectable", when they are anything but to those who have come to the full realisation of who and what they're actually "protecting".
I remember going to see a doctor over 20 years ago (Dr Chakrabharti - I'll never forget his name). He was about to retire and didn't prescribe anything. He simply said, "I've been a doctor all my working life, and all I can say is that I'm thoroughly ashamed of my profession. Please stay away from doctors, and always look into the so-called 'alternatives'. And I'm not saying they're all perfect, but so-called 'doctors' only know what we've been taught by the pharmaceuticals, which is wrong and dangerous on so many levels, and I have to live with what I've been part of for the rest of my days."
It's a pity that he came to that conclusion at such a late stage. But how many doctors never admit that to themselves?
And how many people just take what they prescribe without question - because they've been conditioned to "trust the experts"?
How many are hopelessly addicted to dangerous, harmful drugs, whilst actually believe that they are taking them for the good of their health?
Twenty years ago, I worked in supported accommodation for adults with learning disabilities. Several staff noticed that the residents were given an unusually high amount of tablets, several times a day. We didn't get permission from the managers, but some of us decided to look into what they were taking, and why. Upon close scrutiny, we discovered that each and every one of them was on at least one repeat prescription for drugs that were prescribed YEARS ago for things that were no longer relevant (if they ever were in the first place?!). I don't remember all the details, but I do recall one chap being on extremely strong pain killers to help him with the pain from a minor operation he'd had TWENTY YEARS previously. And he was still being given them three times a day, EVERY day.
And trust me, we had to fight to get this stopped, as the local - "authority" managers insisted that this wasn't our remit, because we weren't "medically trained" (see comments re the Montgomery Ruling). They even tried to discipline us for looking into this in the first place, which was later over-ruled by a sympathetic senior manager.
And it's been many years since I worked there, but I'm absolutely certain that each and every one of those residents will now be multiple-jabbed and lined up for their boosters, just like the residents of older people's homes and the staff who continue to work there.
Yes it’s very odd that Mr Utley’s personal health observations passes quality control at the Daily Mail. Perhaps the dénouement will be that he will “pass away” suddenly and be a warning to us all not to dice with death. Much like the dire warnings now emanating from Jeremy Clarkson. Certainly the advice you have tendered (subject to the usual disclaimers ) is very sensible although if concerned over a health issue an alternative is to seek private advice which though expensive is more objective. David Cartland is also trying to establish a more independent source of advice as the Twitterati will know. Thanks for a considered article, again.
Well, once again supreme brain food from Miri AF, even if I missed the article from 1 year ago.
An aside.
As with other industrial processes, pharmaceutical companies use a network of organisations to explore potential ideas (typically Universities), PhD programmes to optimise such potions, independent companies to develop the potion including industrialisation which then feed into trials. Surprisingly for a science based system there is incredible level of group-think, bending of results and more. For example, the basic recipe often has huge errors, and when the prototype potion is made, basic process mistakes can be made. 'Spill' the potion and the temptation to literally or virtually 'scrape it off the lab floor' maybe too great. 'Time is money', and so on.
The whole system is a house of cards.
It is substantially less robust than almost anyone outside the sector could imagine.
Let's just say, the Covid-19 affair was not a surprise (random DNA or heavy metals, anyone?), nor was the group-think from the potion makers.
Bucket chemistry to solve problems which may not need such an approach.
Yes Miri, this article is also very interesting, and I agree....even if it cannot be generalized...I am telling you this as a cancer patient who recovered 17 years ago thanks to a colonoscopy and colon surgery.
Even though the operation went well, they advised me to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (therefore light)... although doubtful, I decided to have it so as not to tempt fate... I stopped it after a few treatments... I felt that it was really hurting me and I perceived it as dangerous for my life...despite the scandal and the disappointment of the treating doctors I'm still here :)
I really liked the part of your article on childhood vaccination and the intuition on the need to anticipate treatments to glorify their potential beneficial effects...At the end of November, with an association born in the "pandemic" era we organized the yet another conference and we will deal with childhood vaccination... some Italian regions are trying to inject the monoclonal therapy Nirsevimab into newborns before leaving the hospital... you know for the alleged Respiratory Syncytial Virus.... I will propose your intuition as a question to the experts...as always, excellent insight! Thank you!
p.s.: on this topic, go read the Japanese MELODY randomized double-blind study: the groups (vaccine-placebo) were followed for 511 days after the injection. No deaths occurred in the placebo group, while 5 deaths (0.25%) were reported in the Nirsevimab group.
Wow Miri...I agree wholeheartedly. I avoid doctors at all costs and have for years.
To anyone, I heartily recommend listening to Ron Piana (a really wonderful storyteller) who has done 2 interviews with Soft White Underbelly on Youtube.
First interview (2 months ago) called "Greed and the Pharmaceutical Industry" and the most recent (1 month ago) called "Curing Cancer (affordably)".
Normally I enjoy Miri's tests. Unfortunately I did not managed to finish reading this article, which is very long and at the same time very naive.
I am a breast radiologist. Has been working in this profession for more than 30 years.
Yes, there are cancers, which are harmless (grade 1 in 70 years old person); but the majority are life threatening and require treatment. The main treatment for breast cancer is surgery. Chemotherapy is used in a tiny minority of patients (mainly triple-negative cancers)
Mammography gives a very little dose of radiation (you get much more on a plane), at the same time it is a very good diagnostic tool.
The matter is very complex and require some knowledge and experience,
I'm sure this is complex and requires years of knowledge and experience but from MY experience, the breast cancer world is fraught with lies. Years and years and years of people donating to breast cancer research all over the world (who actually gets the millions of dollars donated because it certainly hasn't been cured, nor have the brutal remedies changed?). Happily, I can say they never got a dime from me.
You can't tell me that after decades that the only options are to flatten them in an excruciating way to find "something" or just simply chop them off or even, as you said, dose people with a sickening chemo "therapy". Oh, and if they can't find it through a mammogram, you'll be sent to ultrasound, where they are even more desperate to find "something" and I mean desperate. Thankfully, I woke up long ago to the invasive testing done on women and men and will never again.
I just don't have time to read all the comments above. I read Miri's article with interest and agree with some of it. I have quite often mentioned that my husband has multiple myeloma (diagnosed in Feb/March 2019) for which he has been treated ever since, currently with monoclonal antibody injections. Whatever you all say about the NHS, we are extremely grateful for what we have received. If my husband hadn't been diagnosed at a very early stage, he might have ended up like his brother-in-law's brother whose exact same cancer was only found at a very late stage and so he died with bones fracturing and splintering all over the place. Again, as I've said before, I met someone whose mother had refused any treatment for her multiple myeloma and she died in agony, with every movement resulting in splintering bones. Please remember that it's not always the right thing to ignore symptoms etc etc. My father died of prostate cancer (aged 89, so a good age) and was always on at younger men not to ignore the symptoms out of embarrassment. I do not think it is wise to write off the NHS completely or that kind of medicine. We had our regular appointment with our homeopath yesterday and he told us that it would have been impossible for my husband to have been treated by him as the support system simply isn't in place. It is wiser to balance the two alternative views (holistic and ordinary) side by side, using both where necessary. Is it really wise to tell people to ignore doctors altogether? I agree about things like statins and a lot of drugs, but there's a balance. I'm probably being a bit incoherent, but I get fed up having to repeat myself about all this, but also I'm time-pressured currently, so please forgive me! Balance, that's what I'd say is the main thing. Moderation in all things, as my mother used to say!
An excellent article, Miri, loaded with astute observations and insights.
If only more people realised that the NHS has become a fascist arm of Orwellian dystopian government. Was it planned that way from its (secret agenda) origins after world war two? To generate the facade of 'caring for your health' when really it's about its hidden inverted agenda of becoming a monster illness dependency (and eugenics) industry. "They" don't care about our health. At all. The mass deception is monstrous.
The loneliness factor is a stark and often overlooked issue. We've all been cruelly divided by Convid-1984 psyopia since 2020. The truth and freedom information war is highly divisive. Many of us are isolated and hardened, possibly bitter and entrenched - not good for our health. Staying joyfully defiant is a constant challenge.
Thank you, Nigel, and you are absolutely right about the NHS. I believe that was always the intention of the NHS, to enable the establishment to have complete control over our health by offering a "free" health service. Obviously we can't expect to have any agency or autonomy over something we're being offered for "free", we should just be jolly glad and grateful these great learned experts deign to offer us their services at all!
When people have to pay for things, they become active and demanding consumers who expect a certain standard of care and if they don't get it, vote with their wallets and opt out. But offering it for "free" (at least at the point of usage) strips people of their agency and consumer rights, they become passive recipients who just accept what they're given. It's a stroke of devious genius for depopulationists really, because we're obviously suspicious if a soldier with a gun approaches us and tries to inject us with something, but if it's a doctor with a white coat....
Yes, absolutely. Free to the point of being free from suspicion by a grateful nation after the trauma of war, only to be lulled into more long-term indoctrination.
Bizarrely, this has just reminded me of one of my favourite stories as a child, called "Flat Stanley" - who was mysteriously crushed by a billboard and woke up the next morning only 1 inch thick. About 20 years ago, I bought the 40th anniversary edition of the book and was amused when I re-read it. The book retained its unique magic - but what did the distraught family first do? They consulted the family doctor (of course) 'who was an expert on these things and who would surely know what to do!' ... (Picture of concerned 'boffin' doctor with white coat, stethoscope and studious look, hand on chin, pondering solutions). The iconic image of doctors and the indoctrination by the 'science of medicine' runs very deep!
Why do people revere the NHS so much?
Even William Beveridge (the alleged architect of the NHS, who had connections to eugenics and was most definitely 'in the club'), in his third and final report pretty much admitted that they'd got it horribly terribly wrong.
Of course, he knew that it was going exactly as 'they' had planned - that it was too impersonal, and had become a conveyor belt for faceless, nameless 'customers', entirely dependent on 'gifts' from the daddy state, whose entire wealth is taken from them in the first place (and obviously, the notion that the NHS is somehow 'free' and 'benevolent' is more absurd now than it's ever been).
Yes, they might be generally good at accident and emergency type stuff (cuts, breakages and burns etc. - if you can get someone to see you!), but other than that the NHS has no real understanding of (or even interest in) the true nature of disease whatsoever, as it is nothing more than a 100% lackey for the pharmaceuticals, who ruthlessly demonise and stifle anything and everything that goes against their holy allopathic dogmas (which only dangerous heretics dare question!).
Unfortunately, very few people are aware of Beveridge's final report (which I think was 1949?), but even though key 'failings' were 'admitted', by that time the monster had well and truly been unleashed, and was well on course to becoming the stifling murderous monopoly it was always intended to be (despite the ongoing 'shop front').
Sadly, there are millions who literally 'worship' their dearly beloved NHS, many of whom are in utter despair because it's 'lost its way'.
But it's done no such thing, as it (and the 'welfare state' in general) was always intended to be used to control the masses by massively narrowing their options (and knowledge, which can only come from state approved 'experts'), and making them almost entirely dependent on a system that can be dismantled at will by the 'overlords', not least to give them the 'excuse' to 'build back better'.
And of course, by the time the 'gifts' they've been conditioned to be so thoroughly grateful for have been ruthlessly taken away from them, the clueless will literally be begging their masters to enforce almost any 'solution' to this oh-so unanticipated 'problem'.
Cue full-on social credit system...🦸 (all for 'the greater good', no less...✊).
Eustace Mullins has documented the links between the earliest days of the American Medical system and drugs. This type of medicine is concerned with symptoms never prevention.
The last time I was unfortunate enough to see a "doctor" was about five years ago, and the only reason I went was to arrange an x-ray for a bad back that was being treated by a chiropractor (I can't remember exactly what happened, but I ended up paying for it myself).
Anyway, the doctor said he'd make the referral, and then wrote out a prescription...
"Here you go", he said, "these will help".
"What's that for?"
"Just some anti-depressants - they'll help you sleep better".
"But I'm not having trouble sleeping."
"But I thought you were in pain - these will help."
"I'm having a bit of pain, yes, but it's not effecting my sleep."
"But these will help you to feel better - the pain must be getting you down."
"No, not at all - I just need a little work doing on my back."
"Oh, ok." (Holds out the prescription.) "Take these anyway, they'll definitely help."
"I don't want your pills, and I'm shocked that you're pushing them on me in this way."
"Oh, ok. Is there anything else I can help you with?"
I think you get the picture. And honestly, it was like talking to a robot - no personality - dead behind the eyes - just a shell of a human being, churning out shit for his masters, whilst being extremely well rewarded financially and socially (the way people put these clowns on pedestals is truly sickening).
What kickbacks was he getting from this?
What incentives for being nothing more than a glorified drug pusher?
I knew somebody once who was a secretary at a hospital. She told me how "glamorous" female representatives of pharmaceutical companies would turn up in high-heels and short-skirts, and would literally wine and dine the doctors, who would then go on to prescribe their drugs at an alarming rate.
And that's how it works - as most doctors are just clueless, mindless, careerists, who almost certainly went to medical school for no other reason than to get a well-paid, well-respected, job - one that also grants them high-status in a society dumbed down enough to see the gatekeeper professions (teacher, police officer, soldier, teacher, doctor etc.) as "respectable", when they are anything but to those who have come to the full realisation of who and what they're actually "protecting".
I remember going to see a doctor over 20 years ago (Dr Chakrabharti - I'll never forget his name). He was about to retire and didn't prescribe anything. He simply said, "I've been a doctor all my working life, and all I can say is that I'm thoroughly ashamed of my profession. Please stay away from doctors, and always look into the so-called 'alternatives'. And I'm not saying they're all perfect, but so-called 'doctors' only know what we've been taught by the pharmaceuticals, which is wrong and dangerous on so many levels, and I have to live with what I've been part of for the rest of my days."
It's a pity that he came to that conclusion at such a late stage. But how many doctors never admit that to themselves?
And how many people just take what they prescribe without question - because they've been conditioned to "trust the experts"?
How many are hopelessly addicted to dangerous, harmful drugs, whilst actually believe that they are taking them for the good of their health?
Twenty years ago, I worked in supported accommodation for adults with learning disabilities. Several staff noticed that the residents were given an unusually high amount of tablets, several times a day. We didn't get permission from the managers, but some of us decided to look into what they were taking, and why. Upon close scrutiny, we discovered that each and every one of them was on at least one repeat prescription for drugs that were prescribed YEARS ago for things that were no longer relevant (if they ever were in the first place?!). I don't remember all the details, but I do recall one chap being on extremely strong pain killers to help him with the pain from a minor operation he'd had TWENTY YEARS previously. And he was still being given them three times a day, EVERY day.
And trust me, we had to fight to get this stopped, as the local - "authority" managers insisted that this wasn't our remit, because we weren't "medically trained" (see comments re the Montgomery Ruling). They even tried to discipline us for looking into this in the first place, which was later over-ruled by a sympathetic senior manager.
And it's been many years since I worked there, but I'm absolutely certain that each and every one of those residents will now be multiple-jabbed and lined up for their boosters, just like the residents of older people's homes and the staff who continue to work there.
And why?
"Doctors orders."
Yes it’s very odd that Mr Utley’s personal health observations passes quality control at the Daily Mail. Perhaps the dénouement will be that he will “pass away” suddenly and be a warning to us all not to dice with death. Much like the dire warnings now emanating from Jeremy Clarkson. Certainly the advice you have tendered (subject to the usual disclaimers ) is very sensible although if concerned over a health issue an alternative is to seek private advice which though expensive is more objective. David Cartland is also trying to establish a more independent source of advice as the Twitterati will know. Thanks for a considered article, again.
Well, once again supreme brain food from Miri AF, even if I missed the article from 1 year ago.
An aside.
As with other industrial processes, pharmaceutical companies use a network of organisations to explore potential ideas (typically Universities), PhD programmes to optimise such potions, independent companies to develop the potion including industrialisation which then feed into trials. Surprisingly for a science based system there is incredible level of group-think, bending of results and more. For example, the basic recipe often has huge errors, and when the prototype potion is made, basic process mistakes can be made. 'Spill' the potion and the temptation to literally or virtually 'scrape it off the lab floor' maybe too great. 'Time is money', and so on.
The whole system is a house of cards.
It is substantially less robust than almost anyone outside the sector could imagine.
Let's just say, the Covid-19 affair was not a surprise (random DNA or heavy metals, anyone?), nor was the group-think from the potion makers.
Bucket chemistry to solve problems which may not need such an approach.
Yes Miri, this article is also very interesting, and I agree....even if it cannot be generalized...I am telling you this as a cancer patient who recovered 17 years ago thanks to a colonoscopy and colon surgery.
Even though the operation went well, they advised me to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (therefore light)... although doubtful, I decided to have it so as not to tempt fate... I stopped it after a few treatments... I felt that it was really hurting me and I perceived it as dangerous for my life...despite the scandal and the disappointment of the treating doctors I'm still here :)
I really liked the part of your article on childhood vaccination and the intuition on the need to anticipate treatments to glorify their potential beneficial effects...At the end of November, with an association born in the "pandemic" era we organized the yet another conference and we will deal with childhood vaccination... some Italian regions are trying to inject the monoclonal therapy Nirsevimab into newborns before leaving the hospital... you know for the alleged Respiratory Syncytial Virus.... I will propose your intuition as a question to the experts...as always, excellent insight! Thank you!
p.s.: on this topic, go read the Japanese MELODY randomized double-blind study: the groups (vaccine-placebo) were followed for 511 days after the injection. No deaths occurred in the placebo group, while 5 deaths (0.25%) were reported in the Nirsevimab group.
Thank you, Carlo, a very interesting comment, and I'm very pleased to hear you are fully recovered.
Wow Miri...I agree wholeheartedly. I avoid doctors at all costs and have for years.
To anyone, I heartily recommend listening to Ron Piana (a really wonderful storyteller) who has done 2 interviews with Soft White Underbelly on Youtube.
First interview (2 months ago) called "Greed and the Pharmaceutical Industry" and the most recent (1 month ago) called "Curing Cancer (affordably)".
The busiest shop in my town is the pharmacy.
Normally I enjoy Miri's tests. Unfortunately I did not managed to finish reading this article, which is very long and at the same time very naive.
I am a breast radiologist. Has been working in this profession for more than 30 years.
Yes, there are cancers, which are harmless (grade 1 in 70 years old person); but the majority are life threatening and require treatment. The main treatment for breast cancer is surgery. Chemotherapy is used in a tiny minority of patients (mainly triple-negative cancers)
Mammography gives a very little dose of radiation (you get much more on a plane), at the same time it is a very good diagnostic tool.
The matter is very complex and require some knowledge and experience,
I'm sure this is complex and requires years of knowledge and experience but from MY experience, the breast cancer world is fraught with lies. Years and years and years of people donating to breast cancer research all over the world (who actually gets the millions of dollars donated because it certainly hasn't been cured, nor have the brutal remedies changed?). Happily, I can say they never got a dime from me.
You can't tell me that after decades that the only options are to flatten them in an excruciating way to find "something" or just simply chop them off or even, as you said, dose people with a sickening chemo "therapy". Oh, and if they can't find it through a mammogram, you'll be sent to ultrasound, where they are even more desperate to find "something" and I mean desperate. Thankfully, I woke up long ago to the invasive testing done on women and men and will never again.
Delusional. Hope you will never get the disease.
God bless.
yes...I agree....you can't generalise, but in the general context Miri's post has once again hit the mark, especially on childhood vaccination.
I absolutely agree about vaccinations, childhood or otherwise. I’m on the whole very against the ‘just in case’ type of medical approach.
I just don't have time to read all the comments above. I read Miri's article with interest and agree with some of it. I have quite often mentioned that my husband has multiple myeloma (diagnosed in Feb/March 2019) for which he has been treated ever since, currently with monoclonal antibody injections. Whatever you all say about the NHS, we are extremely grateful for what we have received. If my husband hadn't been diagnosed at a very early stage, he might have ended up like his brother-in-law's brother whose exact same cancer was only found at a very late stage and so he died with bones fracturing and splintering all over the place. Again, as I've said before, I met someone whose mother had refused any treatment for her multiple myeloma and she died in agony, with every movement resulting in splintering bones. Please remember that it's not always the right thing to ignore symptoms etc etc. My father died of prostate cancer (aged 89, so a good age) and was always on at younger men not to ignore the symptoms out of embarrassment. I do not think it is wise to write off the NHS completely or that kind of medicine. We had our regular appointment with our homeopath yesterday and he told us that it would have been impossible for my husband to have been treated by him as the support system simply isn't in place. It is wiser to balance the two alternative views (holistic and ordinary) side by side, using both where necessary. Is it really wise to tell people to ignore doctors altogether? I agree about things like statins and a lot of drugs, but there's a balance. I'm probably being a bit incoherent, but I get fed up having to repeat myself about all this, but also I'm time-pressured currently, so please forgive me! Balance, that's what I'd say is the main thing. Moderation in all things, as my mother used to say!
Thank you, IDNC! A great comment - and cheers! xx