As I detailed in my last article, I like to try and keep on top of various prominent pieces of predictive programming (I watch it so you don't have to), as it reliably gives us a good deal of insight into what the social scriptwriters have planned next.
Thank you Miri, I do enjoy reading your posts but I’m glad I’m not on Twitter. If I were I would be jumping into the fray in support of you and I don’t enjoy confrontational drama anymore. I await further media attention on this subject with both amusement and trepidation because the government has already spoken of their concern about further riots. I feel relatively safe where I am but Huddersfield could easily be a tinderbox so be careful.
Thank you, Susie, and you are very wise to avoid Twitter! Many thanks for your concern, I think we're ok where we are - a couple of miles out of the town centre - but we also have escape plans if needs be!
Just other places we can be if it all kicks off in Huddersfield! Which admittedly is possible as they plan to move 700 single male "asylum seekers" in to the massive abandoned student complex down the road....https://miriaf.co.uk/invasion-of-the-flat-snatchers-2/
I live in a university City and we have too many monstrous blocks for student housing. Mostly occupied by foreign students who can pay the large fees and who are keeping some universities afloat. What happens when they stop coming? I think they will be occupied by the same people you might have on your doorstep plus the homeless, though the mix looks problematic. Moving for us is also difficult at our time of life!
I've come across the trolls, who resort to insults either on the first or second response. This tell-tale then sets the tone, with no debate, not recognition of anything from the writer, just a wall of abuse. The military types let themselves down by suggesting one is 'dismissed' - nobody talks like that outside of the services.
So - the usual disclaimer:
Dame M Dawes, a self-regarding 'intellect', who really should answer for building safety regulation failures while in her command (see Grenfell), and in her current Ofcom role has never, ever employed known activists (well, maybe). Up the 77th! 'Dismissed'!
Good on you Miri. I am one of many who admires your courage and persistence.
Those who ridicule are always frightened of the one they mock. Suggestion - ask them what they are frightened of, or perhaps just ignore them. They also fear lack of attention from their target of the day.
I commend you for keeping your head straight during such an onslaught because even if one realises the true nature of the onslaught, it still can grind on your psyche. Keep your head straight.
And thank you for weathering the shitstorm on Twitter to expose this Op to the rest of us.
Thank you, Johan, admittedly it has taken me quite a few years of trial and error to learn this skill! Not a pleasant experience as you say, but absolutely worth experiencing in this instance for what it has so irrefutably revealed.
" ... then follow it up with a load of silly comments and swearing, as if to suggest they're being sarcastic, but they're not, it's just hiding in plain sight."
Yes, my experience of confronting people about being agents has got the sarcasm treatment. I confronted someone in the anti-lockdown group, Stand in the Park, with saying things that didn't make sense in a video he put up on FB, however, I didn't accuse him of being agent. His response though was very narky and he said, "Do you think I work for ASIO?" after which he stalked off and made a phone call.
I had another experience with US alleged Veteran for Peace, Vince Emanuele, who came to speak in Sydney and whose every word I hung on back in 2013, however, when I reviewed the speech he gave which had been recorded I saw discrepancies and confronted him on Messenger.
Me: I swallowed it all back then but I don't swallow it now. If there's anything you can tell me to persuade me that you're not controlled opposition I'm all ears, otherwise I have no choice but to believe you are, do I?
Vince: You got me. I’ve been a trained CIA agent since childhood. My parents actually live in Virginia and work for the state department. My brother had been a deep state agent since 2000, before the Deep State brought down the Twin Towers. You’re the first and only person to figure it out. Who do you work for?
That's very interesting/revealing, thanks Petra. Yes, it is always most interesting and instructive to revisit old beloved books and films and see how they sit with us now. I've never read / seen The Beach, but I imagine it is chock full of "clues" given Alex Garland's extensive and intergenerational establishment connections.
I have seen and read "The Beach". I am not good at spotting the predictive messaging at all, but I can definitely tell you the film was worse than the book!
My understand of what it was saying was that the holy grail of travelling was to find a beautiful beach and a great supply of weed. I went travelling in 1997 and, while there was quite a bit of that going on, I don't think it was anyone I met's holy grail! Perhaps it was saying "oh, that's what travelling in the 90's was all about"? I really don't know. I am also not sure how relevant that message would be anyway, other than a potential way to tell people travelling isn't that valuable? And that, really, you are better off with Virtual Reality and some great weed? I suppose that makes sense?
I really have no memory of the book other than it was set on an island in Thailand and that I enjoyed it. I remember trying his next book and not liking it. Don't think I saw the film.
Also, I don't know anything about this Vince guy, but I wanted to have a quick check and watch a bit of him talking to see what my instincts were. I found a clip in a video of him talking where he seemed very controlled and contrived. That definitely put me off. Then I found another video and watched a part where he was talking about global warming and the issues with capitalism. Given soilders aren't really needed for most of our current wars (and certainly not a staged civil one) it doesn't really matter if you have someone like him behaving like that, so long as he remains "on message" with the big ones (capitalism and global warming) because those are what will be used to control people next.
I started listening to another talk ... and quickly stopped. Once you know someone's controlled opposition it's very hard to listen to them. Other people are good at it but I'm not.
you have Pearson, Doddsworth Hartley Brewer, all out there being extremely provocative a lot of the time. It's unusual to see women out there like this, with such aggression. I think they must be intelligence assets. Of long standing. Recruited in the same way Clark and the rest were. No doubt showing limited empathy on the testing, they get earmarked for a glittering career and are given every assistance. So this is what it looks like, State sponsored intimidation. It's interesting how the moment you popped up on Pearson's radar, it attracted this little gang.
It is not very nice reading these tweets, and I am sure it does 'grind you down'. But I think it reaches a plateau where you get used to it after a while and learn to move on swiftly. I think now you've spotted the MO you can do that, just block from now on a la Piers Morgan.
Thank you, Kevin, and that's a very pertinent observation. As soon as I came to the attention of Pearson, I was identified as "a problem" and targeted for being dealt with accordingly.
Yes, no normal women - and very few men - are capable of such sustained levels of aggression, especially using such crude language. it speaks of very particular kind of training. The MO is very similar to Gabriel and Sebastian Shemirani, who are also very clearly spooks, and do the whole "go right for the jugular" thing when dealing with targets.
It's unpleasant, but it's actually also encouraging. That they have to stoop this low shows they know they are not winning. People with the facts and the truth on their side simply do not have to behave like this.
On the topic of predictive programming I was recently arm wrestled into watching "Adolescence" and the opening was utterly ludicrous. Granted that we find out the police have video footage of the killing and know the boy is guilty and granted the desire for a dramatic opening, it nevertheless seems ridiculous that his arrest follows a military style attack on his house with a dozen or so police heavies. What were they worried about? That the boy might have been hiding a machine gun under his bed? The whole operation was gratuitous and counterproductive- unless of course it was all about sending an intimidating message to the public and suggesting that we are now in a police state.
I am thankfully not on social media, just email. Therefore, glad to avoid the odious types who infest that region. I concur that the 'Boss' you identify is at the back of all this and has a seeming multitude of acolytes. The astonishing thing is that some are well known and have a reputation for truth. I wonder how many are dupes and unaware of what is at play?
Alex Belfield who spent 33 months in “prison” for sending some emails! We are living in The Truman Show
Luce got 31 months plus 2 on remand....
Just spotted this! Another hidden in plain sight sign.
Thank you Miri, I do enjoy reading your posts but I’m glad I’m not on Twitter. If I were I would be jumping into the fray in support of you and I don’t enjoy confrontational drama anymore. I await further media attention on this subject with both amusement and trepidation because the government has already spoken of their concern about further riots. I feel relatively safe where I am but Huddersfield could easily be a tinderbox so be careful.
Thank you, Susie, and you are very wise to avoid Twitter! Many thanks for your concern, I think we're ok where we are - a couple of miles out of the town centre - but we also have escape plans if needs be!
Is it possible to elucidate on escape plans? Maybe a stupid request as needed to be kept secret.
Just other places we can be if it all kicks off in Huddersfield! Which admittedly is possible as they plan to move 700 single male "asylum seekers" in to the massive abandoned student complex down the road....https://miriaf.co.uk/invasion-of-the-flat-snatchers-2/
I live in a university City and we have too many monstrous blocks for student housing. Mostly occupied by foreign students who can pay the large fees and who are keeping some universities afloat. What happens when they stop coming? I think they will be occupied by the same people you might have on your doorstep plus the homeless, though the mix looks problematic. Moving for us is also difficult at our time of life!
Dear Miri,
Thank you for this.
I've come across the trolls, who resort to insults either on the first or second response. This tell-tale then sets the tone, with no debate, not recognition of anything from the writer, just a wall of abuse. The military types let themselves down by suggesting one is 'dismissed' - nobody talks like that outside of the services.
So - the usual disclaimer:
Dame M Dawes, a self-regarding 'intellect', who really should answer for building safety regulation failures while in her command (see Grenfell), and in her current Ofcom role has never, ever employed known activists (well, maybe). Up the 77th! 'Dismissed'!
Thank you Andrew, and this is an excellent and astute point - "nobody talks like that outside of the services". True.
Good on you Miri. I am one of many who admires your courage and persistence.
Those who ridicule are always frightened of the one they mock. Suggestion - ask them what they are frightened of, or perhaps just ignore them. They also fear lack of attention from their target of the day.
Thank you, Kika!
I commend you for keeping your head straight during such an onslaught because even if one realises the true nature of the onslaught, it still can grind on your psyche. Keep your head straight.
And thank you for weathering the shitstorm on Twitter to expose this Op to the rest of us.
Thank you, Johan, admittedly it has taken me quite a few years of trial and error to learn this skill! Not a pleasant experience as you say, but absolutely worth experiencing in this instance for what it has so irrefutably revealed.
Thank you for being such a brave warrior for the truth, Miri. I appreciate you so much.
Thank you, Steph, I very much appreciate your support.
" ... then follow it up with a load of silly comments and swearing, as if to suggest they're being sarcastic, but they're not, it's just hiding in plain sight."
Yes, my experience of confronting people about being agents has got the sarcasm treatment. I confronted someone in the anti-lockdown group, Stand in the Park, with saying things that didn't make sense in a video he put up on FB, however, I didn't accuse him of being agent. His response though was very narky and he said, "Do you think I work for ASIO?" after which he stalked off and made a phone call.
I had another experience with US alleged Veteran for Peace, Vince Emanuele, who came to speak in Sydney and whose every word I hung on back in 2013, however, when I reviewed the speech he gave which had been recorded I saw discrepancies and confronted him on Messenger.
Me: I swallowed it all back then but I don't swallow it now. If there's anything you can tell me to persuade me that you're not controlled opposition I'm all ears, otherwise I have no choice but to believe you are, do I?
Vince: You got me. I’ve been a trained CIA agent since childhood. My parents actually live in Virginia and work for the state department. My brother had been a deep state agent since 2000, before the Deep State brought down the Twin Towers. You’re the first and only person to figure it out. Who do you work for?
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/vince-emanuele-veteran-for-peace.html
I must say I loved Alex Garland's,The Beach, when I read it years ago. I wonder how it would speak to me now.
That's very interesting/revealing, thanks Petra. Yes, it is always most interesting and instructive to revisit old beloved books and films and see how they sit with us now. I've never read / seen The Beach, but I imagine it is chock full of "clues" given Alex Garland's extensive and intergenerational establishment connections.
I have seen and read "The Beach". I am not good at spotting the predictive messaging at all, but I can definitely tell you the film was worse than the book!
My understand of what it was saying was that the holy grail of travelling was to find a beautiful beach and a great supply of weed. I went travelling in 1997 and, while there was quite a bit of that going on, I don't think it was anyone I met's holy grail! Perhaps it was saying "oh, that's what travelling in the 90's was all about"? I really don't know. I am also not sure how relevant that message would be anyway, other than a potential way to tell people travelling isn't that valuable? And that, really, you are better off with Virtual Reality and some great weed? I suppose that makes sense?
I really have no memory of the book other than it was set on an island in Thailand and that I enjoyed it. I remember trying his next book and not liking it. Don't think I saw the film.
Also, I don't know anything about this Vince guy, but I wanted to have a quick check and watch a bit of him talking to see what my instincts were. I found a clip in a video of him talking where he seemed very controlled and contrived. That definitely put me off. Then I found another video and watched a part where he was talking about global warming and the issues with capitalism. Given soilders aren't really needed for most of our current wars (and certainly not a staged civil one) it doesn't really matter if you have someone like him behaving like that, so long as he remains "on message" with the big ones (capitalism and global warming) because those are what will be used to control people next.
I started listening to another talk ... and quickly stopped. Once you know someone's controlled opposition it's very hard to listen to them. Other people are good at it but I'm not.
you have Pearson, Doddsworth Hartley Brewer, all out there being extremely provocative a lot of the time. It's unusual to see women out there like this, with such aggression. I think they must be intelligence assets. Of long standing. Recruited in the same way Clark and the rest were. No doubt showing limited empathy on the testing, they get earmarked for a glittering career and are given every assistance. So this is what it looks like, State sponsored intimidation. It's interesting how the moment you popped up on Pearson's radar, it attracted this little gang.
It is not very nice reading these tweets, and I am sure it does 'grind you down'. But I think it reaches a plateau where you get used to it after a while and learn to move on swiftly. I think now you've spotted the MO you can do that, just block from now on a la Piers Morgan.
Thank you, Kevin, and that's a very pertinent observation. As soon as I came to the attention of Pearson, I was identified as "a problem" and targeted for being dealt with accordingly.
Yes, no normal women - and very few men - are capable of such sustained levels of aggression, especially using such crude language. it speaks of very particular kind of training. The MO is very similar to Gabriel and Sebastian Shemirani, who are also very clearly spooks, and do the whole "go right for the jugular" thing when dealing with targets.
It's unpleasant, but it's actually also encouraging. That they have to stoop this low shows they know they are not winning. People with the facts and the truth on their side simply do not have to behave like this.
On the topic of predictive programming I was recently arm wrestled into watching "Adolescence" and the opening was utterly ludicrous. Granted that we find out the police have video footage of the killing and know the boy is guilty and granted the desire for a dramatic opening, it nevertheless seems ridiculous that his arrest follows a military style attack on his house with a dozen or so police heavies. What were they worried about? That the boy might have been hiding a machine gun under his bed? The whole operation was gratuitous and counterproductive- unless of course it was all about sending an intimidating message to the public and suggesting that we are now in a police state.
I am thankfully not on social media, just email. Therefore, glad to avoid the odious types who infest that region. I concur that the 'Boss' you identify is at the back of all this and has a seeming multitude of acolytes. The astonishing thing is that some are well known and have a reputation for truth. I wonder how many are dupes and unaware of what is at play?
My mistake it was a cigarette lighter - http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/june/24/newsid_2519000/2519201.stm
Was that engraved on a coffee pot
No james. I believe its common knowledge.
Thank you very much, Farleyboy! Much appreciated.
Thank you, Monica, and yes absolutely re: Lucifer's Con - hiding in plain sight as always.
(She even spelled her name on Twitter "Lucie" which is a direct abbreviation...)