In which I explore how slapstick Monty Pythonesque nineties comedies (and Mr. Idle’s legs) help us to identify contemporary controlled opposition (no, really…!).
The audio version of this article is below, and for the written version, please see here.
Thanks for listening! This article was originally published at miriaf.co.uk, which is entirely reader-supported, with no paywalls, adverts, or wealthy corporate backers, meaning your support is what powers this site to keep going. If you enjoyed this article, and would like to read more in the future, please consider…
1. Subscribing monthly at Substack (where paid subscribers can comment on posts)
2. Making a one-off contribution via BuyMeACoffee
3. Contributing in either way via bank transfer to Nat West, account number 30835984, sort code 54-10-27, account name FINCH MA
Your support is what allows these articles to keep being created and is enormously appreciated. Thank you.
Excellent piece with the kind of lucid insights that seem blindingly obvious after they have been expressed. Richard D Hall’s calm analytical approach though, has never incited lawbreaking as far as I know. Perhaps they have allowed him to continue, thinking him useful in fomenting discontent but then decided his influence was too strong and he needed to be destroyed and made an example of to discourage others? That he might knowingly be CO I find difficult to believe