30 Comments
User's avatar
Mary's avatar

Once again you have woven seemingly unrelated threads to create a tapestry of the dystopian future planned for us by the Controllers. It’s uncanny how your observations match my own, though I live on the other side of the Pond and am twice your age. Keep pulling back the veils hiding the truth of things. As I’m certain you realize, that’s what you came here to do. And you do it so very well.

Expand full comment
Adam's avatar

Great article Miri, as always a breath of fresh air and balance in these times. I always found the fear of COVID to be quite pathetic, and disabling, for most (perhaps excluding those approaching life expectancy, for whom fear of mild respiratory illnesses may be more appropriate).

And much the same, the fear of these grooming gangs (not to detract from the seriousness of the issue) will be used to cripple people. Rather than live in fear we should take action, move against the dominant tide of isolation and keep united - protect ourselves and our families. Why fear something you can easily prevent? Love your children. If you get married, mean it. Don’t be unfaithful. Be a protector … of yourself and all those around you.

Look at Netflix - it’s all drugs / alcohol / infidelity / divorce / suicide. Relationships, and society by extension, is being dismantled by this trash on our devices too.

All the same, I feel for those many victims of the grooming gangs, who for whatever reason did not enjoy the protection of a united family.

Expand full comment
Oiram Nivla's avatar

Community needs to band together to protect our children from these horrors.. Numbers of people showing the crooks, and the ruling class that people are prepared to stand up for what's right

Expand full comment
Susie AH's avatar

"Indoor human" is that a battery farmed human? It gets more like The Matrix everyday. I could live in fear, but I refuse to because what I actually see every day is safety and neighbourliness in my rural community.

Expand full comment
Priscilla's avatar

Excellent article, Miri. We can't live our lives in fear, we must go out and about and allow our children and pets to do the same. I remember a wonderful childhood of being allowed to roam freely round the countryside nearby with a gang of other children (well brought up, well behaved, generally, not the gangs you are talking about in relation to County Lines!!!) - we had such fun, crossing streams on logs, exploring empty houses and finding a priest's room, all sorts of exciting and illicit things! The thought of keeping cats indoors is horrifying - they are wild creatures and not meant to be cooped up inside. We have had quite a few cats, two of whom sadly disappeared, but this is the risk you take with allowing cats to roam as they will. It is very distressing to lose a cat in this way, but I think it is more distressing to see a cat effectively 'caged' indoors. I think you're right that the equivalent for boys of the grooming gangs for girls is the County Lines type of stuff - so they end up in prison, returning time and again because the police never let up on them for even very minor infringements of their release conditions. They haven't a chance - unless they have extremely supportive family. But it's difficult for the family, as these boys often have contacts and 'friends' who most wouldn't consider very suitable, especially if the family has younger children who they want to keep away from these contacts.

Expand full comment
Nigel Cockain's avatar

Yes, 'They' want everyone groomed to stay scared and trapped indoors, tethered to online apps so that we are 'contained' and 'under control' whilst being surveilled and monitored 24/7 in the digital realm. 'They' don't want us 'out there' and off-radar in the messy analogue uncensored real world, actually mixing with people offline, maybe even enjoying ourselves. 'They' want us penned-in, fearful, isolated, marooned in our home-made political prison pods. We all have to get out more and get busy wandering about! 'They' can stick their apps and their agendas where the sun don't shine, of course.

Expand full comment
Arraya's avatar

'Why this, why now'

The counter Jihad movement sprung up around 2006 which linked the US war on terror with European immigrations activists.

Tommy Robinson, who Elon endorsed, is paid by US based Zionist think tanks that work for the interest of Israel

Why does Israel want to bring this up now is the question

Expand full comment
Joanne Boddington's avatar

Please provide evidence for your claim about Robinson's funding.

Expand full comment
Arraya's avatar

Daniel Pipes paid is legal fees

As far as his connection US neo con think tanks (that drafted the Iraq war plans and likely did 9/11) thats easy to find

Robinson (not his real name) is an Israeli patriot

Expand full comment
Rosie's avatar

IMO, Tommy Robinson (Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) is a simple man who sold out.

I saw the video of him saying he'd fight for Israel and, honestly, it looked like product promotion - like the wife in "The Truman Show" but not as good. I don't think he cared about Israel at all, just about paying his legal bills.

It's easy to see how Israel will want to fund him (and the English Defence League - see Companies House record to see how it was formerly the English and Jewish Defence League https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/07678022

If people in Europe can be convinced that Muslims are bad people, it makes an attack by Israel on any of its neighbours something Europeans would support.

Personally, I suspect Musk is putting this stuff about because he's actually NOT a paedophile (because, not all billionaires are paedophiles!). And, if this all comes out and the people who are paedophiles are exposed, there's more territory for him.

“The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience.”

― Albert Camus

Expand full comment
Arraya's avatar

His publically stated devotion to Israel does seem a bit staged, now that you mention it. Though, he does say he is Jewish in other contexts.

I really fail to see how Elon is 'fighting pedophilia' here, of all places

This is not like the wests long history of cover ups in that area. There does not appear to be any commercial aspects to it. In fact, I would not really call it a cover up at all. Despite left wing media calling them racists and sort of denying it, periodically. There have been ongoing convictions for over a decade. That's not a cover up

Despite #metoo mentality, legal rape accusations rarely ever get convictions. In the US it's like 2-5% of offical, legal, rape allegations get convictions. That number has zero to do with guilt. About 25% of cases the prosecutors think they could win and the victims back out for a myriad of reasons. That is just the reality of sex crimes and 'innocent until proven guilty'

For lower income minors I suspect it's even worse. Without strong support pushing a legal process is very hard for victims. Police do not see sex crimes as presitgious work.

As gruesome as this phenomena is, I don't see any cover ups. Not like actual cover ups that I have studied in the past

Expand full comment
Rosie's avatar

I can see why you'd say it's not a cover-up, as in, it's not a co-ordinated effort to conceal. That said, if Gordon Brown really did tell police officers not to pursue these cases (and given how many articles from "fact checkers" say this is baseless, it makes me think he might have) why was that?

Given the way all communities work, from Masons to Morris Dancers, people are going to be more sympathetic to people they see as "their own" - their families, friends, friends of friends etc. If there is one group that is dominant on the council and the police and the grooming gangs, you can see how this could perpetuate. Certainly I don't think this is something that can be quickly and easily fixed.

I think we all know that no poor males from a council estate in London would get away doing this to girls from Chelsea. And that many people want to sexually exploit young girls and boys with impunity. If their religion has told them people outside their religion are morally inferior (and a lot of religions do that) it's easy to see how these factors would come together to lead to race-targeted sexual exploitation.

I do think, though, that Elon probably isn't a paedophile (I mean, if he is, he's soon going to be toast!) and this is just a topic he's picked to try and destroy Labour and get the Reform puppets in.

Expand full comment
Arraya's avatar

, it makes me think he might have) why was that?"

People don't do something like that unless they are forced to. That is if the penalty for it being exposed is worse than not.

While they have fallen off my radar in recent years, I've been following the 'war on terror' crew behind Robinson him for a long time.

I would not be surprised if there was grooming gang trainers puppeted by the same cabal that is 'exposing' it

That's just how they roll

-----------------------------

That is more a a war crime type of thing. It's a domination type thing. Ethic gangs waring with the dominate ethnic group.

Gang rapes are relatively common in millitary settings with occupying forces

Black Panther leader Eldridge Cleaver raped white women as an expression of revolution and revenge, back in the 70s

Maria Farmer (A victim of Epstien)

"For a long time I had a hard time with all Jewish people, I’m gonna be honest with you. For a long time I was like, I think it’s all the Jews. Like I don’t know, because my sister is like, ‘Maria, it’s just the ones you met, it’s these people.’ It’s just unfortunate that all the Jewish people I met also happen to be pedophiles that run the world economy, you know

“When I called Ghislaine [Maxwell] and asked why I couldn’t eat there [at a private and exclusive country club] she said, ‘It’s a Jewish country club, you’re not Jewish, they’re not going to serve you.’ This is how this woman spoke to me, yeah. This is how these people think, Whitney. They, honest to God, think their DNA is better than everybody else’s, I swear to you. It was a theme all the time with them. With Eileen Guggenheim, with Jeffrey Epstein, with Ghislaine. It was a theme.

Anybody who was not Jewish, and you should write about this, but the way they spoke about them, it was really horrifying and it showed me a great deal about how these people truly believe that they are chosen to do something here. I don’t know, it’s unbelievable to me. I mean, and it was every one of them, the way they spoke."

----------------------------

Then you have the Soviet rape fest when they occupied Germany after WWII. Almost 250K women were raped to death with numbers of rapes ranging over 2 million . Ages were small children to octogenarians

The Soviets were whipped into a frenzy

Expand full comment
Rosie's avatar

I've just listened to this: https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/288-raja-miah-pakistani-grooming-gangs-in-england/id1687952188?i=1000685097409

I think it's more of a cover-up than I'd previously appreciated.

Expand full comment
Arraya's avatar

One of the key founders of the European counterjihad movement, Christine Brim, is Senior Vice President for Policy and Program Management at the US neoconservative thinktank, the Center for Security Policy (CSP).[37] The head of the CSP, Frank Gaffney, is on the board of advisors of the International Free Press Society as is fellow neoconservative Daniel Pipes.[38] Prominent Counterjihad blogger Paul Belien was appointed director of the Islamist Watch project by Pipes' Middle East Forum in December 2006.[39]

https://powerbase.info/index.php/Counterjihad_movement#Neoconservatives

Tommy (Not his real name) is supported by a network of mostly US funded neocon think tanks. Neocon = Lukid party. ommy identifies as Jewish and literally saidf he would die for Israel on video

His mentor Daniel Pipes was instrumental in driving the US into the iraq war.

Between September 11, 2001 and September 11, 2002, Daniel Pipes became one of the main American commentators focused on terrorism and Islam. during that period he appeared in 110 television shows and 450 radio programs. His editorials have been welcomed by the Wall Street Journal and Los Angeles Times, whereas the New York Post has included him among its journalists.

Daniel Pipes was interestingly enough, Rudolph Gulliani's campaign manager when he ran for preisdent. Gulliani covered up a bunch of Pedo rings in the 80s

Expand full comment
Andrew Marsh's avatar

Well, that was interesting. Thank you Miri.

One angle is the inherent superiority and so justification for vile acts by a very small but highly active group of some communities, who see the world as it was in 700 AD.

The wider point - not letting a crisis go to waste - is evident from Westminster Wendy House, with lots of hot air every single day except for school holidays.

We live in dangerous times.

Our friends could be enemies and our enemies could be friendly. A true 'Alice in Wonderland' world.

Expand full comment
Deenzy's avatar

Not disagreeing with your social engineering thesis but I think another big factor of why this why now is the orchestrated hard pendulum swing to the right that you have also predicted. The rape gang outrage is clearly being whipped up to usher in Reform

Expand full comment
Hugh's avatar

I trust you did not allow the veterinarian to 'vaccinate' your cats ..

Expand full comment
Miri AF's avatar

Certainly not!

Expand full comment
Dmitri X's avatar

Your talent, Miri, to see reality thru the illusion is first class!

The Creator, the real Authority, has given us the whole world to live in.

The real Authority did not promise us safety for our lives but he’s given us all freedoms with only one Law to follow: Do no harm.

Fake authority offer us the contained artificial safe place to survive.

They have been trying to take freedoms away but to give us safety instead with legislations designed for “safety” and “greater good”.

Which authority to follow is the choice each one of the people has to make individually and follow the right choice fearlessly.

Thank you for your work, Miri.

Expand full comment
Critical Bill's avatar

I suspect that the prominence of grooming gang coverage, as with crimes by immigrants, is part of a drive to garner support for withdrawing from ECHR legislation.

Expand full comment
Rosie's avatar

Can you say more about that, please as I don't understand how it would help this and why anyone would want to do that. My understanding is that the Equality and Human Rights Commission is for England, Scotland and Wales and I don't think you are suggesting that England withdraws, so I am not clear what you are suggesting.

Having just read your Substack article on gold (HOW interesting!) I am sure you have a point, so would be keen to hear it.

Expand full comment
Critical Bill's avatar

Pure speculation on my part, but a recent case in the media highlighted a non-custodial sentence on the grounds of religious education (teaching that rape of whites was permisable). Also, as the volume rises on these cases, the clamour to deport criminal asians and migrants will be blocked by the exemptions in EHCR which include long-term residence, unduly harsh impact on children, to name a couple. My (totally unqualified) guess, is that these types of crimes are part of the toolkit required to get popular opinion to want us to withdraw from EHCR, but the motivation is to remove other rights such as bodily autonomy, freedom of movement etc. I also think the timeframe is set up for Queer Starmer’s successor, who can capitalise on Starmer’s unpopularity and the fact that he was an EHCR advocate, criminal defence lawyer on grounds of human rights and a protector of high profile rapists, to bring about the changes.

Expand full comment
Rosie's avatar

Interesting angle. I like it. I think the main answer might be ignoring these mental people who say they are our government and working out how to trade without them to cut off (or at least severely limit) their food/fuel supply!

Expand full comment
Critical Bill's avatar

Agreed - BTW, I may have mixed up my acronyms - I meant to refer to ECHR, European Convention on Human Rights, not the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

Expand full comment
Rosie's avatar

I think it's a very similar thing and good to know we are on the same page re how to deal with all of this - as soon as the innovative 10-20% of the population are on that page (i.e. self-employed people who are genuinely creating stuff) are all on that page, I think the whole thing crumbles.

Expand full comment
Dyledaman-vanizdayha's avatar

Thanks Miri...great piece.

Ties in very nicely with Alex's thoughts (Thinking coalition) on PsyOps strategies as well.

I think your point about the destruction of community is so valid. My home towns infrastructure is falling down around us...pot holes... consistent roadworks by unheard of private contractors...poor public transport... rubbish everywhere...run down and delapidated buildings and structures everywhere....yet when I drive throught the county's countryside, and neighbouring counties, new housing estates everywhere!

So why aren't our communities and infrastructures being revitalised?

So I'm making 2 points here:

1. The decaying towns and inner cities create a despondency where people want to stay at home and believe that the bogeyman walks the streets and what the media tells them rather than participating in a community experiential narrative. And this calling out 'where do our taxes go?'

2.Austerity is a non sense as evidenced by the construction of so many new houses. Although these are really just built as assets for the rich elites.

Expand full comment
Kevin Molloy's avatar

I'm sorry about your cat Miri. The main issue for me from this, is the gender of your vet! I was watching another video by Owen Benjamin, and he was being interviewed about life and how we are all being manipulated, but he made the controversial point that women are more easy to manipulate than men. 'A guy will slowly think 'this.. is ..wrong'. but a woman will go '... but Tina and Britney think it's ok....'. Very funny, but with women genetically programmed to be more risk averse as they are caring for new borns, I think it's easier to make them anxious. And easier for bad actors to tap into this. when you add in that women are more likely to bow to group interests, together with the infjux of women into the workplace over the last forty years you can see how this fear porn has suddenly taken root.

Expand full comment