53 Comments
User's avatar
Petra Liverani's avatar

Brilliant, Miri. You've pulled all the threads together perfectly.

I've never seen a single episode of Family Ties but even if I'd been an avid viewer I probably wouldn't have registered any connection between Alex and Charlie.

Expand full comment
Miri AF's avatar

Many thanks, Petra! I don't know if I would have registered it either until I saw the shared detail about the parental architects, and just thought, "oh come on"... it's typical of one of their little nudges and in-jokes, because what are these characters after all if not social "architects"...

Expand full comment
Catherine Cooper's avatar

Thank you, Miri, impeccable research and joining of the dots, as usual!

Luckily I got to see the video analysis of the “shooting” you linked before it got pulled by YouTube. Are they getting lazier or are my eyes just more attuned to their theatrical trickery? Sooo obvs!

I’m a bit late to the party on this one; the first I heard about it was via your Substack email. Thank you again, because you watch the news so I don’t have to.

However, I’m shocked to see that Owen Benjamin has been hoodwinked. I replied to one of his Facebook posts using a lot of your logic and arguments (hope you don’t mind a bit of my stealing there, but I did give you full credit - describing you as “undeniably the best journalist in the UK”)!

Again, to anyone who’s ever encountered you….sooooo obvs!!!

Expand full comment
Miri AF's avatar

Many thanks Catherine, very kind!

I'm very surprised to hear that about OB, he has been excellent on many things, however, I was quite suspicious of him when he was effectively proclaiming to be a fundamentalist Muslim and trying to get his very non-Muslim wife into a hijab... so there may indeed be some question marks around him..!

Expand full comment
Mary Cox's avatar

I second "Miri - the best journalist in the UK" and also the mistrust in OB. There really are no heroes allowed to be in the public eye who are not controlled (exactly what level of exposure indicates controlled is what I'm grappling with as a baby truther).

Expand full comment
Catherine Cooper's avatar

Exactly! Despite OB's seemingly being kicked off all major platforms, he still manages to broadcast to a wide audience. In one of his more recent posts, he was calling for digital ID in order to use social media, citing the need for accountability. However, I see this as the thin end of a very big total censorship wedge.

Expand full comment
Mary Cox's avatar

Oh well there you go! Case closed. That's what he's been primed for, to convince the truthers that digital ID is not so bad. They REALLY do think we are stupid.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 12
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Catherine Cooper's avatar

I’ve really enjoyed OB’s film breakdowns and his many other spell breaking podcasts so far, but I’m rapidly losing faith in his judgment right now….

Expand full comment
kevin's avatar

The blanket media coverage in the UK where, I'd guess, fewer that one in a hundred thousand would have heard of Kirk raises a red psyop flag.

Meanwhile, His Britannic Majesty’s Ambassador to the United States of America at the time, Lord Mandelson, was too concerned about people talking about his love for “bestie” Jeffrey Epstein, and the photos he sent of himself topless and wearing a fluffy white dressing gown to comment!

Expand full comment
Miri AF's avatar

Thanks Kevin, and indeed, good point - I'd barely heard of the guy myself, and yet here we are with wall-to-wall press coverage, even in local newspapers.

As for Mandelson, well, quite - !

Expand full comment
Andrew Marsh's avatar

I did not know who Charlie Kirk was until the shooting.

Then came an avalanche of copy from lots of commentators, along the same themes - outrage, big change, things can't go on.

It is a matter for the USA. I don't see the translation of this to Europe.

I do see orchestrated MSM / political meddling.

Expand full comment
Miri AF's avatar

I hope you're right, Andrew, but unfortunately I do anticipate them "martyring" someone over here as well, someone of the Tommy Robinson variet,y though probably not him himself. Hopefully I'm wrong.

Expand full comment
Andrew Marsh's avatar

Dear Miri,

I think that's been the objective since the anniversary of the Starmer KC 'I am the law' broadcast in July 2024.

Yes, somebody is going to get hurt - hopefully not dead.

And yes, it will be scripted.

Expand full comment
Mary Cox's avatar

Good grief, sacrificing "our Tommeh"? Is that a possibility for today? Jumping the shark comes to mind but I forget how brainwashed most folk are.

Expand full comment
Johan's avatar

Oh just fabulous. I thought something was a bit off linking that girl in the train with the glamorous (🥁 🥁 Ukrainien?! Seriously?!?!) model and the Mathis report sorted that right out.

I saw a number of articles and when a generally reliable source quoted Konstantin Kissin on how this assassination is the pits and the start of the end, I was thinking I smell a rat.

You don’t disappoint, Miri. 🌟

Now I know they’re lying and it’s just another psyop to rally some sort of response from the masses but I just hope enough people realise in time it’s a psyop so the worst don’t actually happen (now that I have been preparing for said worst for the last 3 years!). 🤞

Expand full comment
Miri AF's avatar

Thank you Johan, and you are absolutely right. As for the book, an extraordinary indictment, to the extent I understand it first appeared on Amazon BEFORE the "shooting" had actually happened!

Expand full comment
Johan's avatar

And then there is this: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FQPRGTJ5/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=AYBJGGKE9PWC&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.L_GiSuA9yhgAyNqThGcwKJX0jyv7qv3kTVHYNn4oHbgtQF4Z3mber5Or1iz1yzH2.32URnsR-8A2_PoKibvmwQmskGPBU5vynmpmCX6FnakE&dib_tag=se&keywords=charlie+kirk+shooting&qid=1757622273&sprefix=charlie+kirk+shooting%2Caps%2C158&sr=8-1

I kid you not. A book available on Amazon.com by Kevin George

CHARLIE KIRK: THE SHOOTING OF CHARLIE KIRK AND THE BATTLE FOR AMERICA’S FUTURE

Book overview

On September 10, 2025, the unthinkable happened. During a scheduled speaking event at Utah Valley University, conservative activist Charlie Kirk was shot in front of a stunned audience. The incident sent shockwaves through the nation — not only as a near-tragic attack on one of America’s most polarizing figures, but as a grim warning about the state of democracy itself.

In this powerful account, Charlie Kirk: The Shooting of Charlie Kirk and the Battle for America’s Future, author Kevin George delivers a gripping, deeply researched narrative that takes readers from the chaos of the shooting to the wider crisis it represents. Through eyewitness testimony, media analysis, and political context, this book explores:

The events leading up to the Utah Valley University attack.

How the shooting unfolded in real time — and the immediate response from students, faculty, and law enforcement.

The national political firestorm, as leaders across the spectrum weighed in.

The growing threat of political violence and what it reveals about America’s deepening divides.

What this moment means for the future of free speech, campus culture, and the health of American democracy.

Part investigative chronicle, part cultural analysis, this book is not just about one man or one tragedy. It is about a nation at a crossroads, where the line between words and violence is wearing thin.

Timely, urgent, and unflinching, Charlie Kirk: The Shooting of Charlie Kirk and the Battle for America’s Future is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand how a single gunshot in Utah became a symbol of America’s struggle to hold itself together.

Expand full comment
Kika's avatar

I found this link - book published on 9th, alleged shooting on 10th September. Very strange!

https://web.archive.org/web/20250911163616/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FQMF466K

Expand full comment
Kika's avatar
Sep 12Edited

Daily Mail gives Amazon's response .... "Speaking with the Daily Mail, an Amazon spokesperson confirmed that the book was listed on September 10, noting that the publishing date was wrong due to a system error.

'The title in question is no longer available for sale. Due to a technical issue, the date of publication that had been displayed for this title, while it was briefly listed, was incorrect, and we apologize for any confusion this may have caused,' the spokesperson said.

They added that the 81-page book was actually published 'late in the afternoon' on September 10, the day Kirk was killed in Orem, Utah.

While the book was briefly available on Amazon, it was advertised as being written by Anastasia J Casey. However, the Daily Mail could not find any record of a published author by that name."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15093069/Amazon-sells-book-Charlie-Kirks-assassination.html

Expand full comment
TeeCee's avatar

I now believe it's part of the whole psyop and that it probably doesn't exist

Expand full comment
TeeCee's avatar

Omg...so they've got the book already waiting to be released?? 👀

Expand full comment
Reneé Davis's avatar

It’s now saying page not found!

Expand full comment
martin's avatar

Thank you for an excellent post yet again.

I posted a link to your article as a comment on a number of social media posts merely as an alternative point of view. I hope you do not get too much of an angry response but the psyops are now coming thick and fast.

I think we are leading up to a very big psyop so vigilance is really important.

Expand full comment
Miri AF's avatar

Thank you Martin, and thank you for sharing my link. Don't worry about the "hate fans" - and actually I haven't had too much angry feedback about this article, I feel the tide is really turning where it comes to people recognising the sheer extent of the deception in our manufactured media "reality".

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

Miri this is Eric from Planet Waves FM.

I don’t know if you have an hour read this — please, print it — though it documents the CIA’s infiltration of the National Student Association in the 50s and 60s. This is important history. When I was a student editor in the 80s through 90s, we knew about this but no internet to retrieve it. Many organizations were infiltrated in a COINTELPRO project but by the see eye ay and not the eff bee eye. the author's statement at the end is heart rending.

http://planetwaves.net/pdf/ramparts.pdf

Expand full comment
Miri AF's avatar

Thank you, Eric, I will certainly read it.

Expand full comment
Mary Cox's avatar

Eric do you use sidereal or tropical system?

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

I use the tropical system -- very few Western astrologers use Sidereal. But I can use sidereal when necessary.

Expand full comment
Mary Cox's avatar

How do you feel about the fact that the tropical system does not use the ACTUAL sky as it is but a "corrected version"? Now that I have learned about this I cant go back to tropical. It seems corrupted to me now.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

Are you implying that there is an "actual" bull in Taurus or actual fishes in Pisces that we are out of alignment with? It's all metaphor.

https://planetwaves.substack.com/p/the-your-sign-is-wrong-hoax-is-back

Expand full comment
Mary Cox's avatar

I just clicked on the link to your article. You are certainly committed to the tropical system it seems. It's just not for me., especially because I know the earth is flat and stationary so any theories that include the wobble of the earth are out for me.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

Um...I'm a professinoal and that's what I usually use. I use sidereal when I need it and I know my chart pretty good. I also can use heliocentric when I need it. I have a theory of how they relate. However, I am a Sun sign writer and that is a public form of astrology based on the tropical horoscope; and I understand the role of the tropical horoscope historically (see Rob Hand interview in the link above). The seasons are significant to human and planetary life.

Expand full comment
Susie AH's avatar

I very much looked forward to your deconstruction of this event and you didn’t disappoint! And now Poland has jumped into the fray. How much drama can society take I wonder?

Expand full comment
Miri AF's avatar

Thank you Susie. And indeed. I fear we may be in for a bit more at "Tommy's" demo on Saturday...

Expand full comment
Susie AH's avatar

I don’t think I can bear to watch it all unfold. It’s all so very manipulative and critical thinking us in very short supply these days or probably it always was.

Expand full comment
Stephen M's avatar

Many thanks for another thought-provoking article

I wonder if it is a coincidence that "kirk" is an Old English word for church...

Expand full comment
Galactic's avatar

Not surprisingly the influentials are all right on script.

Honestly I’d never heard of Charlie Kirk.

I did however sing half the day…

“What would we do baby without us…”

Excellent thank you Miri!

Expand full comment
Miri AF's avatar

Thank you, Galactic! To be honest, I'd barely heard of him either, which as another commentator noted, makes the wall-to-wall coverage here in the UK even more suspicious.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

Hi everyone. I do news astrology. I was an investigative reporter covering scientific fraud for many years (from the print era, which means editors, fact checkers and legal review) before entering astrology, and now much of what I do is forensic astrology that utilizes classical investigative technique. My main story these days is the digital haze -- the haze induced by the digital environment (and its history back to telegraph).

This is my astrological take on Charlie Kirk.

https://planetwaves.substack.com/p/charlie-kirk-chart-is-anyone-reading

Expand full comment
Petra Liverani's avatar

There is already discussion about the book that showed a pre-event publication date of 9/9 published on Amazon and since removed (but whose publication date has been explained to us as being due to a "technical issue" and the speed of publication due to its being written by AI) but I will add from a comment on my post by Currer:

Anastasia means resurrection in Greek. (Anastasia J. Casey is the alleged author.)

https://web.archive.org/web/20250911163616/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FQMF466K

Fact check - https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-shooting-charlie-kirk-215525579.html

They've really dumbed us down very big time when they push out that kind of "fact check." I mean we have to be really, really dumb to accept that.

Expand full comment
Marta Gillette's avatar

Thank you Miri, for a great breakdown, and for pulling together a timeline that pieces together the miraculous career of Charlie Kirk. His grand finale reminds me of the last scene of the Truman Show, when he walks up the stairs, bows with an ironic half smile, and then goes through the door to exit the stage and leave the Truman world behind.

The YT video you linked has been scrubbed, but I found this one which is interesting.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/DVOYmCfgn8pI

Expand full comment
John William Corcoran's avatar

I see Douglas McGregor has concerns over this shooting and referenced the President Trump Butler attempt at assassination as similarly not entirely credible, or giving cause for knowing exactly what happened. Was Mr Kirk a victim?

Expand full comment
Johan's avatar

I have been trying to figure out if we « know » Douglas McGregor’s name sufficiently. Is he for real or in the game?

Expand full comment
John William Corcoran's avatar

He features on various good commentators interviews. I think he is a retired US military general, of high rank anyway. It was a rumble video with a man with a surname Gardner. I personally have found him intelligent, discreet and knowledgeable.

Expand full comment
Kika's avatar
Sep 13Edited

Kirk was having second thoughts about the Zionists. Here’s a copy of what I think is a good comment:

“In the past two years, Kirk dedicated his large platform to unapologetically whitewashing and promoting Palestinian genocide. He also was central to the Zionist media operation to stoke the flames of anti-Muslim sentiment in the West in order to divert attention from Jewish political influence.

Ironically, it is quite possible he is the victim of those very same patrons, who are the most likely to benefit from his violent death. Zionists are already building Kirk into a martyr in order to push political censorship of anti-Israel speech and activism.”

https://www.patreon.com/posts/charlie-kirk-i-138614122

Expand full comment
John William Corcoran's avatar

The Daily mail appears to have videos of the blonde Ukraine lady bleeding on the floor of the train.

I found Gerry's article unconvincing despite the scholarship utilised. But then, that is what most Christians would say who believe the Bible account.

Expand full comment