So, the other day, I did the familiar modern decided-to-watch-a-film dance - scrolling through endless offerings, overwhelmed by infinite choice, trying to avoid anything about serial killers or missing children, which seems to account for around 97.8% of all Netflix fare - and finally settled on a film called ‘
Oh I have found Mr Coben to be extremely watchable. But I find I forget each of his pieces the moment it ends. I have probably seen Runaway. I saw the one with Joanna Lumley (Fool me Once - what an apt title!) and there was one with the Dexter guy and a dodgy English accent.
I think HC is a kind of Netflix automatic pilot movie generator. He's like a good piss up. You enjoy yourself ...but can't recall any of it.
Cogent analysis. However, I don't think we should fall into the trap of calling the left 'liberal".
This is an Americanism which has been imported here, and is a false front. As one of the cabal said "Americans will never except Communism, but will accept all its ideas under the guise of liberalism. ' I am a liberal - I believe in complete freedom of thought and speech. The word is from the Latin liber - liberty. The left has always been coercive and authoritarian the opposite of liberal. Increasingly it is violently coercive and authoritarian, demanding complete submission of thought and speech. Let's not fight the war of ideas using their terms.
Yes, good point. Modern "liberals" are not liberal at all, it's classic inversion. They only display any 'liberalism' around sexuality, but this is how it is with authoritarian regimes - sexual freedoms increase when political freedoms decrease.
I'm not judging (seriously), but not so long ago you were in a pecuniary straight and raising money for a new laptop? Netflix subscription? Seriously? Netflix is streamed pants - ditch it. Save some pennies. For way less than a monthly subscription to Netflix - I get second hand bargain books from various charity shops that are way better entertainment value. Ditto bloody Sky. Sky Arts is Freeview and the best bit by far. I used to work with Sky. A senior director once breezed into a meeting I'd pulled together when I worked in the tech business - and announced: "I assume you all have Sky right? If you don't - you're a fucking idiot". I kid you all not. That was 2006. In twenty years - I've never gone near it and never will. I figured any 'service' staffed by such arrogant arseholes isn't worth buying.
In terms of it being mainly depressing, binge-watch doom-crap on Notflix, you aren't the first to point this out - and I dare say you will not be the last.
They survive because people are scared to let it go. Don't be. Starve the fuckers of funds.
Thanks Richard, I know you don't mean this maliciously, but an important part of my work is to analyse dominant social and cultural propaganda. This is not disseminated via old books in charity shops, but by major, current mind-control weapons like Netflix. I can't comment on it if I don't see it. Netflix costs £6 a month, less than a single best-selling book, and when I comment on high-profile books I've read (which I do), nobody suggests I shouldn't buy them. There is (no offence implied) a snobbery about screen-based entertainment, that it's by definition not worth watching and self-indulgent, and we shouldn't purchase it, but buying books is seen as wonderful and virtuous, even if they cost a lot more, and are more instrumental in brainwashing - I've written about this - https://miriaf.co.uk/bookworm-or-brainworm/
To correct you, I didn't "fundraise for a laptop", I just told readers mine had broken unexpectedly (at less than a year old so I wasn't anticipating this) so article production would slow down until I had a new one. Readers who value what I do and wanted me to get back to normal service as soon as possible responded to this by choosing to help my acquire a new one quicker, which I appreciated greatly (as I made very clear at the time), but that was their choice - not a comment on how I spend my money. And it is my money, which I work very hard to earn. I'm not running a charity. I provide what people tell me is a valuable service, As you can see from the other comments on this article, people found my analysis of this high-profile Netflix offering helpful. Without Netflix, and without a laptop, I couldn't have provided it.
Hi Miri - I wasn’t trying to moralise (though I can understand it easily came across as such). Did occur to me you need to be in the mainstream to understand the mainstream - so apologies. I’m just sick to death of EVERY drama outlet making the same shitty content. It really is malignant and terminal. Olivia Coleman & crew on everything & it’s all dark & depressing. When I was young (probably too young) I watched Sean Connery & Ian Bannen in ‘The Offence’. Brilliant film - but not the central theme of every damn piece of ‘entertainment’. Add in Lynda La Plante & every crime in humanity the fault of white middle class men and you’ve the permanent recipe for steering audiences into believing life is like a permanent Morrissey record with a stuck needle.
I’m afraid I’ll stick with my charity shop books. A tenner’s worth kept me entertained & uplifted most of December & January and I’ve managed to recycle 30% of them off to friends!
I will stand by one observation though. There are a LOT of people who WANT to leave Netflix but WON’T leave it. That’s what they rely on. Junkies. They’re worse than Philip Morris or Coca Cola.
“In his own words” is one of only a tiny handful of books I’ve ever bought penned by a ‘pop’ star. Having actually also just read Johnny Marr’s mind (a fantastic charity shop bargain now in the hands of an old mate of mine who actually plays a guitar in a band) - there were many sides to Morrissey (as indeed there are to everyone).
It’s good to recognise intelligence - and diligence - and support.
It’s healthy to ask questions of everything & everyone as part of checking in on the bigger picture sometimes.
The fact that much of the above hasn’t happened in recent decades explains so much of where we all are today.
We hear a lot from those claiming that the Lucy Connolly story is an insignificant "side show", and anyone who believes otherwise needs to "big up and focus on more important things"?
But what's "more important"? What's the "main show", and are MSN driven "side shows" inextricably part of it?
Farage will rescue us. Haha. He made his money in finance which is a huge red flag. I think he has been groomed for his upcoming role for many years, everything is planned. I have always thought his plane crash in 2010 and the later suicide of the pilot very fishy, Would the party leader really spend election day as passenger in a banner plane? Just found this:
I need to bookmark this article before I go and watch this film. Your articles always ground me and force me to start again from scratch. Thank you. I don’t always agree with everything you say, but that’s a good thing right? ❤️
All very credible and plausible. However, I am wondering if 'Reform' are on a small decline? The BBBarister thinks that Mr Starmer is attempting to stay in power and use constitutional powers (as in wartime) to do so. Failing that might a coalition also be a possibility?
Nonetheless we are being propagandised by all and sundry.
Off topic perhaps but here's one for ya, Miri. I only just heard about something called a "deadbot" which is a software package set to imitate a departed loved one. I mentioned this to a friend and she said this idea had been used in Black Mirror. Which is why it seemed familiar to me (as well as being barkingly insane). I know you've mentioned BM a lot as an example of predictive programming. BM might be worth a whole article to itself.
That's right, it was in a Black Mirror episode - 'Be Right Back'. Yes, I have commented on Black Mirror quite a few times, such as in this article: https://miriaf.co.uk/bonfire-of-the-vanities/
But you're quite correct, the series probably deserves a whole article - or indeed a series of them - to itself!
Miri, Just like one of your commenters: Richard’s Substack (The Great Clean Up) - I also dumped Netflix a few years ago, because of its constant propagandising barrage of wokeness; over-the-top violence; inappropriate graphic sex (no, I’m no prude); the ubiquitous trans-pushing and a whole armoury of other social engineering sorcery.
However, after reading your analysis, I splashed out £3:45 to watch it on YouTube (nay Netflix) to see it for myself. I understand your point in the comments about you paying the monthly Netflix subscription fee - to keep up with Their latest propaganda: how else can you warn the one’s that are inadvertently caught under the Netflix’s powerful Bernaysian spell?
Apart from the propaganda assault and possible predictive programming pieces you rightly detailed, here’s a few of my propaganda take-aways from the film:
- Unvetted (free speech) books – with their ‘dangerous’ message – can, if not kept in check, eventually lead to state-controlled storm troopers shooting or jailing whomever they deem/label seditious ‘terrorists’; Oh, what are the ICE storm troopers in the USA doing today?
- Children always crying in the film (‘just a bloody nuisance, aren’t they?’) and a pregnant female deciding she doesn’t want her unborn child to come into this chaotic world
[Another persuasive tentacle of the current de-pop agenda]
- The young would-be scientist character Birdie invited by the evil Liz to study virology at a prestigious research lab. ‘They’ ALWAYS have to keep the ‘deadly virus’ concept in people’s minds. Last Bond film for example! Do they plan a renamed Convid MkII? They’ll try!
- Dividing people into two opposing camps: the ‘changers’ and the ‘non-changers’. Hmm.. anti-vaxxers ring a bell?
THE most powerful weapon in the Netflix propaganda armoury – especially in this film – is emotion. They are well-practiced at using that VERY effective propaganda tool.
Thanks Michael, very astute observations. All very true. Another thing I picked up on was Liz having identical twin boys, who were always dressed the same, and in a rather old-fashioned way, as if to symbolise the conservative movement merely produces unoriginal carbon copies of staid patriarchy, not unique and diverse individuals. Others have noted the "25th" anniversary in the film, to mirror the USA's upcoming "250th", which seems intentional (given Paul and Ellen's older children were clearly over 25, it seems strange the parents weren't celebrating a 30th anniversary).
And yes, all propaganda always works on emotion, principally fear of "the other".
Always on poin Miri. It must be nearly universal for us "non-TV watchers" and devourers of Netflix alike - scrolling through the offerings in search of something to watch.
"They can submerge us in highly sophisticated propaganda posing as ‘entertainment’, as they do with streaming services like Netflix (co-founded by masters of mental manipulation, the Freud-Bernays dynasty). They can deluge us with wall-to-wall fear mongering with 24-hour news services."
On the rare occasion I try to give Netfxxk another go, I spend most of my alotted TV gazing time, trying to find something that is not going to subtly propagandise me.
Those damned "subversive social sorcerers" (love that allit), are just so effective.
The MO you have described is excellently presented. So obvious when pointed out. Propagandists have been at this for so long, they have perfected their craft. One can't afford to become complacent and so thank you again for presenting us with such clarity. As I've said in previous comments, it's too easy to be lazy and be mesmerised by their propaganda. The fact that it is compartmentalised doesn't help.
Thank you, Scamitis. Although Netflix is of course a weapon of war, if we know how to watch it can be an invaluable defence. It helps us to know the enemy, and as The Art of War (approx. 5th century BC) told us "If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles".
I thought Reform when I got to this part "seemingly “moderate” populist right-wing faction sweeps to power, and then, when they have that power, reveal themselves as extremist tyrannical authoritarians who ruthlessly penalise any dissent"
Anyway Reform is now a shoo-in after Tice kissed the Wailing wall and Farage signed up to Friends of Israel.
I re-watched Jordan Peele’s “Us” this weekend (I was asleep first time around). It's violent but oh boy I think there are some truths there. A identical souless of copy of every human created underground, “tethered” to the humans above. I know that they HAVE to tell us and I feel it in my bones that something here is true. Can I go back to sleep please? Ha!
Thanks for the analysis, which makes a lot of sense
Though I do wonder what the chances are of Reform winning a landslide when their mid-term polling average is below 30% and apparently heading downwards:
I find it hard to see how the defection of the likes of Nadhim Zahawi (co-founder of YouGov as I guess most people here probably know) is going to help
Re television programmes, I have from time to time wondered about the high profile and popularity of “The Traitors”
I think a lot rests on the result of the Gorton and Denton by-election (predicted by the eerily revelatory 'Years and Years', where a Manchester by-election in 2026 is won by a populist right-wing candidate, leading to a General Election, and the populist right-wing candidate becoming Prime Minister!). Interestingly, the date of this election is July 4th, the same day as the 250th anniversary of America's birth, and which the film 'Anniversary' seems to be mirroring in some way (250th / 25th) - see reply to Michael above.
Agreed. I will watch developments with interest. And yes, I had noted the 250 year anniversary, not least in the context of Sir John Glubb's "The Fate of Empires".
As to Imagine, I recently stumbled (again) across this extraordinary covid cover version by Francis Collins(!):
TPTB do love to make pretty patterns with numbers don't they? What's that all about? It goes way beyond dropping the odd 33 hoax code or 22 master builder number doesn't it? I listened to a Crrow777radio podcast (excellent content!folks) with gematria expert Zachary Hubbard. Wow!! The number webs woven through all psyops is quite spectacular. Can only be done with AI one must assume.
“…trying to avoid anything about serial killers or missing children, which seems to account for around 97.8% of all Netflix fare …”
And the other 2.2% are Harlan Coben.
Ha, true - ! (Though the recent 'Run Away' was quite good...)
Oh I have found Mr Coben to be extremely watchable. But I find I forget each of his pieces the moment it ends. I have probably seen Runaway. I saw the one with Joanna Lumley (Fool me Once - what an apt title!) and there was one with the Dexter guy and a dodgy English accent.
I think HC is a kind of Netflix automatic pilot movie generator. He's like a good piss up. You enjoy yourself ...but can't recall any of it.
I'm tempted to watch this just to get to the scene where the lesbian comic goes missing.
Pity it isn't Jo Brand who goes missing.
Cogent analysis. However, I don't think we should fall into the trap of calling the left 'liberal".
This is an Americanism which has been imported here, and is a false front. As one of the cabal said "Americans will never except Communism, but will accept all its ideas under the guise of liberalism. ' I am a liberal - I believe in complete freedom of thought and speech. The word is from the Latin liber - liberty. The left has always been coercive and authoritarian the opposite of liberal. Increasingly it is violently coercive and authoritarian, demanding complete submission of thought and speech. Let's not fight the war of ideas using their terms.
Yes, good point. Modern "liberals" are not liberal at all, it's classic inversion. They only display any 'liberalism' around sexuality, but this is how it is with authoritarian regimes - sexual freedoms increase when political freedoms decrease.
I'm not judging (seriously), but not so long ago you were in a pecuniary straight and raising money for a new laptop? Netflix subscription? Seriously? Netflix is streamed pants - ditch it. Save some pennies. For way less than a monthly subscription to Netflix - I get second hand bargain books from various charity shops that are way better entertainment value. Ditto bloody Sky. Sky Arts is Freeview and the best bit by far. I used to work with Sky. A senior director once breezed into a meeting I'd pulled together when I worked in the tech business - and announced: "I assume you all have Sky right? If you don't - you're a fucking idiot". I kid you all not. That was 2006. In twenty years - I've never gone near it and never will. I figured any 'service' staffed by such arrogant arseholes isn't worth buying.
In terms of it being mainly depressing, binge-watch doom-crap on Notflix, you aren't the first to point this out - and I dare say you will not be the last.
They survive because people are scared to let it go. Don't be. Starve the fuckers of funds.
Best way - honest..
Thanks Richard, I know you don't mean this maliciously, but an important part of my work is to analyse dominant social and cultural propaganda. This is not disseminated via old books in charity shops, but by major, current mind-control weapons like Netflix. I can't comment on it if I don't see it. Netflix costs £6 a month, less than a single best-selling book, and when I comment on high-profile books I've read (which I do), nobody suggests I shouldn't buy them. There is (no offence implied) a snobbery about screen-based entertainment, that it's by definition not worth watching and self-indulgent, and we shouldn't purchase it, but buying books is seen as wonderful and virtuous, even if they cost a lot more, and are more instrumental in brainwashing - I've written about this - https://miriaf.co.uk/bookworm-or-brainworm/
To correct you, I didn't "fundraise for a laptop", I just told readers mine had broken unexpectedly (at less than a year old so I wasn't anticipating this) so article production would slow down until I had a new one. Readers who value what I do and wanted me to get back to normal service as soon as possible responded to this by choosing to help my acquire a new one quicker, which I appreciated greatly (as I made very clear at the time), but that was their choice - not a comment on how I spend my money. And it is my money, which I work very hard to earn. I'm not running a charity. I provide what people tell me is a valuable service, As you can see from the other comments on this article, people found my analysis of this high-profile Netflix offering helpful. Without Netflix, and without a laptop, I couldn't have provided it.
Hi Miri - I wasn’t trying to moralise (though I can understand it easily came across as such). Did occur to me you need to be in the mainstream to understand the mainstream - so apologies. I’m just sick to death of EVERY drama outlet making the same shitty content. It really is malignant and terminal. Olivia Coleman & crew on everything & it’s all dark & depressing. When I was young (probably too young) I watched Sean Connery & Ian Bannen in ‘The Offence’. Brilliant film - but not the central theme of every damn piece of ‘entertainment’. Add in Lynda La Plante & every crime in humanity the fault of white middle class men and you’ve the permanent recipe for steering audiences into believing life is like a permanent Morrissey record with a stuck needle.
I’m afraid I’ll stick with my charity shop books. A tenner’s worth kept me entertained & uplifted most of December & January and I’ve managed to recycle 30% of them off to friends!
I will stand by one observation though. There are a LOT of people who WANT to leave Netflix but WON’T leave it. That’s what they rely on. Junkies. They’re worse than Philip Morris or Coca Cola.
I wouldn't be too harsh on Morrisey!😊
Here's a verse from his brilliant "This World is Full of Crashing Bores...
"What really lies, beyond the constraints of my mind?
Could it be the sea, with fate mooning back at me?
No, it's just more lock-jawed pop-stars, thicker than pig-shit
Nothing to convey...
They're so scared to show intelligence
It might smear their lovely career"...
And, as I'm sure you'll agree, Miri is about as far as it gets from being "scared to show intelligence"...
😊😉
From Morrissey's "Spent the Day in Bed" (2017):
Stop watching the news
Because the news contrives to frighten you
To make you feel small and alone
To make you feel that your mind isn’t your own
“In his own words” is one of only a tiny handful of books I’ve ever bought penned by a ‘pop’ star. Having actually also just read Johnny Marr’s mind (a fantastic charity shop bargain now in the hands of an old mate of mine who actually plays a guitar in a band) - there were many sides to Morrissey (as indeed there are to everyone).
It’s good to recognise intelligence - and diligence - and support.
It’s healthy to ask questions of everything & everyone as part of checking in on the bigger picture sometimes.
The fact that much of the above hasn’t happened in recent decades explains so much of where we all are today.
We hear a lot from those claiming that the Lucy Connolly story is an insignificant "side show", and anyone who believes otherwise needs to "big up and focus on more important things"?
But what's "more important"? What's the "main show", and are MSN driven "side shows" inextricably part of it?
(Thanks for so clearly addressing the above!)
Farage will rescue us. Haha. He made his money in finance which is a huge red flag. I think he has been groomed for his upcoming role for many years, everything is planned. I have always thought his plane crash in 2010 and the later suicide of the pilot very fishy, Would the party leader really spend election day as passenger in a banner plane? Just found this:
https://medium.com/@levellerstjude08/nigel-farage-the-luckiest-man-alive-b390a8ecaf9d
In 2013 as a result of his injuries he underwent neck surgery to replace 2 discs, he later said this in an interview with The Telegraph:
"What continues to amaze me is that they cut through the side of my throat to access the area affected, and to this day there is no scar."
No scar! Really!
I need to bookmark this article before I go and watch this film. Your articles always ground me and force me to start again from scratch. Thank you. I don’t always agree with everything you say, but that’s a good thing right? ❤️
Thank you! And yes, life would be boring if we all agreed, heaven knows when I read old perspectives of mine, I don't even always agree with myself...
All very credible and plausible. However, I am wondering if 'Reform' are on a small decline? The BBBarister thinks that Mr Starmer is attempting to stay in power and use constitutional powers (as in wartime) to do so. Failing that might a coalition also be a possibility?
Nonetheless we are being propagandised by all and sundry.
Off topic perhaps but here's one for ya, Miri. I only just heard about something called a "deadbot" which is a software package set to imitate a departed loved one. I mentioned this to a friend and she said this idea had been used in Black Mirror. Which is why it seemed familiar to me (as well as being barkingly insane). I know you've mentioned BM a lot as an example of predictive programming. BM might be worth a whole article to itself.
That's right, it was in a Black Mirror episode - 'Be Right Back'. Yes, I have commented on Black Mirror quite a few times, such as in this article: https://miriaf.co.uk/bonfire-of-the-vanities/
But you're quite correct, the series probably deserves a whole article - or indeed a series of them - to itself!
Miri, Just like one of your commenters: Richard’s Substack (The Great Clean Up) - I also dumped Netflix a few years ago, because of its constant propagandising barrage of wokeness; over-the-top violence; inappropriate graphic sex (no, I’m no prude); the ubiquitous trans-pushing and a whole armoury of other social engineering sorcery.
However, after reading your analysis, I splashed out £3:45 to watch it on YouTube (nay Netflix) to see it for myself. I understand your point in the comments about you paying the monthly Netflix subscription fee - to keep up with Their latest propaganda: how else can you warn the one’s that are inadvertently caught under the Netflix’s powerful Bernaysian spell?
Apart from the propaganda assault and possible predictive programming pieces you rightly detailed, here’s a few of my propaganda take-aways from the film:
- Unvetted (free speech) books – with their ‘dangerous’ message – can, if not kept in check, eventually lead to state-controlled storm troopers shooting or jailing whomever they deem/label seditious ‘terrorists’; Oh, what are the ICE storm troopers in the USA doing today?
- Children always crying in the film (‘just a bloody nuisance, aren’t they?’) and a pregnant female deciding she doesn’t want her unborn child to come into this chaotic world
[Another persuasive tentacle of the current de-pop agenda]
- The young would-be scientist character Birdie invited by the evil Liz to study virology at a prestigious research lab. ‘They’ ALWAYS have to keep the ‘deadly virus’ concept in people’s minds. Last Bond film for example! Do they plan a renamed Convid MkII? They’ll try!
- Dividing people into two opposing camps: the ‘changers’ and the ‘non-changers’. Hmm.. anti-vaxxers ring a bell?
THE most powerful weapon in the Netflix propaganda armoury – especially in this film – is emotion. They are well-practiced at using that VERY effective propaganda tool.
Thanks Michael, very astute observations. All very true. Another thing I picked up on was Liz having identical twin boys, who were always dressed the same, and in a rather old-fashioned way, as if to symbolise the conservative movement merely produces unoriginal carbon copies of staid patriarchy, not unique and diverse individuals. Others have noted the "25th" anniversary in the film, to mirror the USA's upcoming "250th", which seems intentional (given Paul and Ellen's older children were clearly over 25, it seems strange the parents weren't celebrating a 30th anniversary).
And yes, all propaganda always works on emotion, principally fear of "the other".
Always on poin Miri. It must be nearly universal for us "non-TV watchers" and devourers of Netflix alike - scrolling through the offerings in search of something to watch.
"They can submerge us in highly sophisticated propaganda posing as ‘entertainment’, as they do with streaming services like Netflix (co-founded by masters of mental manipulation, the Freud-Bernays dynasty). They can deluge us with wall-to-wall fear mongering with 24-hour news services."
On the rare occasion I try to give Netfxxk another go, I spend most of my alotted TV gazing time, trying to find something that is not going to subtly propagandise me.
Those damned "subversive social sorcerers" (love that allit), are just so effective.
The MO you have described is excellently presented. So obvious when pointed out. Propagandists have been at this for so long, they have perfected their craft. One can't afford to become complacent and so thank you again for presenting us with such clarity. As I've said in previous comments, it's too easy to be lazy and be mesmerised by their propaganda. The fact that it is compartmentalised doesn't help.
Thank you, Scamitis. Although Netflix is of course a weapon of war, if we know how to watch it can be an invaluable defence. It helps us to know the enemy, and as The Art of War (approx. 5th century BC) told us "If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles".
Good point.
I watched that film on Sunday and thought this is where we are heading. Or this is where they want us
I thought Reform when I got to this part "seemingly “moderate” populist right-wing faction sweeps to power, and then, when they have that power, reveal themselves as extremist tyrannical authoritarians who ruthlessly penalise any dissent"
Anyway Reform is now a shoo-in after Tice kissed the Wailing wall and Farage signed up to Friends of Israel.
I re-watched Jordan Peele’s “Us” this weekend (I was asleep first time around). It's violent but oh boy I think there are some truths there. A identical souless of copy of every human created underground, “tethered” to the humans above. I know that they HAVE to tell us and I feel it in my bones that something here is true. Can I go back to sleep please? Ha!
Thanks for the analysis, which makes a lot of sense
Though I do wonder what the chances are of Reform winning a landslide when their mid-term polling average is below 30% and apparently heading downwards:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_United_Kingdom_general_election#Graphical_summary
I find it hard to see how the defection of the likes of Nadhim Zahawi (co-founder of YouGov as I guess most people here probably know) is going to help
Re television programmes, I have from time to time wondered about the high profile and popularity of “The Traitors”
I think a lot rests on the result of the Gorton and Denton by-election (predicted by the eerily revelatory 'Years and Years', where a Manchester by-election in 2026 is won by a populist right-wing candidate, leading to a General Election, and the populist right-wing candidate becoming Prime Minister!). Interestingly, the date of this election is July 4th, the same day as the 250th anniversary of America's birth, and which the film 'Anniversary' seems to be mirroring in some way (250th / 25th) - see reply to Michael above.
Agreed. I will watch developments with interest. And yes, I had noted the 250 year anniversary, not least in the context of Sir John Glubb's "The Fate of Empires".
As to Imagine, I recently stumbled (again) across this extraordinary covid cover version by Francis Collins(!):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmvwyuV7Uvk&t=6880s
TPTB do love to make pretty patterns with numbers don't they? What's that all about? It goes way beyond dropping the odd 33 hoax code or 22 master builder number doesn't it? I listened to a Crrow777radio podcast (excellent content!folks) with gematria expert Zachary Hubbard. Wow!! The number webs woven through all psyops is quite spectacular. Can only be done with AI one must assume.
We should all unite under the one flag, the rainbow flag. Adhere to the seven Noachian Laws and look to Pax Judaica for salvation.
Or something....