It is interesting that someone compared Candace Owens to Rosa Parks. On a recent visit to a Masonic temple in Alexandria, VA, near Washington, DC, https://gwmemorial.org, I learned that Rosa Parks was a member of the women's Masonic group, Order of the Eastern Star. I asked the tour guide whether she became a member of the order before or after she refused to surrender her seat in the front of the bus to accommodate a white rider. He said: "Before."
My speculation is that C. Kirk was in on and groomed for this scripted and faked event. His recent criticism was part of the script. By having the sanctioned conspiracy theory be that: if you go against, criticize Israel you will be killed by Israel.
Yes, definitely. I believe Kirk (and Candace) were born into the club and trained up for their roles from a young age, and that they are, as you say, both fully complicit.
The public persona has to have a degree of 'performative' in order to look 'ordinary' on camera. While social media has done much to allow whole a raft of the public to experiment, delivering a 'show' longer than a few minutes requires rare energy.
The public can not be lulled into thinking Ms Owens or any other famous person shares anything with mere mortals. For example, 'performatives' have a standard 'greet' routine, to avoid really engaging - it's a rather practical solution to meeting lots of people in a very short time.
So, when such a 'performative' appears to go out on a limb, this is more often than not for another purpose. A purpose the public are not aware of, and unlikely to find out about very easily.
'Performatives' are entertainers, who might from time to time say or do something that might make sense. And not much more than that.
Our family, our friends and more are real. Full-on real.
Thanks Andrew, and exactly so. I get accused of saying "everyone" is fake - no, not everyone, just high-profile people performing on screens! As you say, there are plenty of very real people all around us.
Agreed with you about Candace Owens, Miri. There are many signs that Candace is inverted, so when 'she' started making such a huge fuss of calling out Brigitte Macron for being a man, I was very suspicious of where it was leading.
Thanks Steph, and yes, I think it's very probable that a lot of the high-profile people critical of the trans position are in fact trans themselves, it's just the kind of mockery the "elite" love to inflict on us. I have even wondered about Jordan Peterson - !
I agree here. As a mother of 2 daughters soon to be young women this mockery really gets to me. So many inverted "female" celebs trading on their fertility, pregnancy, breast cancer issues to scare young women out of having babies and into having masectomies etc See the latest with Florence (of the machine) telling us that "her" ectopic pregnancy nearly killed her. Grrrrr. My daughter laps up these fake from blokes in dresses and this affects my chances of being a grandma! I can barely contain my fury when it comes to this vile agenda.
Who is? Candace? Very likely not a woman. I find it curious that EGI is so unpopular amongst even the most ardent truthers. I think it because it cuts though the vapid gossip "they" have constructed for us. The whole affair is revealed for the mockery it is when someone states and believes "Candace is a bloke". No more discussion needed really. All a script for our mocking, not a real debate about Candace''s motives. Takes away some of the "fun" of being a truther sleuth which is why I think it is such an unpopular topic. Even the awake like to waste their time debating about the fake characters they create for us.
She’s a woman. We have the ability to differentiate if we just tapped into our senses. You have no proof Candace Owens is a man so you’re just speculating with nothing to go on. Some of us still require evidence to support a claim.
You have no proof that CO is a woman except that it presents as one (badly in my opinion). As "awake" people we know not to accept things at face value.
I was working a few weeks ago for a lovely couple local to me (I’m a builder) and during the time I was there the wife and I were having increasingly interesting conversations. It started when she told me she had stopped listening to the news as it was too depressing & I gave her some insights in to why that was a wonderful idea! She was a total normie but was showing signs of awakening which I obviously tried to encourage in our chats.
Anyway about 6 weeks later, out of nowhere she asked me if I thought Brigette Macron was a man?! My first question back to her was something along the lines of “where on earth did you hear this from?” to which she replied that she had been listening to CO and really liked her…
She has probably spoken to family & friends about this (as awakening people tend to do!) & they most likely thought she was insane & now if your prediction plays out, as I’m sure it will they will be “proven” right.
Thanks Deenzy, that's very interesting and would indeed fit into my theory. Someone as high-profile as Owens is there - as all prominent CO is - to divert the newly awakened into fabricated rabbit holes and ultimately make conspiracy theorists look crazy. That's why there are always so many false narratives circulated by the prominent CO. It's about relentlessly undermining the alternative position, and reaffirming that only the mainstream can be trusted.
Thank you Miri! I had actually heard of C.O. but I can’t remember ever hearing him speak about anything. Maybe very briefly. The truth is continually the inversion of what is presented.
Hats off for doing the due dilligence Miri for which most of us haven't the time nor patience. Maybe C.O is too slick and white teeth to be genuine, but I thought DNA was a decider. If not then why is the claimed Maddie McCann pursuing this line?
Thanks Kevin. Whether DNA is reliable is a whole other rabbit hole (see https://substack.com/@controlstudies), but yes, what I meant is that it's not difficult for the ruling classes to fake a DNA test. So even if Brigitte is a man, they could easily produce a fake test saying she wasn't.
DNA will be a side show, a pelvic X-ray would be the proof either way. For my part, having read the English translation of the original French exposé, the evidence appears overwhelming but who knows and why should I care. It is just yet more distraction, we awake need to concentrate on real issues. The price of gold is soaring which means something bad is coming our way.
Just to add, Candace Owens transvestigation on Brigitte Macron was nonsense. It was very easy to pull it to pieces and show where she was misdirecting her audience. She provided zero evidence to prove Brigitte Macron is a man and yet millions of people fell for the scam. This is hugely problematic and shows conspiracy theorists really can't be trusted to get it right, sadly. Why didn't the so-called awakened ones notice the lies and manipulation? Brainwashing works on the left and on the right. We only have a few people remaining with clear vision who can point these things out, usually to deaf ears and the wilfully blind. It's obvious Candace Owens is controlled op. We should collectively have the capabilities to destroy her misdirection but we seem unable or unwilling, caught up in her spell weaving. Candace Owens shows us how easily manipulated people are by jibber jabber and how they're not engaging their critical faculties by testing her thesis to see if it's true. I was open to Brigitte Macron being a man but couldn't find any proper evidence. Why did so many people think the presentation put out by Candace Owens was legitimate? Doesn't give you much hope in humanity's chances at survival if we can't work out the basics.
I wonder if the budget for controlled op includes paying people to subscribe and comment on Miri's posts..... "They" must inflitrate the truth at all levels I guess.
A better-than convincing case for CO being CO. Thanks, Miri.
CO to watch out for - YouTuber, Naira aka Signal before Silence, big faker of ChatGPT. A couple of days ago her subscribership was in the 11,000s - now it's in the 13,000s. Will be interesting to follow the subscribership trajectory. In the comments it is pointed out that (another CO agent), Ian Carroll, has mentioned her "in a good way."
I was alerted to Naira by disbeliever of the moon landings, Substacker, Don't Drink the Kool-Aid, who was persuaded by her video that showed a progression of alleged screenshots from ChatGPT culminating in a screenshot showing figures that arrive at the probability of the moon landings happening being 0.4%. Analysis of these screenshots, however, proved that they were faked and - as expected - ChatGPT states it would never have made such a claim.
If astronauts really didn't land on the moon why would they need to fake ChatGPT screenshots to tell us that when we consider that ChatGPT has agreed that the hypothesis that fits the events of 9/11 best is that it was essentially a massive anti-terror exercise cum demolition job where the death and injury were faked.
I recently took a brief look at Naira's channel and saw a video entitled, "Who Didn't Kill Charlie Kirk? The Wound, The Weapon & Why The Official Lie | E21?" I'm like, "Oh right, that'll probably be CO BS implicating Israel."
I took another look this morning and saw there's a video entitled, "Charlie Kirk Hit Job: Autopsy, Lies & Bones of Steel Stopping Bullets | E23," and wondered if perhaps its purpose was to defend the hypothesis that the killing was real ... against the argument from a significant minority that it was fake.
Sure enough - she's faking ChatGPT again ... and gets it to arrive at the following:
"A More Plausible Scenario (Constructed from Evidence)
What we're likely dealing with:
--- A targeted, professional kill using unconventional weapons and/or suppression technology
--- Scene manipulation immediately post-incident to eliminate trajectory, audio, and physical evidence
--- Possibly a remotely operated system (e.g. drone, solenoid-triggered weapon, or buried actuator in ground structure)
--- Post-operation media and forensic narrative control:
**** Delay in bullet mention
**** Pseudoscientific excuse ("man of steel" bones)
**** Absence of open autopsy
**** Fast remodeling of scene
The "rage shooter" is a cover narrative, designed to simplify public perception and terminate further enquiry."
…our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to wipe out any goyim who oppose us by deed or word…
I have seen that indisputable proof has been offered that Brigitte Macron is a woman - in the form of a photo of her car’s scraped wheel-caps.
🤣
Ah. 'Any wheel you like, regardless of colour or finish, will end up machined with random shiny spots / grooves / marks'.
It is interesting that someone compared Candace Owens to Rosa Parks. On a recent visit to a Masonic temple in Alexandria, VA, near Washington, DC, https://gwmemorial.org, I learned that Rosa Parks was a member of the women's Masonic group, Order of the Eastern Star. I asked the tour guide whether she became a member of the order before or after she refused to surrender her seat in the front of the bus to accommodate a white rider. He said: "Before."
https://www.discoverwalks.com/blog/united-states/10-trailblazing-black-eastern-stars-who-illuminated-the-masonic-path/
Oh, that's extremely interesting, thanks Sonja!
My speculation is that C. Kirk was in on and groomed for this scripted and faked event. His recent criticism was part of the script. By having the sanctioned conspiracy theory be that: if you go against, criticize Israel you will be killed by Israel.
Yes, definitely. I believe Kirk (and Candace) were born into the club and trained up for their roles from a young age, and that they are, as you say, both fully complicit.
The public persona has to have a degree of 'performative' in order to look 'ordinary' on camera. While social media has done much to allow whole a raft of the public to experiment, delivering a 'show' longer than a few minutes requires rare energy.
The public can not be lulled into thinking Ms Owens or any other famous person shares anything with mere mortals. For example, 'performatives' have a standard 'greet' routine, to avoid really engaging - it's a rather practical solution to meeting lots of people in a very short time.
So, when such a 'performative' appears to go out on a limb, this is more often than not for another purpose. A purpose the public are not aware of, and unlikely to find out about very easily.
'Performatives' are entertainers, who might from time to time say or do something that might make sense. And not much more than that.
Our family, our friends and more are real. Full-on real.
Thanks Andrew, and exactly so. I get accused of saying "everyone" is fake - no, not everyone, just high-profile people performing on screens! As you say, there are plenty of very real people all around us.
Thank you. I wrote this late yesterday, and edited it this morning - some of the phrasing was not correct, but kind people still up-voted it.
candace owens =CO=controlled opposition
Agreed with you about Candace Owens, Miri. There are many signs that Candace is inverted, so when 'she' started making such a huge fuss of calling out Brigitte Macron for being a man, I was very suspicious of where it was leading.
Thanks Steph, and yes, I think it's very probable that a lot of the high-profile people critical of the trans position are in fact trans themselves, it's just the kind of mockery the "elite" love to inflict on us. I have even wondered about Jordan Peterson - !
I agree here. As a mother of 2 daughters soon to be young women this mockery really gets to me. So many inverted "female" celebs trading on their fertility, pregnancy, breast cancer issues to scare young women out of having babies and into having masectomies etc See the latest with Florence (of the machine) telling us that "her" ectopic pregnancy nearly killed her. Grrrrr. My daughter laps up these fake from blokes in dresses and this affects my chances of being a grandma! I can barely contain my fury when it comes to this vile agenda.
She's a woman. We can tell the difference.
Who is? Candace? Very likely not a woman. I find it curious that EGI is so unpopular amongst even the most ardent truthers. I think it because it cuts though the vapid gossip "they" have constructed for us. The whole affair is revealed for the mockery it is when someone states and believes "Candace is a bloke". No more discussion needed really. All a script for our mocking, not a real debate about Candace''s motives. Takes away some of the "fun" of being a truther sleuth which is why I think it is such an unpopular topic. Even the awake like to waste their time debating about the fake characters they create for us.
She’s a woman. We have the ability to differentiate if we just tapped into our senses. You have no proof Candace Owens is a man so you’re just speculating with nothing to go on. Some of us still require evidence to support a claim.
You have no proof that CO is a woman except that it presents as one (badly in my opinion). As "awake" people we know not to accept things at face value.
There is evidence. Here is some to get you started - pay attention to the very wide set eyes, jaw shape, neck, and especially the clavicles.
https://odysee.com/@Miss_Lady:3/InShot_20230630_224357751:e
https://odysee.com/@towerruth8:0/Candace-Owens---Transvestigation:c
That’s not evidence.
Other than the mysterious "We can Tell", have you proof? The proof that you demand from others.
I was working a few weeks ago for a lovely couple local to me (I’m a builder) and during the time I was there the wife and I were having increasingly interesting conversations. It started when she told me she had stopped listening to the news as it was too depressing & I gave her some insights in to why that was a wonderful idea! She was a total normie but was showing signs of awakening which I obviously tried to encourage in our chats.
Anyway about 6 weeks later, out of nowhere she asked me if I thought Brigette Macron was a man?! My first question back to her was something along the lines of “where on earth did you hear this from?” to which she replied that she had been listening to CO and really liked her…
She has probably spoken to family & friends about this (as awakening people tend to do!) & they most likely thought she was insane & now if your prediction plays out, as I’m sure it will they will be “proven” right.
Thanks Deenzy, that's very interesting and would indeed fit into my theory. Someone as high-profile as Owens is there - as all prominent CO is - to divert the newly awakened into fabricated rabbit holes and ultimately make conspiracy theorists look crazy. That's why there are always so many false narratives circulated by the prominent CO. It's about relentlessly undermining the alternative position, and reaffirming that only the mainstream can be trusted.
and right on time she's just been horribly skewered by Bibi over the letter she demanded he print
https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-kirks-letter-to-netanyahu-revealed-read-in-full-10804835
Thank you Miri! I had actually heard of C.O. but I can’t remember ever hearing him speak about anything. Maybe very briefly. The truth is continually the inversion of what is presented.
Hats off for doing the due dilligence Miri for which most of us haven't the time nor patience. Maybe C.O is too slick and white teeth to be genuine, but I thought DNA was a decider. If not then why is the claimed Maddie McCann pursuing this line?
Thanks Kevin. Whether DNA is reliable is a whole other rabbit hole (see https://substack.com/@controlstudies), but yes, what I meant is that it's not difficult for the ruling classes to fake a DNA test. So even if Brigitte is a man, they could easily produce a fake test saying she wasn't.
DNA will be a side show, a pelvic X-ray would be the proof either way. For my part, having read the English translation of the original French exposé, the evidence appears overwhelming but who knows and why should I care. It is just yet more distraction, we awake need to concentrate on real issues. The price of gold is soaring which means something bad is coming our way.
DNA testing itself is probably accurate but we would have to trust that the result they give us is real. I’m all out of trusting proven liars
A pelvic X-ray would also work but has the same issue.
I did find the TedX talk you mentioned... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BP_MN-q46f4
Just to add, Candace Owens transvestigation on Brigitte Macron was nonsense. It was very easy to pull it to pieces and show where she was misdirecting her audience. She provided zero evidence to prove Brigitte Macron is a man and yet millions of people fell for the scam. This is hugely problematic and shows conspiracy theorists really can't be trusted to get it right, sadly. Why didn't the so-called awakened ones notice the lies and manipulation? Brainwashing works on the left and on the right. We only have a few people remaining with clear vision who can point these things out, usually to deaf ears and the wilfully blind. It's obvious Candace Owens is controlled op. We should collectively have the capabilities to destroy her misdirection but we seem unable or unwilling, caught up in her spell weaving. Candace Owens shows us how easily manipulated people are by jibber jabber and how they're not engaging their critical faculties by testing her thesis to see if it's true. I was open to Brigitte Macron being a man but couldn't find any proper evidence. Why did so many people think the presentation put out by Candace Owens was legitimate? Doesn't give you much hope in humanity's chances at survival if we can't work out the basics.
I wonder if the budget for controlled op includes paying people to subscribe and comment on Miri's posts..... "They" must inflitrate the truth at all levels I guess.
A better-than convincing case for CO being CO. Thanks, Miri.
CO to watch out for - YouTuber, Naira aka Signal before Silence, big faker of ChatGPT. A couple of days ago her subscribership was in the 11,000s - now it's in the 13,000s. Will be interesting to follow the subscribership trajectory. In the comments it is pointed out that (another CO agent), Ian Carroll, has mentioned her "in a good way."
I was alerted to Naira by disbeliever of the moon landings, Substacker, Don't Drink the Kool-Aid, who was persuaded by her video that showed a progression of alleged screenshots from ChatGPT culminating in a screenshot showing figures that arrive at the probability of the moon landings happening being 0.4%. Analysis of these screenshots, however, proved that they were faked and - as expected - ChatGPT states it would never have made such a claim.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/chatgpt-fakery-now-featuring-in-the
Question for disbelievers of the moon landings!
If astronauts really didn't land on the moon why would they need to fake ChatGPT screenshots to tell us that when we consider that ChatGPT has agreed that the hypothesis that fits the events of 9/11 best is that it was essentially a massive anti-terror exercise cum demolition job where the death and injury were faked.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/is-chatgpt-a-conspiracy-theorist
I recently took a brief look at Naira's channel and saw a video entitled, "Who Didn't Kill Charlie Kirk? The Wound, The Weapon & Why The Official Lie | E21?" I'm like, "Oh right, that'll probably be CO BS implicating Israel."
I took another look this morning and saw there's a video entitled, "Charlie Kirk Hit Job: Autopsy, Lies & Bones of Steel Stopping Bullets | E23," and wondered if perhaps its purpose was to defend the hypothesis that the killing was real ... against the argument from a significant minority that it was fake.
Sure enough - she's faking ChatGPT again ... and gets it to arrive at the following:
"A More Plausible Scenario (Constructed from Evidence)
What we're likely dealing with:
--- A targeted, professional kill using unconventional weapons and/or suppression technology
--- Scene manipulation immediately post-incident to eliminate trajectory, audio, and physical evidence
--- Possibly a remotely operated system (e.g. drone, solenoid-triggered weapon, or buried actuator in ground structure)
--- Post-operation media and forensic narrative control:
**** Delay in bullet mention
**** Pseudoscientific excuse ("man of steel" bones)
**** Absence of open autopsy
**** Fast remodeling of scene
The "rage shooter" is a cover narrative, designed to simplify public perception and terminate further enquiry."
See: https://youtu.be/rQp93leIlfY?si=feUO_6xGlUByJWCL&t=2220
If you think - remotely - that ChatGPT would ever produce the above ... and ChatGPT says, "No! Wouldn't have said that." https://chatgpt.com/share/68dd2453-afc0-800a-8b72-e1c7c32862d2
Candace is obviously a controlled op and Israel is the assassination nation. They murder with impunity when and whomever they want
They attempted to assassinate Truman , took out JFK, MLK and RFK
The put a hit on Bush I that was later abandoned
Then I could name a half dozen others that they are the likely culprits
Jews have been known assassins going back to antiquity
They are our ruling class
…our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to wipe out any goyim who oppose us by deed or word…
—Protocol No. 5
yes people like her are the dangerous ones