AUDIO: Richard D's Hall of Mirrors?
The theories of Richard D. Hall have been getting a lot of traction lately, both in the mainstream and alternative media. Why? Whilst I definitely don’t think Hall is a “crazy fantasist” and many of his theories hold weight, as ever, all is not as it seems.…
The audio version of this article is below, and for the written version, please see here.
Thanks for listening! This article was originally published at miriaf.co.uk, which is entirely reader-supported, with no paywalls, adverts, or wealthy corporate backers, meaning your support is what powers this site to keep going. If you enjoyed this article, and would like to read more in the future, please consider…
1. Subscribing monthly at Substack or via Patreon (where paid subscribers can comment on posts)
2. Making a one-off contribution via BuyMeACoffee
3. Contributing in either way via bank transfer to Nat West, account number 30835984, sort code 54-10-27, account name FINCH MA
Your support is what allows these articles to keep being created and is enormously appreciated. Thank you.
Very interesting take on this, which I came to after reading the Eric idle piece :) Unlike you, I was aware of Aisling’s work and had a lot of time for her. I appreciate and concur with your analysis that the powers that shouldn’t be are expert in creating and manipulating these dramas to further their agenda, however on this occasion I feel that Aisling’s ongoing feud with Gemma O’Docherty (and G O’D’s endorsement of Hall) has clouded her judgement. To watch her debate with Iain Davies was a real facepalm moment. Where he was putting forward observable evidence to back his claim that there was no bomb, Aisling resorted to emotionally manipulative msm footage of the victims and quoted the work of Marianna Spring! What she failed to grasp is that a) whether or not there was a bomb, and b) what killed and injured the victims, are two entirely different questions, neither proving nor disproving the other, and both deserving of investigation